C
Stop going off topic. If person E did not have or come into contact with covid thenPerson E several days ago fell off a swing. Cracked his head open
and his mom and dad are not allowed to come into the hospital to even see him.
Pray for “Person E” because “Person E” gets forgotten in many of the risk-benefit scenarios with NO risk admitted.
We have many neighbors and now have immediate family members who have had COVID.Over 70% die or experience debilitating long term issues.
People all speak this way in denial until they experience the reality of this pandemic.
You will burst out of that cocoon eventually, take off those rose colored glasses eventually.
Over 70% die or experience debilitating long term issues.
Indeed.Covid loves denial and distorted twisted myths.
Hyperbole, perhaps?Person C is infectious, is a denier, does his usual out and abouting. Spreads Covid around. Especially all over the turkey section of the store.
Person D, pregnant with her first, picks up turkey and Covid. Ends up in ICU. Loses her baby. Her husband gets Covid and is off work for months. They end up on the street with massive hospital bills they cannot pay.
“Write your own adventure”?Stop going off topic. If person E did not have or come into contact with covid then
your
write your own adventure is one of denial and downplaying this.
You are right. It certainly isn’t COVID.I’m still looking for that disease with 70% fatality or complications rate.
Certainly isn’t covid.
Bold mine.…On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%.4 In another article in the Journal , Guan et al.5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.2…
What is the point of continuing to bring up very outdated advice? It is counter to our nation’s interests.…(obsolete video of Dr. Fauci on masks).
Because the case fatality rate is essentially the same now using these parameters.What is the point of continuing to bring up very outdated advice?
That does not make this very outdated advice suddenly relevant. The virus is much more wide spread now.LeafByNiggle:
Because the case fatality rate is essentially the same now using these parameters.What is the point of continuing to bring up very outdated advice?
Do you understand the breadth of a disease does not change its case fatality rate?The virus is much more wide spread now.
It is sad, but there are many sad stories in this pandemic. Be glad that Person E has doctors and nurses available to tend to him/her.Person E several days ago fell off a swing. Cracked his head open
and his mom and dad are not allowed to come into the hospital to even see him.
(A priest-friend just told me about “Person E” today and asked my prayers for “Person E”, a relative of his.)
Pray for “Person E” because “Person E” gets forgotten in many of the risk-benefit scenarios with NO risk admitted.
Selective data is not as relevant as comprehensive data, which shows we are in a crisis of deaths. Please, people, support your public health officials and local and state governments on combatting this virus, and don’t make the job of our health care system even worse.We have many neighbors and now have immediate family members who have had COVID.
We must all be exceedingly fortunate. No 70% death there (or “debilitating long term issues” either).
Everyone did great!
Do you understand that the case fatality rate does not change the relevance of wearing masks and social distancing?LeafByNiggle:
Do you understand the breadth of a disease does not change its case fatality rate?The virus is much more wide spread now.
I am also glad he has food. Which because of the panic, a lot of people the world over DON’T have (enough of).Be glad that Person E has doctors and nurses available to tend to him/her.
So the untruthfulness in the statement is irrelevant in the face of some perceived"crisis of deaths"?Selective data is not as relevant as comprehensive data, which shows we are in a crisis of deaths.
Complete equivocation of what I said.the case fatality rate does not change the relevance of wearing masks and social distancing