J
JSmitty2005
Guest
JMJ Theresa:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/435b6/435b621c698f84be49da92bda47d8e75f64005b1" alt="Grinning face with big eyes :smiley: 😃"
They’re chewin’ on that too.I’ll take my chances.
How’s your neck, by the way?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/435b6/435b621c698f84be49da92bda47d8e75f64005b1" alt="Grinning face with big eyes :smiley: 😃"
They’re chewin’ on that too.I’ll take my chances.
How’s your neck, by the way?
As far as stats, I’ve already referred you to that Time magazine as well as 2 books. Plus, isn’t it common sense that children will be worse off with less time spent with their parents?I missed your Post #5, so I’ll retract what I said regarding that.
Concerning, whether its a trend or not that women are wanting to say home (as you say), I’m still waiting on some stats. Concerning the time I grew up (and before), it was more natural for women to stay home, that was the culture of the time. In the 70’s that started to change.
She is not an extremist of any sort, although she is anti-feminist as am I. Why don’t you just read the book and find out for yourself?After a quick Google search and review, Kate O’Beirn appears to be very conservative and anti-feminist. As such, her opinions are on the far right, thus very biased.
What experience do I need?Being only 20 yrs old, you have no actual experience to fall back on (that I’m aware of), only what you read and hear.
Where are your stats? Oh! You go by “experience.” I see.As I stated before, the vast majority of children raised by 2 parents working ended up just fine…This comes from actual experience, not reading something in a book.
The 6660’s?Of course you’re not. Look at the age you grew up in, the 6660’s, as I like to call them. Just a few months ago, this was the cover story of Time or some other liberal magazine, so that shows you how true it must be considering it goes contrary to their bias.
Experience is the best teacher. When you get some under your belt, you’ll see that.What experience do I need?
Where are your stats? Oh! You go by “experience.” I see.![]()
Actually, there is plenty of reseach out there. Last one I read was by the American Psychological Association, which shows that children of working moms are no worst of than those of stay at home moms.As far as stats, I’ve already referred you to that Time magazine as well as 2 books. Plus, isn’t it common sense that children will be worse off with less time spent with their parents?
She is not an extremist of any sort, although she is anti-feminist as am I. Why don’t you just read the book and find out for yourself?
What experience do I need?
Where are your stats? Oh! You go by “experience.” I see.Anyways, got to go study for a big test tomorrow. Later folks.
BTW, you may want to read my essay on feminism…or maybe not.![]()
As a woman reared in the 70s and 80s by a working parents, I have to respectfully disagree. I have actual experience both as a child of working parents and as a mom. Working moms should be an exception not a norm. Disaster is strong word. I’m not sure what a good word is for putting yourself ahead of your children.Being only 20 yrs old, you have no actual experience to fall back on (that I’m aware of), only what you read and hear. As I stated before, the vast majority of children raised by 2 parents working ended up just fine.
I will admit having 1 parent at home with a child while they are growing up is generally a more positive thing. However, both parents working is not a receipe for disaster either. This comes from actual experience, not reading something in a book.
I should hope not, and I want to think not, but…I’ve never done such a thing.
Maybe I’m wrong, but this sounds like you are saying that no woman should work and that all women should only be mothers and housewives, except when circumstances force the need for two incomes.I do not think that women should work but should be mothers and housewives. HOWEVER, in America, some families are forced to have both parents work.
I suspect you would get some serious rebuttal from many working mothers. I don’t know about your actual situation, but maybe you had some bad experiences. Many working mothers provided great role models for their children, as a previous poster stated.I’m not sure what a good word is for putting yourself ahead of your children.
Again, we must orient ourselves to servanthood, not self fulfillment or material wealth.
Standard disclaimer: yes, some mothers must work due to poverty. sigh.
My clients would be shocked to find out that I don’t serve them.As a woman reared in the 70s and 80s by a working parents, I have to respectfully disagree. I have actual experience both as a child of working parents and as a mom. Working moms should be an exception not a norm. Disaster is strong word. I’m not sure what a good word is for putting yourself ahead of your children.
Again, we must orient ourselves to servanthood, not self fulfillment or material wealth.
Standard disclaimer: yes, some mothers must work due to poverty. sigh.
I would suggest Pope John Paul II’s encyclicals Familiaris Consortio and On the Dignity of Woman to explain a good theology of servanthood in the family.I suspect you would get some serious rebuttal from many working mothers. I don’t know about your actual situation, but maybe you had some bad experiences. Many working mothers provided great role models for their children, as a previous poster stated.
Putting yourself ahead of your children? Unfair statement to alot of good mothers. Servanthood? A little extreme.
Well, I agree with all of this. But there is nothing wrong with me or anyone else cherishing their roles outside the home, including careers. I know people can get too wrapped up in their careers, but not all career professionals do that. I greatly cherish my profession. It truly is one of my callings in life. It affords me the opportunity to lead, teach, assist, and support an entire university and an entire society by extension. Not just anyone can do what I do. Lots of people would go bonkers in my job!So, they reject any kind of “roles.” It’s really quite absurd. Men and women are different not only biologically but also mentally, emotionally, and spiritually, so there will naturally be things that the majority of men are generally better at than women and vice versa. Anyways, the bottom line is that we are fulfilled in who we are and not in what our career is. Until you recognize that, then none of you will ever see where I’m coming from (as well as the Church and most of your ancestors).
Providing a good living and upbringing for your children, and showing your children that you can be whatever you want to be and not be harnessed by stereotypes (woman’s place is in the home), as well as, still be a good mother is what many feel is good parenting as well (sorry for the run-on sentence).I would suggest Pope John Paul II’s encyclicals Familiaris Consortio and On the Dignity of Woman to explain a good theology of servanthood in the family.
My experiences were not “bad” just typical.![]()
I was deliberately misunderstanding you. I agree that your family should come first.Sigh. I have to repeat that servanthood must first be directed towards the persons that God has placed in your care.
So, of course, we serve others outside of our family. However, if you have children and a husband they must have first claim.
So, Kendy, I wasn’t saying servanthood is limited to your family. Just that they have first claim.
Are you deliberately misunderstanding me?
A great testimony!First, I am not implying that this works out this way for everyone, but I had this job working with a number of teenagers of stay at home moms and I noticed that many of these children lacked independence skills. By the way, none of these parents were strng Christians and maybe, that made a difference. But these kids were incompetent. They couldn’t do anything for themselves. Their moms were their personal assistants. In fact, I could detect no real difference between the children of working moms than those of stay at home moms…other than the children of SAHM were occasionally (not always) more demanding since they were used to their mothers responding to their every need and they obviously thought that our staff would be the same way.
I also remember going to college and meeting girls who couldn’t had never had to do their own laundry. One girl confused the washer and dryer.
And my mom stayed home until I was ten, and that’s exactly how she was. She did everything for us, and we were completely incompentent. And then she had to work so we had to figure out how to fix our own breakfasts, and iron our own clothes, and make our own beds. When we got older, we had to use public transportation to get to school. And frankly, I am really glad she went to work. I think the temptation to do everything for one’s children is pretty great, and perhaps being too busy to do that might benefit your children in some ways.
Kendy
No argument from me either.I was deliberately misunderstanding you. I agree that your family should come first.
Kendy
Thanks Kendy, I appreciate that. When I read your posts, I appreciate your honesty and intelligent arguments.I was deliberately misunderstanding you. I agree that your family should come first.
Kendy
Actually, having a big family also “forces” you to train them.First, I am not implying that this works out this way for everyone, but I had this job working with a number of teenagers of stay at home moms and I noticed that many of these children lacked independence skills. By the way, none of these parents were strng Christians and maybe, that made a difference. But these kids were incompetent. They couldn’t do anything for themselves. Their moms were their personal assistants. In fact, I could detect no real difference between the children of working moms than those of stay at home moms…other than the children of SAHM were occasionally (not always) more demanding since they were used to their mothers responding to their every need and they obviously thought that our staff would be the same way.
I also remember going to college and meeting girls who couldn’t had never had to do their own laundry. One girl confused the washer and dryer.
And my mom stayed home until I was ten, and that’s exactly how she was. She did everything for us, and we were completely incompentent. And then she had to work so we had to figure out how to fix our own breakfasts, and iron our own clothes, and make our own beds. When we got older, we had to use public transportation to get to school. And frankly, I am really glad she went to work. I think the temptation to do everything for one’s children is pretty great, and perhaps being too busy to do that might benefit your children in some ways.
Kendy