J
JimG
Guest
I find it simply astonishing how eager some schools are to destroy the innocence of children.
My thoughts exactly. My 11 year old son’s driving loves are football and playing Lego Star Wars on X-Box. The idea of girls doesn’t even make him blink. Makes me wonder what the he…ck is wrong with our country where we need to make sure 10 and 11 year olds need to know about proper condom use. I have no intention of putting my kids back into the public indoctrination system to turn them into mindless little sex-crazed tax slaves.If you can’t afford your kids to go to a Catholic school from k-12th then I would suggest finding a way to make it work for home schooling, if not with yourself than with someone in your parish if you are lucky to find someone? Keeping children away from the governments influence (as well as medias influence) is the only way to give them better chances at making it in life. My generation was hit hard but looking at the generations after, with the stuff thats forced down their throats, I pray for the future of this world.
Sex for 10 year olds is only illegal if their partner is older than them (i.e. I’ve never heard of a 12 year old charged with statutory rape (exception–California, both minors would be guilty of a misdemeanor)). Moreover, the state is not advocating for statutory rape, as this is something the 10 year olds do not initiate, as they are the victims. What education does allow is for them to understand the seriousness of the situation and what details might be important to tell people.Did you somehow miss the fact that sex is illegal for 10 year olds? In some states it is called statutory rape, or child molestation, or contributing to the delinquency of a minor. There is no such thing as “proper” use of a condom by a ten year old, and teaching that there is qualifies as a moral judgement that no public school should be making.
I believe the sound effects engineers from the Lord of the Rings covered their microphones in condoms so they could submerge/bury them and get recordings of very unique sounds.
- A condom placed over the muzzle of your rifle will prevent water from collecting in the barrel, thus preventing a potenially fatal misfire when the weapon is discharged.
- A condom packed with C-4 is useful for exploding heavy locks, gates, enemy vehicle engines, and other demolition purposes—but improperly employed, can cause serious or fatal wounds and make you a casualty.
nytimes.com/2011/09/16/us/in-texas-more-schools-teach-abstinence-plus.html?pagewanted=allTEN YEAR olds DO NOT, repeat, DO NOT, need to know how to use a condom! most of them haven’t hit puberty, definitely are NOT interested in girls/boys yet and most assuredly are NOT DATING!
Why would a TEN YEAR old need to know how to use a condom?!?!?
You answered me with a NYTimes article. That is not an answer, Tell me, not with an article, WHY TEN YEAR OLDS need to learn about condoms! *** Is it because they are expected*** to have sex at 12 years old? 13? 15? Why would they need to learn how to use a condom? what about those who actually will have SELF CONTROL?nytimes.com/2011/09/16/us/in-texas-more-schools-teach-abstinence-plus.html?pagewanted=all
Texas school districts have girls as young as 13 that are pregnant. I suppose they might wait until the students are 12, but perhaps the schools have some sort of health class that is already offered in the 5th grade.
Why does “interest in girls” have anything to do with it? Should we wait until kids have an interest in history or math before we teach it to them?You answered me with a NYTimes article. That is not an answer, Tell me, not with an article, WHY TEN YEAR OLDS need to learn about condoms! *** Is it because they are expected*** to have sex at 12 years old? 13? 15? Why would they need to learn how to use a condom? what about those who actually will have SELF CONTROL?
Don’t give me nonsense about 13 year olds that are pregnant.
Tell me why a TEN YEAR old needs to be taught “proper condom use” when most are not interested in girls! Most haven’t even hit puberty.
my ten year old nephew likes Jets football and his XBOX. Luckily he goes to a Catholic school so he won’t be given this type of test.
I think I’ll be waiting for a** clear **answer for a LONG TIME.
I’m sure you remember the story from a couple of yrs ago of the 9 yr old girl in Brazil who was old enough to get pregnant. There was quite a fury after she was raped and her mother wanted her to undergo an abortion rather than forcing her young child to carry the pregnancy to term. And the Catholic Church got involved with excommunications.Old enough to either get pregnant or get someone pregnant.
Yes. And of course, they should know what a gun is and how to use it, and they should also know what bombs are and how to use these bombs to blow up buildings and such. After all, they see this all the time on TV and this is something that parents should be dealing with since they are allowing their children to watch TV. (???!!!???)Do kids know what cigarettes are and what they are for? Yes, but that hardly motivates them to try them. If a parent has a problem with condoms or premarital sex, that is something they should instill in their children. This sort of education can hardly be considered an undermining of parental authority.
Again, this is an outlier situation. It should not dictate the norm. The majority of nine year old girls aren’t anywhere near puberty, yet.I’m sure you remember the story from a couple of yrs ago of the 9 yr old girl in Brazil who was old enough to get pregnant. There was quite a fury after she was raped and her mother wanted her to undergo an abortion rather than forcing her young child to carry the pregnancy to term. And the Catholic Church got involved with excommunications.
Condoms don’t really “protect” anybody from anything. They have a very high failure rate among teens, which means that if we tell kids, “We don’t want you to have sex, but if you do, wear a condom for protection,” the message the kids get is, “If I wear a condom, it’s okay for me to have sex,” and the next thing you know, his condom breaks, or falls off (because I’m pretty sure they don’t make child-sized condoms), he gets his 12 year old “girl friend” pregnant, and voila, another teen pregnancy statistic - and/or another STD, and/or another victim of AIDS.In any case while being 10 is not what is was in my day, simple math shows us 10 yr olds still soon become teenagers. And while abstinance is a laudable goal and aspiration for us to have for them, and for parents to instill, reality is still reality.
You are so old fashioned.Again, this is an outlier situation. It should not dictate the norm. The majority of nine year old girls aren’t anywhere near puberty, yet.
Condoms don’t really “protect” anybody from anything. They have a very high failure rate among teens, which means that if we tell kids, “We don’t want you to have sex, but if you do, wear a condom for protection,” the message the kids get is, “If I wear a condom, it’s okay for me to have sex,” and the next thing you know, his condom breaks, or falls off (because I’m pretty sure they don’t make child-sized condoms), he gets his 12 year old “girl friend” pregnant, and voila, another teen pregnancy statistic - and/or another STD, and/or another victim of AIDS.
Instead, we need to teach kids, “You will be ready to have sex when the two of you are married and ready to raise the children who will be born from your sexual union.”
Well yes statistically they might have a higher failure rate than lets say the pill. But I’m pretty sure, well ok I’m absolutely 100% certain,Condoms don’t really “protect” anybody from anything. They have a very high failure rate among teens, which means that if we tell kids, “We don’t want you to have sex, but if you do, wear a condom for protection,” the message the kids get is, “If I wear a condom, it’s okay for me to have sex,” and the next thing you know, his condom breaks, or falls off (because I’m pretty sure they don’t make child-sized condoms), he gets his 12 year old “girl friend” pregnant, and voila, another teen pregnancy statistic - and/or another STD, and/or another victim of AIDS.
Instead, we need to teach kids, “You will be ready to have sex when the two of you are married and ready to raise the children who will be born from your sexual union.”
Let me put it this way - they are far more likely to heed it if they receive it and hear it, than if they don’t, or if the message gets watered down and confused with opposing messages.Well yes statistically they might have a higher failure rate than lets say the pill. But I’m pretty sure, well ok I’m absolutely 100% certain,you don’t want those used either. I have no problem with teaching kids that. Now the question remains in the real world is every kid always going to heed their parents’ teaching?
As if there were no out of wedlock pregancies back in the olden days.You are so old fashioned.
Ahhh, so, we should just encourage our 10 year olds to screw their brains out. Maybe we should teach the kids the safe way to shoot up heroin while we’re at it.As if there were no out of wedlock pregancies back in the olden days.![]()
And make sure to clean their bongs between hits.Ahhh, so, we should just encourage our 10 year olds to screw their brains out. Maybe we should teach the kids the safe way to shoot up heroin while we’re at it.
As a product of the ‘olden days,’ I can only offer my personal experience. In my high school, we had no sex education whatever. In my high school, there were no teen pregnancies. None. Zero.As if there were no out of wedlock pregancies back in the olden days.![]()