H
HCTC
Guest
As far as government jobs that involve a profession, I think that the work itself is no less difficult, but it is more defined in scope. For example, in pubic sector high tech jobs there is the responsibility to understand and incorporate innovation but not develop innovation. Innovation is exciting, potentially lucrative and all-consuming. It leaves little time and attention for family. Yet another example would be that public sector jobs are performed in one time zone while private sector tech jobs sometimes span time zones on different sides of the globe. It gives new meaning to Walt Whitman’s Crossing Brooklyn Ferry: “Whatever it is, it avails not—distance avails not, and place avails not.”Exactly what I expect based on experience. Less skilled workers make out like kings. More skilled workers make less in return for having a much easier job. All make out like kings in retirement and benefits. And all have far less fear of ever being fired. They especially don’t have to worry about being fired because their position is being eliminated. The government only ever grows.
In the matter of State government compensation: When revenue declines, employee income declines; and/or there are layoffs. The real advantage for government employees is that there is a written layoff procedure so that employees know and understand how and why layoffs will be implemented. It is also advantageous to know that if there are layoffs, employees have rights in the event that rehiring occurs. All of these advantages are the result of employer-employee processes within government that address fairness. While fairness is not absent in the private sector, it has a higher priority in public sector entities that strive, or should strive, to reflect American values.
Last edited: