Q
qui_est_ce
Guest
This url has already been posted and debunked as a blog by Brother JR in post 450That’s the whole point: " the fact-finding people probably need to take these further facts into account, especially if they have been taking some kind of email or textual evidence as evidentiary: that’s the SCARIEST (my emphasis) notion in this whole thing" (jrpresearch.org).
Everybody do yourself a favor and review the report below:
jrpresearch.org/blog/2011/07/07/solt-independent-fact-finding-team-must-have-missed-this-stuff-please-rt/
This is just a blog. Bloggers have many opinions. This particular blog does not prove that the SOLT acted maliciously. In fact, this blogger oversteps his bounds. You and I cannot tell the SOLT leadership to back-off. This blogger did that in one of his statements. Only the bishop can do that.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF![]()
