S
SPOKENWORD
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b25f3/b25f3d19fc00336ca33a42c4022eacf52a256393" alt="40.png"
Like I said all you did was leave the building.Are you going to continue to live by that spirit of fear. Or are you going to seek God that He may set you free. Its your choice.No “curses” involved. Masonic ritual is essentially a collection of formal rules of order regarding the conduct of meetings, proper address of officers of the lodge, etcetera. The oaths are formed in the stilted language of ancient British legalities and readily misunderstood: they are an oath and a prayer addressed to God, which petition Him (and Him alone) to oversee the faithfulness of the Mason in maintaining as private the internal matters of the Lodge. The oaths are taken with the prior admonition of the Worshipful Master of the Lodge that nothing contained in the oaths or taught by by Lodge at any time will ever or can ever conflict with any duty or obligation owed by the candidate to his family, his country, or his God. If such a conflict arose–it would necessarily negate the terms under which the oath were contracted. No ‘renunciation’ would be obligatory.
By the bye: I am not a Roman Catholic. Neither am I commending to Roman Catholics that they flout their church or their consciences and join the Lodge. I have simply pointed out that virtually every secular reason, and most theological reasons tendered for not joining, are based upon false pretences. The Lodge is NOT a surrogate religious movement and one is NOT asked to believe things contrary to one’s faith, as noted above. Freemasonry is not a conspiratorial institution manipulating history from the shadows. It’s worst aspect was the long-established (and long-renounced, in the Grand Lodges of the USA) practice of ‘preferment’. This was the committment of Lodge-members to ‘prefer’ to buy goods of equal value sold by both Masonic and non-Masonic retailers from the Masoninc retailer; to vote–where other issues were not at stake–for the Masonic candidate over the non-Mason; to promote among candidates of equal talent and ability the Freemason. This practice became problematic for American Freemasons long ago and was disavowed (the British faced scandals rooted in ‘preferment’ as late as the 1980’s and early 90’s).
What WASN’T resolved very quickly in American Freemasonry was a split in the Lodges based along racial lines: Blacks had their own Lodges from colonial times, recognized by the Grand Lodge of England but not by any of the 50 Grand Lodges of the USA until the late 1990’s and early 21st century. Before that time, very few Lodges accepted Blacks at all, and most which did were extremely selective about the matter. At the time that I joined, the “Prince Hall” (Black) Lodges were in rapprochment with White Grand Lodges in my home state, and each now gives full recognition to the other.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7079e/7079e2364c7e6bc9a509f3429fba1fa1c93d7548" alt="Eek! :eek: :eek:"