Gay Marriage and the End of Christian Civilization

  • Thread starter Thread starter DawnInTexas
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But you have spoken of the one thing that is the **essence **of this debate. God’s natural law will not be mocked and the only thing we all have to do, whether hetero or gay is to be chaste.
Thank you! That is the center of the whole issue. This singular obsession we have with politics and trivial things always tends to overshadow the one thing: God’s Law shall not be mocked. I think every one of us, no matter our ‘leanings’, will acknowledge that the love of God and the wish to glorify Him come first. 🙂 Your prayers are appreciated…

Gloria in excelsis Deo,
et in terra pax hominibus bonae voluntatis

That is the essence of human life, of which homosexuality is secondary.
 
No one will force you or anyone else to have any gay sex because of the marriage law. We can check Massachusetts, if you want, to see if anyone is being forced to commit sexual sins because of the change in the law there. You can keep being holy and devout and righteous. The broadening of civil marriage to include gays effects the Church not at all.
Your obvious sarcasm does little to advance the conversation and I said nothing about being forced to have gay sex. You might show some respect, though, for the majority of posters on this forum who are Christians who live their faith. I completely disagree that gay marriage will not effect the Church, society, and the family unit profoundly. Let’s talk about Massachusetts since you mentioned it, where Christian parents are NOT even allowed to opt their children out of gay sex ed classes which is clearly a violation of our moral obligation to protect our children from what we consider an ungodly influence. Our first priority is to LIVE our lives in accordance with the statutes of the Lord, and as a free republic, to be able to reject (without undue influence) that which we consider immoral.
 
Your obvious sarcasm does little to advance the conversation and I said nothing about being forced to have gay sex. You might show some respect, though, for the majority of posters on this forum who are Christians who live their faith. I completely disagree that gay marriage will not effect the Church, society, and the family unit profoundly. Let’s talk about Massachusetts since you mentioned it, where Christian parents are NOT even allowed to opt their children out of gay sex ed classes which is clearly a violation of our moral obligation to protect our children from what we consider an ungodly influence. Our first priority is to LIVE our lives in accordance with the statutes of the Lord, and as a free republic, to be able to reject (without undue influence) that which we consider immoral.
I do not treat with sarcasm anyone who has not already treated me with scorn or self-righteousness.

I show respect to every poster here, at least initially. Then, when certain attitudes are taken, they can lose that respect, yes. I hold adults to very high standards of discussion. I teach teenageers, and expect it in my classroom, too. And I expect even more from full adults.

Yes, let’s talk Massachusetts.

Can you explain, please, how gay marriage has anything to do with the policy around teacher control of material in the classroom? If you can’t do this satisfactorily, don’t expect me to just roll over and say “Uncle” on the issue. You only have a point if you can show that the passing of gay marriage caused the teacher in question to become inflexible. And good luck with that. But I will wait to read your argument. Otherwise, you are merely associating recent (actually, the Lincoln school in question, I believe, is from events in 2004–but I will let you research that to make your case) events merely to build a cloud of ills, all of which you would like to suggest caused each other. If you don’t mean this, then please be clearer about what exactly you are claiming is a *cause *and which is an effect.

Thank you, and I engage in this discussion with all due respect, no matter what your faith is (I rarely even look at those religion labels).
 
Yes, let’s talk Massachusetts.

Can you explain, please, how gay marriage has anything to do with the policy around teacher control of material in the classroom? If you can’t do this satisfactorily, don’t expect me to just roll over and say “Uncle” on the issue. You only have a point if you can show that the passing of gay marriage caused the teacher in question to become inflexible. And good luck with that. But I will wait to read your argument. Otherwise, you are merely associating recent (actually, the Lincoln school in question, I believe, is from events in 2004–but I will let you research that to make your case) events merely to build a cloud of ills, all of which you would like to suggest caused each other. If you don’t mean this, then please be clearer about what exactly you are claiming is a *cause *and which is an effect.
It may have been 2004 and I’m still searching for the link to the Massachusetts case where the parents of a kindergartner were unable to opt their child out of a classroom where a gay textbook was being used. The parents were not asking for the school to change its curriculum, only that they be allowed to remove their child from that particular class. The courts voted in favor of the school; however I don’t know if it moved to the Supreme Court. Is anyone familiar with this who can post the link?

We can all see where this is going. Here are examples of the current movement regarding homosexuality and children. Do not be naïve in thinking that the proponents of gay marriage are not hoping to advance this cause and bring about a new acceptance and “respectability.”

SAFE SCHOOL CZAR DEFENDS GRAPHIC CLASSROOM DESCRIPTIONS OF GAY SEX ACTS TO CHILDREN:

(Organization Founded by Kevin Jennings And Funded By Federal Tax Dollars Presenting Graphic Classroom Descriptions Of Gay Sex Acts To Children As Young As 12.)
According to watchdog group Mass Resistance, GLSEN is a national homosexual organization that targets children in public schools across the country.

(It’s not just about respect and tolerance anymore!)

grandrants.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/%e2%80%9csafe-school-czar%e2%80%9d-defends-graphic-classroom-descriptions-of-gay-sex-acts-to-children/

A federal appeals court panel has upheld a Massachusetts policy of indoctrinating elementary school students with pro-homosexual attitudes without their parents consent. (2008)
orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2008/07/16/no-opt-out-of-homosexual-indoctrination-in-class-for-massachusetts-parents/

Gay groups (Mass) – “We have rights to your children.”
mingle2.com/topic/show/222006
 
Tigg;6973098We can all see where this is going. Here are examples of the current movement regarding homosexuality and children. Do not be naïve in thinking that the **proponents of gay marriage are not hoping to advance this cause and bring about a new acceptance and “respectability.” [/quote said:
That proponents of gay marriage hope to increase social acceptance of homosexuality is, I think, a given.

And now you have totally changed the nature of the topic and your claim.

Yes, proponents of gay marriage hope to gain more social acceptance in a society generally conditioned by religion to see their orientation as a damnable abomination.

Can we get back to the claim that gay marriage causes damage in society and the evidence for that? Or shall I just assume that there is no evidence of this, and we can just move on?
 
That proponents of gay marriage hope to increase social acceptance of homosexuality is, I think, a given.

And now you have totally changed the nature of the topic and your claim.

Yes, proponents of gay marriage hope to gain more social acceptance in a society generally conditioned by religion to see their orientation as a damnable abomination.

Can we get back to the claim that gay marriage causes damage in society and the evidence for that? Or shall I just assume that there is no evidence of this, and we can just move on?
First, the Bible reflects an undeniable condemnation of homosexual acts, and since the Bible is Revelation received from God, it is not society who has deemed such acts as being an admonination, rather that comes from God.

Second, if we redefine marriage to include gays, that will destroy marriage and it will ultimately mean a huge loss of freedoms from people of faith. If that is not damage, than I am not sure what the word “damage” means.
 
Totally overblown argument. Gay lifestyle has always been around, they just want some equal contract rights. Just can’t get that excited about this.
They already have equal contract rights. The fight over gay “marriage” is a lever for overturning the concept of marriage in general. The effects are not seen overnight, but over several years or even decades. It is like termites in wood. Things look just fine until the whole structure is brought down. The marriage thing is only the beginning.
 
First, the Bible reflects an undeniable condemnation of homosexual acts, and since the Bible is Revelation received from God, it is not society who has deemed such acts as being an admonination, rather that comes from God.

What about those of us who do not share your faith?

Second, if we redefine marriage to include gays, that will destroy marriage and it will ultimately mean a huge loss of freedoms from people of faith. If that is not damage, than I am not sure what the word “damage” means.

How does allowing gays to marry lead it to be necessary that the destruction of marriage and freedoms will follow? Simply saying something doesn’t make it true.
 
They already have equal contract rights.
False. Several states have even banned civil unions.
The fight over gay “marriage” is a lever for overturning the concept of marriage in general.
False, again. It is an effort to participate IN IT.
The effects are not seen overnight, but over several years or even decades. It is like termites in wood. Things look just fine until the whole structure is brought down. The marriage thing is only the beginning.
Which structure? And who are the “termites”?
 
40.png
Kevin42:
The destruction of marriage comes about when you make the meaning of marriage disappear and that is what will happen if marriage is redefined. The truth is if you redefine marriage once, than it cannot be redefined any number of times for any number of reasons and that simply leads to marriage/family/children meaning nothing–the foundation of the culture falls apart and so will (eventually) the culture itself.
 
The effects are not seen overnight, but over several years or even decades. It is like termites in wood. Things look just fine until the whole structure is brought down. The marriage thing is only the beginning.
People cannot understand this very important point you make. The left takes tiny little chips away from the foundation, hoping that they will be able to rebuild the structure (society) in a much better image (their image and likeness). They do not know that they are really slowly tearing down the building (society). By the time they learn what they did, it will be too late because it takes a lot for people to acknowledge they went the wrong way. Narsicism is a common problem today. People ask, “what is good for me,” rather than “what is good for the nation as a whole,” and they do care if they hurt the nation or not.

We went from the greatest generation to the worst generation in ONE generation. Amazing.
 
Do you consider Constitutional law and justice “trivial things”?
No, we do not, but “justice” can only be achieved and defined when it is coupled with God’s eternal and never-ending Truth. Obviously you would want the secular state to be the Arbiter of Justice! (Which, btw, makes no sense to me since in recent years it has systemically and sufficiently shredded the Constitution!) I wonder where that leaves us?
That proponents of gay marriage hope to increase social acceptance of homosexuality is, I think, a given.

And now you have totally changed the nature of the topic and your claim.

Yes, proponents of gay marriage hope to gain more social acceptance in a society generally conditioned by religion to see their orientation as a damnable abomination.

Can we get back to the claim that gay marriage causes damage in society and the evidence for that? Or shall I just assume that there is no evidence of this, and we can just move on?
I gave you links to substantiate the harm the gay movement intends upon Christianity and faith (which you cannot deny includes the right to gay marriage; it is all encapsulated) and what it is doing to indoctrinate our society via our children. The threat against the first amendment is very evident and parental rights would be abdicated (as in Massachusetts); various legal threats against Christians which would contend hate crimes and assaults upon religion in general. I could give you many links, but why bother? I’m sure you could find arguments against them written by God’s own enemies.

I know you don’t believe that and really, it all boils down to a moral issue. What is the evidence that can be given to a non-believer? None! One Catholic Archbishop described same sex marriage as an aberration. This is what I believe in my heart, but you have already accused me once of being self-righteous.

So be it! God’s truth will not be denied in the end. I’m done with this thread.

God bless all and may His truth reign in your hearts.
 
No, we do not, but “justice” can only be achieved and defined when it is coupled with God’s eternal and never-ending Truth. [/QUOTED]You mean with the Quran, right? Or some other religion? Which religion’s God are you refering to? Please be specific.
Obviously you would want the secular state to be the Arbiter of Justice!
 
Where is the evidence of the detrimental impact of legal Gay Marriage?
Massachusetts’ Catholic orphan placement (with over a century of good work) is gone; history. That was inside of two years of the state’s going forward with gay marriage and demanding that the Church’s charitable arms comply. Dissent against the state’s norm rendered the institution illegal.

Being truly Catholic will be perilous. We will be branded haters and, though we’ve become acclimated to this lie throughout history with varying levels of intensity, for the first time in America we will become subject to government isolation and, eventually, illegality.

I believe in our lifetime we may see true, prison-time enforcement of hate crime legislation against Catholics who won’t budge their views wherever they touch on their actions in the public sphere.
 
The left will push for all churches to marry same sex couples, including the RCC. If a church rejects it, than the left will sue until they do. Eventually RCC’s will have to comply by law, or close their doors.
I agree. This is right around the corner. An evangelical wedding photographer in the Southwest (Arizona?) was fined $7,500 for (politely) declining to record a same sex union. They’re not just going to issue fines; they have already started to use the whip of government force at faithful Christians. Those who stand firm will be hurt at least monetarily. In time, the punishment will accelerate.
 
The Muslim Angle.

I searched this lengthy thread using “Muslim” and “Islam” with no hits. So here’s a differing angle that offers those of us on the alarmist side (I am with you): a very ironic kind of hope.

*Muslims will also not abide s.s.m. in any way. *They may be a strange ally for us to thwart any policy threats that may come our way. The left fears them more than the Church, in my opinion, and will flounder to find any way to sway Muslim tenets in this issue.

For example, a comedian on the Comedy Channel admitted in an interview lately that he fears nothing having fun at Christian religions’ expense. But he admitted he was afraid to joke about Islam at all.

No predictions here, but it is a reality that the left will have a worse time trying to change. (In fact, I don’t see Islam or its adherents budging one iota). Should any action against the Church of real impact for our freedom have occurred, we can strike back by evoking equal protection clause(s) of the nation and the states.
 
I gave you links to substantiate the harm the gay movement intends upon Christianity and faith (which you cannot deny includes the right to gay marriage; it is all encapsulated) and what it is doing to indoctrinate our society via our children. The threat against the first amendment is very evident and parental rights would be abdicated (as in Massachusetts); various legal threats against Christians which would contend hate crimes and assaults upon religion in general. I could give you many links, but why bother? I’m sure you could find arguments against them written by God’s own enemies.
I am certain I speak for myself and most other gay people when I say that all we want is to be able to marry and live in peace without the threat of violence or discrimination. Sure there are fringe groups who may have bizarre goals, but that is true of many other groups of people. We have no desire to turn your children gay, or teach them all about gay sex, or turn them from whatever their faith may be. Finally, I myself would abhor any violation of the first amendment.
 
Any history buffs here who can tell us how long ancient Greece survived after being gay became normal there?
You mean ancient Greece, that which may regards as the cradle of civilization? Must have been several hundred years, till they were absorbed by the Roman empire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top