Is one required to be a republican to be a commenter on Fox News? It seems that they usually have a diversity of perspectives. Is a former republican who won’t vote for Trump a reasonable perspective to have? I would seem to thinks so.
Why would you think they would not want to have him as a commentator? If you are looking for information I would suggest you check out the Fox News website, they would have the most up to date information. This is a site where people exchange opinions. If you don’t want other’s opinions I have to question why you bother posting here in the first place?
His words betray his true feelings about women, the importance of treating people with respect, how he sees his role as commander in chief (as opposed to being the most successful business man ever), etc. I can’t vote for someone to be president who has no filter. The idea that you can just say whatever you want whenever you want is something that small children are encouraged to outgrow.
I didn’t have to make the choice for these candidates.
I didn’t vote for Bill Clinton, either time. Tell me, why is when people feel the need to defend Donald Trump’s childish rants, name calling, hypocritical policy positions and down right poor character…they bring up other people who were just as bad as if to say that makes it okay?
I give her a bit of credit then for having the maturity to understand that some things are better said in private and not broadcast across the country in a series of 2am tweets.
I have an alcoholic cousin who starts out every bender saying to his fellow bar patrons, “Yeah, I know I’m an alcoholic. So what?”. Admirable is recognizing your faults and trying to be a better person, not bragging about them. Donald Trump has no desire to be a better person or candidate as far as I can tell.
Spoken like a true Democrat.
Indeed. Being against HRC is easier than (fill in your own analogy).
Feel free to make a counterpoint based on facts if you would like.
But it’s questionable whether any of them could have won the general. Recall Trump’s comments about running third party if Republicans didn’t treat him the way he wanted to be treated.
Heh. So I guess “pretending to care” is based on facts?
It is never “throwing your vote away” to vote your conscience. In fact, I would argue the reverse is true. I have a friend who has been voting for the Green Party ticket no matter what for several election cycles. He simply does not believe in anything the other candidates stand for.
Not to butt in, but in this analogy is Donald Trump the Pope? Hmmm.
I’m hard-pressed to come up with a counterexample to what I said. I guess you are, too.Heh. So I guess “pretending to care” is based on facts?
Fair enough. But I don’t know the answer.
I would ask it like this: “if Trump wins and does a good job will the Republican party join him?” I hope not – I can stand the idea of a Trump presidency, but not the idea of Trump defining what Republican means.
I agree.
That would be like directing a herd of cats. There really isn’t any unity in the Republican party, and I’m not sure there ever has been. It’s a conglomeration of “parties of one”. It’s actually one of its better features that people can dissent within it. The Democrats were once like that too, but they haven’t been for a long, long time.
Pax Christi!
God bless Will Rogers. The Democrats have always been described as being unable to be corralled like cats. How things have changed.
It’s quite possible that he is so unhappy with Trump, that he may feel that Hillary can do the least damage to the country in four years and this will give the republicans time to cultivate a viable candidate to go against the democratic candidate.
I’ve been hearing a good argument for this line of reasoning.