Georgia Governor Calls For Audit After Heroes Capture Shredder Truck Loading Election Materials

  • Thread starter Thread starter gam197
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gam197

Guest
Last edited:
I feel so sorry for you. I think the head of this thread is, more exactly, that some folks “captured pictures” of a shredder truck. The results are in yet those Republicans will not accept reality, being bitter about the results. They cling to that slim hope of overturning the will of the people.

Maybe in this context they are truly ‘bitter clingers’?
 
Last edited:
You have to wonder what they are doing there. These are private citizens reporting what they are seeing at their election sites.

Another private citizen posted that there was one at another election site in PA. People take notice of trucks especially shredder trucks at polling places.

Not saying there is anything wrong but people are going to take videos and post.
 
Last edited:
The problem with “citizen journalists” is they have no standards, no ethics, no guardrails around their “reporting”.

So, what did the election officials say about this? Who was interviewed? Was the explanation checked out?

Yeah, I thought so.
 
You have to wonder what they are doing there.
No you don’t.
But if you choose too, enjoy.
The problem with “citizen journalists” is they have no standards, no ethics, no guardrails around their “reporting”.
Yeah, she is reporting on her speculations.
So, what did the election officials say about this? Who was interviewed? Was the explanation checked out?
https://www.cobbcounty.org/elections/news/document-shredding-jim-r-miller-park
There has been significant social media chatter about some document shredding at the Jim R. Miller Park Event Center in Marietta, Georgia where our Elections Department had previously conducted the state-ordered re-tally of votes in the November 3rd election.

The shredding company routinely responds to the Elections Department following an election to help dispose of non-relevant materials that cannot be easily disposed of. The company did work at the Jim R. Miller Event Center early on Friday, November 20th, and helped dispose of the following items:
  • Mailing labels (with voter info) that are incorrect or if we’ve printed too many
  • Copies of apps printed from OnBase if we are looking for something (the originals are filed in evidence)
  • Copies of outdated or changed procedures, policies, forms, notes, or form letters
  • Regular and third-party envelopes with voter info on them
  • Reports when we are finished doing ‘check off the list’ steps
  • Sticky notes and phone messages with voter phone #s or email addresses
  • White privacy envelopes after the election is certified
  • Printouts of old emails when we have a more current response in the chain
  • Duplicates of faxed applications (when voters fax multiples copies of the same app all at the same time)
  • There were a tub or two of applications we had copied for the December election and labels that we put in the shredder when the elections were combined and moved to January 5th
“None of these items are relevant to the election or the re-tally,” said Elections Director Janine Eveler. “Everything of consequence, including the ballots, absentee ballot applications with signatures, and anything else used in the count or re-tally remains on file. After an out-of-context video was shared on social media we contacted state officials to reassure them this was a routine clean-up operation and they could come to inspect our stored materials if they wished.”

Elections workers remain at the Jim R. Miller Event Center to help prepare for the January 5th runoff.
 
The problem with “citizen journalists” is they have no standards, no ethics, no guardrails around their “reporting”.

So, what did the election officials say about this? Who was interviewed? Was the explanation checked out?
No they don’t and that is why no one has an idea what the trucks were there for but private citizens at the polling/counting places are going to video each time they see a shredder truck, , to be expected.
 
that is why no one has an idea what the trucks were there for but private citizens at the polling/counting places are going to video each time they see a shredder truck, , to be expected.
The post immediately above yours explains why the shredders were present.
 
No they don’t and that is why no one has an idea what the trucks were there for but private citizens at the polling/counting places are going to video each time they see a shredder truck, , to be expected.
Sigh.

Read the post above yours from thinkingsapien and consider deleting this thread.
 
that is why no one has an idea what the trucks were there for
Demonstrably false. It only took like 5 seconds of effort.

Document destruction services are not unusual for entities that handle confidential information.
 
48.png
gam197:
No they don’t and that is why no one has an idea what the trucks were there for but private citizens at the polling/counting places are going to video each time they see a shredder truck, , to be expected.
Sigh.

Read the post above yours from thinkingsapien and consider deleting this thread.
I was in the process of posting my post when his posted.

So it seems it was a concern and that it was addressed which to good to know. So these things went.
  • Mailing labels (with voter info) that are incorrect or if we’ve printed too many
  • Copies of apps printed from OnBase if we are looking for something (the originals are filed in evidence)
  • Copies of outdated or changed procedures, policies, forms, notes, or form letters
  • Regular and third-party envelopes with voter info on them
  • Reports when we are finished doing ‘check off the list’ steps
  • Sticky notes and phone messages with voter phone #s or email addresses
  • White privacy envelopes after the election is certified
  • Printouts of old emails when we have a more current response in the chain
  • Duplicates of faxed applications (when voters fax multiples copies of the same app all at the same time)
  • There were a tub or two of applications we had copied for the December election and labels that we put in the shredder when the elections were combined and moved to January 5th
 
Last edited:
The problem with “citizen journalists” is they have no standards, no ethics, no guardrails around their “reporting”.
You can bet I’ll be saving this little tidbit for the right time, good sir. Always remember that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
 
You can bet I’ll be saving this little tidbit for the right time, good sir. Always remember that what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
Since I rarely give credence to “citizen journalists”, you can probably save that someplace that you don’t have to get to very often. 😀
 
48.png
PaulinVA:
they have no standards, no ethics, no guardrails around their “reporting”.
Which journalists do?
Mail-in ballots were to have safeguards. There was a great deal that was unethical. Remember they promised they would have 24/7 video on dropboxes and they would log who had the keys to them at all times., the access. They allowed the ballots to be separated from the envelopes with the signatures on them.

People are skeptical.
 
Last edited:
Mail-in ballots were to have safeguards. There was a great deal that was unethical. Remember they promised they would have 24/7 video on dropboxes and they would log who had the keys to them at all times., the access.

People are skeptical.
No, the losers are skeptical.
 
this was a routine clean-up operation and they could come to inspect our stored materials if they wished.”
On the one hand it sounds like they are assuming no evidence was added to the material which is normally expected to be shredded - quite an assumption under the circumstances. And on the other hand they invite, presumably after the fact, an inspection. If there was foul play, this reassurance about the shredding doesn’t carry much weight. Its very nature makes it particularly vulnerable - once items are slipped into these locked boxes, it can no longer be casually observed.
 
Last edited:
48.png
gam197:
Mail-in ballots were to have safeguards. There was a great deal that was unethical. Remember they promised they would have 24/7 video on dropboxes and they would log who had the keys to them at all times., the access.
People are skeptical.
No, the losers are skeptical.
Mark Zuckerberg funneled 400 million into the 2020 election.

Cobb County was one of the areas where Zuckerberg funneled 5.6 million dollars and Fulton County got 6 million through private group, the Center for Technology and Civic Life.

All correspondence should be kept.

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.) (Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Last edited:
Mark Zuckerberg funneled 400 million into the 2020 election.

Cobb County was one of the areas where Zuckerberg funneled 5.6 million dollars and Fulton County got 6 million through private groups, such as Center for Technology and Civic Life.
This has what to do with counting ballots?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top