V
ventura2323
Guest
Your last comment was ‘have you been put to sleep or what?’ which is what we term an ‘ad-hominem’ which means ‘to the person’. That is by definition a personal attack and violates all the principles of a rational debate, it makes your argument logically fallacious (flawed) and demonstrates a lack of decorum. When you are evaluating a Philosophical argument; attack its premises and content and not the person making it.
First of all: Satan by nature is good, this is by virtue of the fact that he exists. Anything that exists has the source of its existence in God, that means everything by the sheer fact of its existence is Good. Notice I am not using ‘Good’ in the ethical sense, but in the ontological sense- as in the nature of Being or existence. Therefore Satan is not a pure evil by the sheer fact of his existence- his most inherent nature is still Good. He has just freely chosen to act contrary to the Will of God therefore making his actions a total ‘privation of Good’ but this doesn’t mean evil has a metaphysical existence.
If Evil had a metaphysical existence, that would mean that the nature of existence itself is not Good, and therefore our conception of God is conceptually false as it is inherently contradictory. I am not the source of this argument, I am paraphrasing Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologica
Since you say that satan is good, how would you like to spend eternity with him?
I have no idea where you are coming from.