God Has a Body (Flesh & Blood) Is That a Mormon Teaching?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Exporter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
BJ, now that I’ve answered your question about the marriage issue, I would like you to answer one of mine from a while back that you never really responded to. I asked you why you believe that there are other gods for other worlds. Why not believe that God the Father is the only god for all worlds for all eternity?
 
BJ, I am awfully sad that somehow you missed my post enumerating all the positive traits that I admire the Mormons for.

But when it comes right down to it, Catholics do not believe in relativism, that as long as we all beleive in some kind of God or other that is all that matters regardless of how we differ otherwise.

We beleive in absolutes that are non-negotiable.

We beleive in ONE God in the Holy Trinity, not the only God we worship, but the only God to exist.
 
Chris Wa
I really have never read what you have read about the other gods of other worlds, I only know that God the Father is the God of this universe and the only God that I personally know of. I have searched my personal library for any reference to other gods, but cannot find any books in my possession which refer to other gods. All I found was from Discourses of Brigham Young, pp 18-23 “God is the one supreme and absoulute being in whom we believe and whom we worship. He is the Creator, Ruler, and Preserver of all things.”
I do not personally know any Mormons who believe other than the above and the thing about other gods is not taught, but since your people had references to that, I expect there are writings somewhere by McConkie or someone like that about such a thing. I mostly read the Bible and Book of Mormon, and try to stick to scripture. I am not a student of the scriptures, but am trying to get in the habit of study. Unfortunately when I was young I was bored to tears by scripture study, and did not pay attention. I will search some more and see if I can find the reference some of the people in this forum were talking about. If I find it in official church writings I will let you know. I’m sure some of the references written by the persons in this forum are valid, I just don’t own and have never read any of those books.
I do not want to get into anti-Mormon literature, so I will search my own sources and let you know. Did you ask your wife? I would like to know what she thinks.
 
BJ Colbert:
I do not want to get into anti-Mormon literature, so I will search my own sources and let you know. Did you ask your wife? I would like to know what she thinks.
Just so you’ll know, BJ: All of the quotes cited in this thread ARE from official LDS sources. They are all from either:

LDS “scripture” (B of M, D & C, P of GP)

or from

Books, magazines, newspapers, priesthood manuals, sunday school manuals, tracts, etc. which are written by LDS General Authorities, approved by the 1st presidency and published by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.

No “anti-mormon” literature has been quoted.

Respectfully,
Paul
 
BJ Colbert:
I really have never read . . .about the other gods of other worlds.
Mrs. Colbert, how is it possible that you have never heard this basic Mormon doctrine? It is stated clearly in the teachings of the LDS (Mormon) church that the “trinity” consists of three separate gods – Father, Son, and Spirit – and that the “god of earth” (Heavenly Father) is among many gods in the universe.

It is also Mormon teaching that every Mormon male who meets the requirements will be “exalted” and will become a god and rule over his own planet, where he will have “spirit children” without number through sexual intercourse with his goddess-wife. That’s the purpose of “sealing” couples in the temple – so they will be together after death when he is “exalted.” The wife can’t get to be a “goddess” without her husband. You know about these “gods” don’t you?

I don’t doubt you, I’m just trying to figure out how a member could not know the teaching of the her own church when its so widely known within and without the church.

JMJ Jay
 
BJ Colbert:
Chris Wa
I really have never read what you have read about the other gods of other worlds, I only know that God the Father is the God of this universe and the only God that I personally know of. I have searched my personal library for any reference to other gods, but cannot find any books in my possession which refer to other gods.
BJ, here is an section from Joseph Smith’s King Follet Sermon (Sunday, April 7, 1844*)*, as printed in History of the Church, Vol. 6, p. 302-317. I will let it speak for itself.
Code:
"I will go back to the beginning before the world was, to show what kind of a being God is. What sort of a being was God in the beginning? Open your ears and hear, all ye ends of the earth, for I am going to prove it to you by the Bible, and to tell you the designs of God in relation to the human race, and why He interferes with the affairs of man.
God himself was Once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens! That is the great secret. If the veil were rent today, and the great God who holds this world in its orbit, and who upholds all worlds and all things by His power, was to make himself visible,—I say, if you were to see him today, you would see him like a man in form like yourselves in all the person, image, and very form as a man; for Adam was created in the very fashion, image and likeness of God, and received instruction from, and walked, talked and conversed with Him, as one man talks and communes with another.
Code:
In order to understand the subject of the dead, for consolation of those who mourn for the loss of their friends, it is necessary we should understand the character and being of God and how He came to be so; for I am going to tell you how God came to be God. We have imagined and supposed that God was God from all eternity. I will refute that idea, and take away the veil, so that you may see.

These are incomprehensible ideas to some, but they are simple. It is the first principle of the gospel to know for a certainty the character of God, and to know that we may converse with Him as one man converses with another, and that He was once a man like us; yea, that God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ Himself did; and I will show it from the Bible.
I wish I was in a suitable place to tell it, and that I had the trump of an archangel, so that I could tell the story in such a manner that persecution would cease forever. What did Jesus say? (Mark it, Elder Rigdon!) The scriptures inform us that Jesus said, as the Father hath power in himself, even so hath the Son power— to do what? Why, what the Father did. The answer is obvious—in a manner to lay down his body and take it up again. Jesus, what are you going to do? To lay down my life as my Father did, and take it up again. Do you believe it? If you do not believe it you do not believe the Bible. The scriptures say it, and I defy all the learning and wisdom and all the combined powers of earth and hell together to refute it. Here, then, is eternal life—to know the only wise and true God; and you have got to learn how to be gods yourselves, and to be kings and priests to God, the same as all gods have done before you, namely, by going from one small degree to another, and from a small capacity to a great one; from grace to grace, from exaltation to exaltation, until you attain to the resurrection of the dead, and are able to dwell in everlasting burnings, and to sit in glory, as do those who sit enthroned in everlasting power. And I want you to know that God, in the last days, while certain individuals are proclaiming His name, is not trifling with you or me."

(see next post for rest of section)
 
(King Follet Sermon cont.)

"These are the first principles of consolation. How consoling to the mourners when they are called to part with a husband, wife, father, mother, child, or dear relative, to know that, although the earthly tabernacle is laid down and dissolved, they shall rise again to dwell in everlasting burnings in immortal glory, not to sorrow, suffer, or die any more, but they shall be heirs of God and joint heirs with Jesus Christ. What is it? To inherit the same power, the same glory and the same exaltation, until you arrive at the station of a god, and ascend the throne of eternal power, the same as those who have gone before. What did Jesus do? Why, I do the things I saw my Father do when worlds came rolling into existence. My Father worked out His kingdom with fear and trembling, and I must do the same; and when I get my kingdom, I shall present it to My Father, so that He may obtain kingdom upon kingdom, and it will exalt Him in glory. He will then take a higher exaltation, and I will take His place, and thereby become exalted myself. So that Jesus treads in the tracks of His Father, and inherits what God did before; and God is thus glorified and exalted in the salvation and exaltation of all His children. It is plain beyond disputation, and you thus learn some of the first principles of the gospel, about which so much hath been said.
Code:
When you climb up a ladder, you must begin at the bottom, and ascend step by step, until you arrive at the top; and so it is with the principles of the gospel—you must begin with the first, and go on until you learn all the principles of exaltation. But it will be a great while after you have passed through the veil before you will have learned them. It is not all to be comprehended in this world; it will be a great work to learn our salvation and exaltation even beyond the grave. I suppose I am not allowed to go into an investigation of anything that is not contained in the Bible. If I do, I think there are so many over-wise men here that they would cry "treason" and put me to death. So I will go to the old Bible and turn commentator today.
I shall comment on the very first Hebrew word in the Bible; I will make a comment on the very first sentence of the history of creation in the Bible—Berosheit. I want to analyze the word. Baith—in, by, through, and everything else. Roch—the head, Sheit—grammatical termination. When the inspired man wrote it, he did not put the baith there. An old Jew without any authority added the word; he thought it too bad to begin to talk about the head! It read first, "The head one of the Gods brought forth the Gods." That is the true meaning of the words. Baurau signifies to bring forth. If you do not believe it, you do not believe the learned man of God. Learned men can teach you no more than what I have told you. Thus the head God brought forth the Gods in the grand council.

I will transpose and simplify it in the English language. Oh, ye lawyers, ye doctors, and ye priests, who have persecuted me, I want to let you know that the Holy Ghost knows something as well as you do. The head God called together the Gods and sat in grand council to bring forth the world. The grand councilors sat at the head in yonder heavens and contemplated the creation of the worlds which were created at the time. When I say doctors and lawyers, I mean the doctors and lawyers of the scriptures. I have done so hitherto without explanation, to let the lawyers flutter and everybody laugh at them. Some learned doctors might take a notion to say the scriptures say thus and so; and we must believe the scriptures; they are not to be altered. But I am going to show you an error in them."
Clearly in this excerpt, Joseph Smith discusses the existence of other gods, the idea that God was once a man, the idea that man can become a god, and the idea that God the Father is eternally progressing.
 
Thank You for the great extent of your research, I am going to purchase that book. I have one of our past lesson books which also points out from Hebrews 12:9 that God is the father of our spirits, 1 Corinthians 15:44 spiritual and temporal creations and many more references to premortal or spiritual lives and the plan for progression. Revelation 12:7-9 tells of the war in Heaven and Isaiah 14:12-15 tells why Lucifer was cast out.
Job 38:7 God is speaking to Job and asks where he was when the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy. There are many other scriptural references which clarify that we are the spirit children of God and that He has worlds without end, but of course they are in the Book of Mormon and D & C which is not believed by you, so that is not possible to reference. I am trying to speak only of Biblical references.
Code:
Here is also a further explanation of what the First Principles of the Gospel are,,,
Faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, repentance, baptism by emersion, and the laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost. These truths were returned in their fullness when the Church was restored.
Thank you for starting me in this search, I have really been lax in study of scripture for many years, this is bringing back a lot I had forgotten when I was out of the LDS church for 20 years. It is a very good excercise for my mind.
As I was thinking last evening about your last writing, it came into my mind about the 9th Article of Faith of the LDS Church. “We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God.”
You see one of the greatest differences between Mormons and the other religions. That being, we believe that through His Prophets, God constantly enlightens us and gives further guidance and knowledge. He did not abandon us in biblical times never to be heard from again. Since Joseph Smith was a Prophet, God gave him more knowledge. That sounds strange and blasphemes to those who believe that God said everything He had to say through the prohets of old and then stopped . To me it sounds perfectly logical that He would continue to give instruction to us His children as we can understand it, not all at once, but as we progress in knowlege and understanding. It is illogical to me that He would abandon us.
Having been gone from the church for so long, when I came back I was like a baby just beginning to learn, and now maybe I am to the point of a teenager not even as far advanced as the missionaries of our church. Just so you know you are talking to someone who has to rely on prayer and the Spirit for guidance .
When I was 8 years old I memorized the Articles of Faith and when I read your post, the 9th article came back to my memory.
I looked through past lesson books from church and found one called Gospel Principles first published in 1978 and last in 1997.
It has answers to many of the things we are talking about to include, that resurrected beings are made of Flesh and Bone, not Flesh and Blood.
 
BJ Colbert:
You see one of the greatest differences between Mormons and the other religions. That being, we believe that through His Prophets, God constantly enlightens us and gives further guidance and knowledge. He did not abandon us in biblical times never to be heard from again.
Catholics don’t believe that “God abandoned us” in biblical times. That is one of those Mormon “big lies”. We believe that Jesus has continually guided His Church through the Holy Spirit, just as Jesus promised He would. (cf. Matt 28:20; John 15:26; John 16:13)
BJ Colbert:
It has answers to many of the things we are talking about to include, that resurrected beings are made of Flesh and Bone, not Flesh and Blood.
Glad you finally agree with me. All of the other things I posted about LDS beliefs are true as well.
God bless,
Paul
 
You see one of the greatest differences between Mormons and the other religions. That being, we believe that through His Prophets, God constantly enlightens us and gives further guidance and knowledge. He did not abandon us in biblical times never to be heard from again. Since Joseph Smith was a Prophet, God gave him more knowledge. That sounds strange and blasphemes to those who believe that God said everything He had to say through the prohets of old and then stopped . To me it sounds perfectly logical that He would continue to give instruction to us His children as we can understand it, not all at once, but as we progress in knowlege and understanding. It is illogical to me that He would abandon us.
BJ, if you believe that God continues to reveal truths through your prophet, then could you please explain this from the Bible?

“God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds” Hebrews 1:1-2.

Seems to me that the writer of Hebrews is contradicting your beliefs.
 
BJ Colbert:
As I was thinking last evening about your last writing, it came into my mind about the 9th Article of Faith of the LDS Church. “We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God.”
You see one of the greatest differences between Mormons and the other religions. That being, we believe that through His Prophets, God constantly enlightens us and gives further guidance and knowledge. He did not abandon us in biblical times never to be heard from again. Since Joseph Smith was a Prophet, God gave him more knowledge. That sounds strange and blasphemes to those who believe that God said everything He had to say through the prohets of old and then stopped . To me it sounds perfectly logical that He would continue to give instruction to us His children as we can understand it, not all at once, but as we progress in knowlege and understanding. It is illogical to me that He would abandon us.
BJ, in response to this part of your post, I realize that one of the LDS arguments for continuing revelation is the notion that without more public revelation, God would in effect be abandoning us. The LDS seem to equate the lack of new revelation with abandonment by God. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Catholics believe that Christ established a church that would be guided into all truth and never abandoned, under the constant protection of the Holy Spirit. As a Mormon, you would have to believe that God did abandon us for 1700 years.

So why do Catholics believe that public revelation ceased with the Apostles? Let me quote from the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraphs 65-66.
65 "In many ways and various ways God spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son."26 Christ, the Son of God made man, is the Father’s one, perfect, and unsurpassable Word. In him he has said everything; there will be no other word than this one. St. John of the Cross, among others, commented strikingly on Hebrews 1:1-2:
In giving us his Son, his only Word (for he posseses no other), he spoke everything to us at once in this sole Word–and he has no more to say…because what he spoke before to the prophets in parts, he has now spoken all at once by giving us the All Who is His Son. Any person questioning God or desiring some vision or revelation would be guilty not only of foolish behavior but also of offending him, by not fixing his eyes entirely upon Christ and by living with the desire for some other novelty.27
66 "The Christian economy, therefore, since it is the new and definitive Covenant, will never pass away; and no new public revelation is to be expected before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ."28 Yet even if Revelation is already complete, it has not been made completely explicit; it remains for Christian faith gradually to grasp its full significance over the course of the centuries.
 
40.png
boppysbud:
BJ, I hate no-one. In fact I have great respect for the mormons on several points.

They absolutely love their families and are greatly devoted to them. They have a great welfare system. They are more devoted to their church than anyone I know, spend by far the greatest ammount of time in their chapels and in church related activites. They probably give the greatest amount of their money to their church with tithing, fast and testimony Sunday offerings, and other offerings.

But there are real differences between the mormon and Christian views about God, Jesus Christ, and the Trinity.

Witnessing to those differences is not the same as “hating the mormons”, it is just a realistic look at the differences between both religious bodies.
I just wanted you to know I did see your post and appreciate the kind remarks. Thank you
 
40.png
boppysbud:
BJ, I hate no-one. In fact I have great respect for the mormons on several points.

They absolutely love their families and are greatly devoted to them. They have a great welfare system. They are more devoted to their church than anyone I know, spend by far the greatest ammount of time in their chapels and in church related activites. They probably give the greatest amount of their money to their church with tithing, fast and testimony Sunday offerings, and other offerings.

But there are real differences between the mormon and Christian views about God, Jesus Christ, and the Trinity.

Witnessing to those differences is not the same as “hating the mormons”, it is just a realistic look at the differences between both religious bodies.
I just wanted you to know I did see your post and appreciate the kind remarks. Thank you
 
That sounds strange and blasphemes to those who believe that God said everything He had to say through the prohets of old and then stopped .
If I can clarify, we do not believe God stopped speaking to us. He continues to speak to us, through His Eternal Word. We need no new prophets because the Word of God continues to speak to His Holy Church, He continues to express the same deposit of faith delivered “once and for all” to the saints. (cf. Jude 3)

We do not believe the deposit of faith spoken of in the Epistle of Jude was incomplete. We believe it lacked nothing necessary to attain eternal life. It was truly “for all” as is asserted by Sacred Scripture.

But that doesn’t mean Christ has stopped speaking to us of this one deposit of faith, helping us to grow in our understanding of it. Christ never abandoned his Church, not even temporarily.
 
40.png
boppysbud:
Where to begin BJ. I am a former Mormon for several years. I was ordained in the Aaronic Priesthood, Home taught, and was a sunday school teacher, and I know exactly what I am talking about. Yes some mormons give lip service to the cross, but vastly emphasise the garden of Gethsemene at the exspense of the cross. Have you ever seen a cross in or on a mormon chapel or temple? And one thing I forgot to mention is that mormons redefine the word “attone” to mean that people will be ressurected, and define what everyone else terms attone to mean exhalted to be a “god” by obeying the mormon commandments.

You make think it makes no difference how many Gods people believe to exist, but it makes a huge difference as to whether they are Christians or members of a non-Christian cult that uses some of the same words as Christianity such as God and Jesus Christ, but redefines them. And mormons redefine everything from Christianity, the Christian Trinity of one God in three persons into a “godhead” of three seperate “gods”, to the nature of God the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit (not ghost).

You say that the mormon “god” is the same as the Christian God, and the mormon “jesus” is the same as the Christian Jesus.

Nothing could be further from the truth. I suppose I could put things a little more diplomatically, like calling Mormons Latter Day “Saints”, but I prefer the truth to diplomacy.
If you were indeed a Mormon, you would know that it is the Melchezidek(Spelling?) which is held by adult men over 18 years old, and the Aronic which is held by boys 12-18. Elder is the first office of the Melchezidek Priesthood, and Elder is where most LDS men are until they die, unless they are called to be a Bishop(Bishops act as head of a congregation) or 70(part of the administration of the Church) or Apostle(there are 12) or The Prophet(President of the Church).
This is just to clarify your misunderstanding of the order of the Priesthood.
Also, even though we believe Jesus suffered in Gethsemene and suffered, bled and died upon the cross to attone for our sins. We prefer to emphasize the good news of His Resurrection. We never forget His Atonement for our sins and how He suffered on the cross, but the hope of the world is the resurrection. We remember His sacrifice and renew our baptisimal covenants through the Sacrament which represents His Body and Blood and His sacrifice for us, every Sunday. We do not need to have statues and crosses to remember Him. It is in our hearts and minds every hour of every day as we strive to keep His commandments, and pray for forgiveness for our sins.
 
BJ Colbert:
Also, even though we believe Jesus suffered in Gethsemene and suffered, bled and died upon the cross to attone for our sins. We prefer to emphasize the good news of His Resurrection. We never forget His Atonement for our sins and how He suffered on the cross, but the hope of the world is the resurrection. We remember His sacrifice and renew our baptisimal covenants through the Sacrament which represents His Body and Blood and His sacrifice for us, every Sunday. We do not need to have statues and crosses to remember Him. It is in our hearts and minds every hour of every day as we strive to keep His commandments, and pray for forgiveness for our sins.
We also hold with great signifcance the good news of the resurrection! However, it is also important to remember how Jesus got to the ressurection - which is through His suffering and death. Had Jesus not suffered and died, there would have been no ressurection! They are inextricably related, you can’t have one without the other! I also think it’s important to remember that Jesus DIED for our sins. He was not ressurected for our sins. So if we don’t pay due respect to Jesus’ sacrifice, we are not acknowledging His wonderful gift to us. Holding one in higher esteem discounts the other.

In terms of statues, etc. There is currently an LDS temple being built in the town I live in and the building is set to have a statue (it looks like a rather large statue) of Moroni on the top of the temple. Why a statue of Moroni instead of a statue of Jesus? Is Jesus not infinitely more important than Moroni??? I’m not saying the statue is wrong, because obviously us Catholics have statues of many saints, however, your statement that you need no reminder of Jesus because He is in your heart, would lend one to think that you don’t need statues of anyone because they are in your heart.
 
BJ Colbert:
Also, even though we believe Jesus suffered in Gethsemene and suffered, bled and died upon the cross to attone for our sins. We prefer to emphasize the good news of His Resurrection.
Dear BJ,
Your difference of belief is not only with the Catholic Church, but with the bible.

1 Corinthians 1:23
but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and to Gentiles foolishness,

1 Corinthians 2:2
For I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.

Galatians 3:1
You foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified?

Grace to you,
Paul (who wonders if the Galatians had crucifixes)
 
40.png
tkdnick:
We also hold with great signifcance the good news of the resurrection! However, it is also important to remember how Jesus got to the ressurection - which is through His suffering and death. Had Jesus not suffered and died, there would have been no ressurection! They are inextricably related, you can’t have one without the other! I also think it’s important to remember that Jesus DIED for our sins. He was not ressurected for our sins. So if we don’t pay due respect to Jesus’ sacrifice, we are not acknowledging His wonderful gift to us. Holding one in higher esteem discounts the other.

In terms of statues, etc. There is currently an LDS temple being built in the town I live in and the building is set to have a statue (it looks like a rather large statue) of Moroni on the top of the temple. Why a statue of Moroni instead of a statue of Jesus? Is Jesus not infinitely more important than Moroni??? I’m not saying the statue is wrong, because obviously us Catholics have statues of many saints, however, your statement that you need no reminder of Jesus because He is in your heart, would lend one to think that you don’t need statues of anyone because they are in your heart.
You didn’t understand, I meant that the suffering, and sacrifice Jesus made on the cross is all tied together with the resurrection and therefore equally important. We remember all with equal importance because without one we would not have the other. Boppysbud had pointed out that we think Gethsemene was the most important event and I was saying that they all are important to us. We remember especially every time we take the Sacrament, which represents the Body and Blood of Christ. And you are right all of our Temples have the statue of Moroni on top of the Steeple, and we have paintings of Jesus in our Chapels or meeting houses.
So you are right to say we have things to remind us of Jesus. People always ask why we don’t have statues, and as you have pointed out we do have on our Temple steeples and there are statues of Jesus in the Visitor Centers of our Temples. I hope I have clarified my point a little better.
 
We have wandered way off of the subject, and I have been reading. So now have a little more to offer on the subject of Jesus having a body of flesh and bone. In Matthew 28:3,5-6 an angel of the Lord had descended from heaven and was sitting on the stone that he had rolled back from the door "His countenance was like lightening and his raiment white as snow…And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was cruicified. He is not here; for He is risen as He said. Come see the place where the Lord lay.
Following his resurrection, Jesus appeared to many. While the eleven apostles were gathered together at Jerusalem discussing what had happened, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit. And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have. Luke 24:36-39
To further prove he had his body, he took a piece of broiled fish and of honeycomb and did eat before them.
With his resurrected body he ascended to heaven in the presence of five hundred brethren: "he was seen of five hundred brethren at once…"1 Corinthians 15:6.
His apostles saw him ascend into heaven and the “two men stood by them in white apparel"affirmed the fact:
And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel”; Which also said, ye men of Galilee why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven(Acts 1:10-11)
If Jesus is one in spirit with his Father, without body or form, so large that he fills the universe and so small that he dwells in each heart, as so many believe and as the churches teach, then what meaning has the resurrection which is commemorated each Easter in the Christian churches, and what did he do with his body after he showed it to his apostles and others?
I think we have thoroughly discussed this topic and we all agree to disagree. Thank you all for a lively and educational experience for me. I learned a lot and hopefully will continue to study as you have encouraged me to do.
 
BJ Colbert:
You didn’t understand, I meant that the suffering, and sacrifice Jesus made on the cross is all tied together with the resurrection and therefore equally important. We remember all with equal importance because without one we would not have the other. Boppysbud had pointed out that we think Gethsemene was the most important event and I was saying that they all are important to us. We remember especially every time we take the Sacrament, which represents the Body and Blood of Christ. And you are right all of our Temples have the statue of Moroni on top of the Steeple, and we have paintings of Jesus in our Chapels or meeting houses.
So you are right to say we have things to remind us of Jesus. People always ask why we don’t have statues, and as you have pointed out we do have on our Temple steeples and there are statues of Jesus in the Visitor Centers of our Temples. I hope I have clarified my point a little better.
Thanks, got it now. One question though…Why a statue of Moroni on top of all your temples? I know Moroni was important in the historical beliefs of LDS members, but aren’t there more important people that could be “statued”? I’m thinking like JESUS, St. Paul, Joseph Smith (in your belief system)…and if GOD has a body, and we know what He looks like…why isn’t there a statue of GOD on top of every temple? That just seems A LOT more logical to me. Course, maybe that’s because I’m Catholic and not LDS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top