D
deb1
Guest
First let me begin by saying that I am not frigid. I have a pretty good libido for a forty year old woman. I don’t dislike sex or anything like that.
But I have been surprised by some of the posters who seem to think that living without sex is either an impossibility or cruelty.
I noticed this first attitude, first when talking to those who suffer from same sex attraction. In my eyes the Church’s stance is very loving. If you are homosexual and can not help being attracted to the members of your own sex then you must refrain from having sex but you, yourself, are not evil or bad. It is the act of homosexuality that is wrong not the involuntary attraction.
Yet suggesting that such people live without sex is sometimes geeted with anger and the accusation of judgmentalism.
Then there was another poster who married his wife and was not able to get an annulement. It was suggested that the poster live chastly with his wife until he could rectify his situation.
the poster got very frustrated at the suggestion that he do without sex, even for a time. I don’t understand this attitude.
there are so many worse crosses to bear then living without sex.
Yes, going without sex would be difficult. If my hubby returned from Afghanistan with some sort of horrible injury that left him impotent, I would not have an easy time, but I certainly wouldn’t leave him, or stop loving him. He means much more to me then any physical desire that I have for him.
I guess I don’t understand why people get so upset over the suggestion that not having sex might be the answer-even temporarily- to their problems.
Surely not having sex isn’t the worse thing that could happen to a person.
But I have been surprised by some of the posters who seem to think that living without sex is either an impossibility or cruelty.
I noticed this first attitude, first when talking to those who suffer from same sex attraction. In my eyes the Church’s stance is very loving. If you are homosexual and can not help being attracted to the members of your own sex then you must refrain from having sex but you, yourself, are not evil or bad. It is the act of homosexuality that is wrong not the involuntary attraction.
Yet suggesting that such people live without sex is sometimes geeted with anger and the accusation of judgmentalism.
Then there was another poster who married his wife and was not able to get an annulement. It was suggested that the poster live chastly with his wife until he could rectify his situation.
the poster got very frustrated at the suggestion that he do without sex, even for a time. I don’t understand this attitude.
there are so many worse crosses to bear then living without sex.
Yes, going without sex would be difficult. If my hubby returned from Afghanistan with some sort of horrible injury that left him impotent, I would not have an easy time, but I certainly wouldn’t leave him, or stop loving him. He means much more to me then any physical desire that I have for him.
I guess I don’t understand why people get so upset over the suggestion that not having sex might be the answer-even temporarily- to their problems.