Gun Carrying Catholics Armed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seagull
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Title 10 Sections 12304 and possibly 332 give the President plenty of authority over any National Guard or Air Guard component above and beyond that of the governor.

She might want to brush up on it. There’s no questions.

And he doesn’t necessarily need her consent. They’re fundamentally not her forces once they’ve been conscripted by the Feds.
 
Last edited:
Seeksadvice said:
Brendan - depending on the configuration, the bolt gun will produce higher muzzle velocities and better accuracy due to barrel length and lack of monkey-motion due to the auto-loading feature of the AR.
Click to expand...
Understood. But change in fps between a bolt gun and a semi at the muzzle is pretty negliable. I remember seeing an article where the instructor had an FAL with an adjustable gas value. They chronoed the round full gas and at gas shutoff. The difference was an average of 30 fps.

I fully agree on the accuracy. For the same round and the same barrel length, not having things moving in your firearm adds to accuracy 😃
 
Guns don’t bother me. I don’t happen to have one right now but that’s because of practical reasons not related to morality, Catholicism, “gun control” etc.
 
Lol. I actually used to keep my M1 loaded at bedside because I didn’t have enough skill with a pistol yet. If someone ever did break in, I’m not sure I could bring myself to fire it. I like my hearing too much. 😜
 
i"m 17 atm, but I hope to get something simple and surplus when i’m legal- maybe a Mosin/Arisaka/1903 springfield
 
?

My response was to the comment about not having a Walther. I don’t own a PPK because I’m not James Bond 🙂
 
Actually, I was wrong on that. The true FAL is a select fire battle rifle.
 
No. No way.
For one thing, I would constantly feel its presence and be anxious about possibly having to use it. I’d obsess over all the potential threats. It would be a constant reminder of all the bad things, a few real but the overwhelming majority imagined, that might happen. Every bump in the dark would be a villain breaking into my house.

What was that noise? Did you hear it? Should I check on it? If I check on it, should I carry the gun with me?

I’d never feel safe.

Instead, I live in a messy house. Anyone who would break in would probably break an ankle in the dark. I feel safe.
 
jgaw1234 said:
Lol. I actually used to keep my M1 loaded at bedside because I didn’t have enough skill with a pistol yet. If someone ever did break in, I’m not sure I could bring myself to fire it. I like my hearing too much. 😜
Click to expand...
My thought is that the second they see it, firing it either becomes secondary (“uh, sorry, wrong house”) or necessary (“whatcha got there, cutie?”). 😂😂😂
 
Not really a James Bond fan, myself, but PPQ for ambidextrous -friendly (injury to the medial nerve of my right hand–which leaves my index and middle finger sometimes “balky” for a lack of better word, the fingers just don’t necessarily work–I’ve always been concerned about if there were a non-target shooting need … and as a woman who is currently a protected party under an order of protection, I’m not exactly paranoid when I believe that I may need to defend myself–he’s already done time once for violating a prior order, and everyone knows that “legally can’t get a gun” does not equal “can’t get a gun”).
 
Last edited:
Apparently Catholicism encompasses more opinions about weapons than your narrow interpretation.

Pacifists may only live under the shield of those who are not.
 
One of those statements is inconsistent with the other 2 and it involves a sin that cries out to God for vengeance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top