Gun Carrying Catholics Armed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seagull
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Ender:
In the Kleck & Gertz study they noted that there were thirteen other studies relevant to the topic, and the lowest estimate of DGUs was 700k/yr. What you “know” to be true seems very different from what would appear to actually be true.
When the facts don’t support preconceived opinions, some just fall back on this tactic
My dear Lord, isn’t THAT the truth.

Oh…

We’re talking about differen’t people, aren’t we?
 
I know this is going to throw of your stats but apparently bear maulings happen indoors as well… It’s just not safe to be home anymore… 😎

Man mauled to death by captive grizzly in Montana

 
Interesting you guys are still talking about this…

It would be pertinent to note that a “DGU” does not have to correspond with an actual crime. It only requires that the defender perceive a threat and report it and think their gun played some kind of role.

Before he passed, my uncle reported several of these in the last years of his life - .32 ACP in-hand. They were, without exception, kids who used his 1.1 mile driveway to test their cars/motorcycles; NOT the “street gangs” he suspected were scoping his house and trying to intimidate him.

His reports still would have met the criteria of a “DGU”, unfortunately…
 
I know this is going to throw of your stats but apparently bear maulings happen indoors as well… It’s just not safe to be home anymore… 😎
Oh, and to be sure, there have been instances of a home invasion attempt where the targets weren’t home.

I guess they’re both stupid claims. 😎😘
 
If what you say is true, then more home invasions take place than the records reflect.

But this is really my worst fear… 😎

 
If what you say is true, then more home invasions take place than the records reflect.
Oh no, I’m sure folks who try to record that stuff are well aware. Forced entry and subsequent rape would be considered a “home invasion”, even if there was no specific charge for that.
 
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Bear, meet .45-70.
.45-70, bear.
 
Relax Comrade. Bear is good friend of many peoples…

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
Last edited:
I do not have preconceived opinions on this. I live it. Guns are not used defensively a hundred, fifty, or even ten times, for every time they are used offensively. What I said earlier, and what has not been addressed, is that none of this supposed study, or the claims of the CDC cover-up has actually been documented, as in referenced where it can be seen and studied by all, including all in academia, for it veracity, even for its actual existence.

And only then does the problem with self-reporting become an issue, after the actual existence of this study is established independent of bloggers.

BTW - Another issue that always needs addressing is the worthlessness of any study designed to prove a political point. They always prove the point they intend, though such studies are not real science.
There are dozens of articles referring to the hidden CDC study; these are only a few from non-blogger sources.


https://thepoliticalinsider.com/cdc-gun-study-shocking-finding/


 
My dear Lord, isn’t THAT the truth.

Oh…

We’re talking about differen’t people, aren’t we?
You seem to imagine the CDC commissioned these studies with a pro-gun agenda, and then changed their minds after the research was completed. I find that approach very hard to believe, the CDC has never leaned right on this issue.

I think the CDC commissioned basic research, not with a pro-gun agenda, and were surprised by the results. Your interpretation is akin to putting your head in the sand.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top