Me, too. And I know men who have been victims of sexual harassment. It isn’t confined to women.Also, I am afraid of a society that uses the court of public opinion to punish someone who cannot be punished in a court of law due to lack of evidence, circumstantial evidence, or statute of limitations
I live in Los Angeles. I know that the more famous a person is, the more likely they are to feel they can “get away with it.” So does LE. I believe Bill Cosby is an abuser, but what I cannot fathom is WHY 50 women chose to advance their career rather than report his abuse.When someone is famous or well-respected, you hardly jump to the conclusion that the person is capable of something like that.
Absolutely true.Besides, as someone admitted earlier on in the thread, they are not even naming their alleged attackers or trying to go to the authorities. Therefore they either doing this for attention or trying to undermine due process. Both motivations are obviously problematic.
And the women who sexually harass? Or who make false accusations? I think they should wear name tags, too.I think they should all wear name tags, so I know to avoid them if I ever come across them IRL.
It’s not that vague. For example–is there reciprocity, or is one person doing all of the initiation while the other just sits there like a sack of potatoes?I wholeheartedly agree with the direction, but it’s pretty darn vague to say they must be equally ‘enthusiastic’ as a requirement.
There are more women going to jail for inappropriate conduct with boys than probably ever before.Young people have always had dumb ideas. The scary part is when they try to codify dumb ideas like this as law, eliminate any notion of female responsibility, and erase due process protections in order to enforce their unrealistic ideas about sex onto the population.
I feel like there are a number of other possibilities:Therefore they either doing this for attention or trying to undermine due process.
He seems to have started his career of drugging-and-raping in the 1960s. In the 1960s and 1970s, social attitudes were very different than they are today. It’s taken a really, really long time to get to where we are today. For examples, see how 1970s movies handle rape.I believe Bill Cosby is an abuser, but what I cannot fathom is WHY 50 women chose to advance their career rather than report his abuse.
You sure about that?They get far lighter sentences than if the genders were reversed. So much for prosecution to the full extent of the law.
Why do you think that is? Could it be that there is an attitude that it was a dream come true for the victim because what red blooded boy wouldn’t want to bang his hot teacher? I recently watched a video of adult men scoffing at the idea that a boy would think it was abuse. It’s a common theme in pop culture.They get far lighter sentences than if the genders were reversed. So much for prosecution to the full extent of the law.
That crime would probably be investigated or there would be some empathy…hang on have to google some tweets…You know, if I walked into a strip club, got blackout drunk and then woke up to discover that my smartwatch and wallet were missing, I doubt that I would get much sympathy from you and there would probably be some “victim-blaming” going on as well.
You sound concerned.Ah yeah, I bet those victims really appreciate the hashtags.
“raising awareness” sounds like a bid for attention to me.
“I was sexually assaulted but I did not go to the police and now I just posted the story 10 years later on social media with a hashtag and no real details,” does not exactly sound like the sort of thing that would intimidate a rapist.
There is a whole lot of grey area between what you describe (comatose) and both parties being ‘equally’ enthusiastic. Besides some people are highly expressive and some are more passive.It’s not that vague. For example–is there reciprocity, or is one person doing all of the initiation while the other just sits there like a sack of potatoes?