Hell exists BECAUSE God loves us!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mgoforth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’ll show you:

Well to answer your question: no, God does not judge us all “the same” in the sense of ignoring our situations. This is a clear teaching of the Church in the Catechism:

1860 *Unintentional ignorance can diminish or even remove the imputability of a grave offense. But no one is deemed to be ignorant of the principles of the moral law, which are written in the conscience of every man. The promptings of feelings and passions can also diminish the voluntary and free character of the offense, as can external pressures or pathological disorders. Sin committed through malice, by deliberate choice of evil, is the gravest. *

So that’s a straw man argument. All you have to do to prevent yourself from posting logical fallacies like this one is to learn about what you’re trying to attack.
No one is ignorant of the principles of the moral law? Well first of all I disagree with that because there are sociopaths that are ignorant of these principles, or at least cannot comprehend them. Also, there is a HUGE disagreement on what is right and what is wrong in the world. The great majority of people think rape is wrong, but things like masturbation, premarital sex, abortion, birth control, etc. are all debated. So if you know that people think these things are wrong, but don’t agree with them, does that make you ignorant?
 
And as I explained above, 😃 who exactly do you think that you are to demand to know everything? Your conception of God must not be very impressive if you don’t see the silliness in such a request. He is infinite. You and I are finite. That’s the key to understanding this. His knowledge literally will not fit inside our tiny little brains. It won’t fit inside the minds of angels who are the highest level of created beings. It won’t fit anywhere else but inside Him, because everywhere else is finite and He is, once again, in-finite.
But once you die you don’t become infinite? You don’t think you would be able to comprehend these things in heaven?
 
lol, ok. I guess that solves that problem.
There are lots of threads here explaining why Islam falls short of the Truth, but first and foremost it denies the divinity of Jesus Christ. That’s enough of a reason for me.
 
If hell was always just an absence of God, why wasn’t Dante tried for heresy for the inferno?
Clearly you don’t understand the implications of “just an absence of God”.

Just the absence of all goodness, all love, all truth, all beauty - no big deal, right? It’s obvious how those who value love, truth, goodness, beauty could view hell in Dante’s terms. But those who CHOOSE such an absence, who don’t value those things, may have a very different view.
 
Exactly my thoughts. Just because we have free will does not mean there has to be a hell.
What you are saying is that one can have free will and at the same time make choices that all result in the same outcome. I have the free will to choose between a green car or a red car or a blue car, and whatever I choose I will get a green car.
 
You act as though I don’t believe in the Church because of pride. I don’t believe in the Church because I view it as a 2,000 year old religion that was mostly spread by people that had never met Jesus and could not verify the claims that they were spreading.
Do you believe in God? Because it is Catholic teaching (and pagan teaching as well) that one can know of the existence of God through natural reason alone. Have you done that homework?
 
You act as though I don’t believe in the Church because of pride. I don’t believe in the Church because I view it as a 2,000 year old religion that was mostly spread by people that had never met Jesus and could not verify the claims that they were spreading.
What about the Apostles? All but one (St John) died as martyrs.

St Peter was crucified in Rome upside down because he didn’t feel worthy to die in the same way as our Lord.

St Andrew was crucified - bound instead of nailed to prolong his suffering - in the city of Patras.

St James the Greater was executed by the sword on the order of Herod Agrippa.

St Philip was also crucified upside down in Hierapolis.

St Bartholomew was flayed alive and crucified upside down in Albanopolis.

Ancient sources agree that St Matthew was executed but aren’t clear where or how.

St Thomas was stabbed to death with spears in India.

St James the Lesser was stoned by the Jews in Jerusalem.

St Jude was martyred in Persia with St Simon the Zealot.

St Matthias (the replacement for Judas Iscariot) was either crucified or stoned and beheaded.

And of course St Paul was beheaded in Rome during the reign of Nero.

So why would these 12 men, who all met Jesus Christ, willingly die for Him? Their faith in a man that they had personally interacted with, even to death, was a HUGE reason for the early growth of the Church. They are the ones you have to argue against.
 
No one is ignorant of the principles of the moral law? Well first of all I disagree with that because there are sociopaths that are ignorant of these principles, or at least cannot comprehend them. Also, there is a HUGE disagreement on what is right and what is wrong in the world. The great majority of people think rape is wrong, but things like masturbation, premarital sex, abortion, birth control, etc. are all debated. So if you know that people think these things are wrong, but don’t agree with them, does that make you ignorant?
No. Everyone knows that “things like masturbation, premarital sex, abortion, birth control”, etc are wrong. It’s written on our hearts. Why do we feel shame about them if we don’t think they’re wrong? I’m aware of cultural differences, but that doesn’t contradict the natural law.

Why aren’t people masturbating in the streets anywhere in the world? Or why isn’t abortion a spectator event anywhere in the world? People seek “privacy” for these things because they’re ashamed of them. Whether they have been instructed in the Christian faith or not, they know inherently that these are shameful acts that need to be carried out in secret.
 
But once you die you don’t become infinite? You don’t think you would be able to comprehend these things in heaven?
No, you don’t become infinite. Another popular misconception, even among Catholics. Only God is infinite, ever. We become immortal (actually our souls already are, but our bodies will be resurrected in immortal form as well) in Heaven and Hell. That just means that we won’t die. But we will not know everything. God by His grace will show us much, much more than we can understand now, but we won’t become God. We’ll still be creatures.
 
I just want to say thank you for being straight. I too, weary of the argument that God won’t send me to hell, I send myself to hell. Nope, if I end up in hell, it’s because God sent me there, no other reason. As I said before, no one in their right mind would pick hell.

I’ve no problem with the consistency of a Divine Justice damning me to hell and eternal punishment and torture to burn forever without relief in the agonizing flames of hell.

I have a huge problem with the idea I would pick such an option myself.

I appreciate the straight shooting from the hip. 👍

Sarah x 🙂
You choose with your actions, Sarah. This was discussed very recently in your own thread. Whether you want to believe that God sends you to Hell, or you send yourself there is only semantics. Both are true. When you say that you see no evidence for God, despite the abundant evidence He has provided in the life of His Son alone…that’s a choice.
 
What you are saying is that one can have free will and at the same time make choices that all result in the same outcome. I have the free will to choose between a green car or a red car or a blue car, and whatever I choose I will get a green car.
No what I am saying is that there is no reason for any action to send you to hell. Where is the logic in that? The argument seems to be “since you can choose to do whatever you want, some people will inevitably go to a place of eternal suffering and sorrow.” My question is WHY? Why does free will mean eternal suffering and sorrow for some? There is no real logic behind it.
 
What about the Apostles? All but one (St John) died as martyrs.

St Peter was crucified in Rome upside down because he didn’t feel worthy to die in the same way as our Lord.

St Andrew was crucified - bound instead of nailed to prolong his suffering - in the city of Patras.

St James the Greater was executed by the sword on the order of Herod Agrippa.

St Philip was also crucified upside down in Hierapolis.

St Bartholomew was flayed alive and crucified upside down in Albanopolis.

Ancient sources agree that St Matthew was executed but aren’t clear where or how.

St Thomas was stabbed to death with spears in India.

St James the Lesser was stoned by the Jews in Jerusalem.

St Jude was martyred in Persia with St Simon the Zealot.

St Matthias (the replacement for Judas Iscariot) was either crucified or stoned and beheaded.

And of course St Paul was beheaded in Rome during the reign of Nero.

So why would these 12 men, who all met Jesus Christ, willingly die for Him? Their faith in a man that they had personally interacted with, even to death, was a HUGE reason for the early growth of the Church. They are the ones you have to argue against.
Do you think that Jim Jones was right? Almost 1000 people committed suicide because of their beliefs in Jones, and they knew him.

And I also want to say that the way these apostles died are known because of church tradition. It is possible that they didn’t actually die this way.
 
No. Everyone knows that “things like masturbation, premarital sex, abortion, birth control”, etc are wrong. It’s written on our hearts. Why do we feel shame about them if we don’t think they’re wrong? I’m aware of cultural differences, but that doesn’t contradict the natural law.

Why aren’t people masturbating in the streets anywhere in the world? Or why isn’t abortion a spectator event anywhere in the world? People seek “privacy” for these things because they’re ashamed of them. Whether they have been instructed in the Christian faith or not, they know inherently that these are shameful acts that need to be carried out in secret.
I don’t poop in the road either. Is pooping wrong?
 
You choose with your actions, Sarah. This was discussed very recently in your own thread. Whether you want to believe that God sends you to Hell, or you send yourself there is only semantics. Both are true. When you say that you see no evidence for God, despite the abundant evidence He has provided in the life of His Son alone…that’s a choice.
Yes, people choose their actions. But it is up to God to figure out what to do with them. A loving God wouldn’t send people to eternal torment and I don’t know how you can say otherwise.
 
Do you think that Jim Jones was right? Almost 1000 people committed suicide because of their beliefs in Jones, and they knew him.

And I also want to say that the way these apostles died are known because of church tradition. It is possible that they didn’t actually die this way.
I’ve seen enough to tell me that your only interest, “interestedman”, is to attack the Church and make ridiculous comparisons. I’m done responding, but will continue to pray for you.
 
I’ve seen enough to tell me that your only interest, “interestedman”, is to attack the Church and make ridiculous comparisons. I’m done responding, but will continue to pray for you.
I wasn’t trying to make a comparison of Jim Jones to Jesus. I was just trying to say that just because people died for their beliefs does not make their beliefs right.
 
Nope.

Apart from the discussions I’ve had here about hell and eternal punishment for a finite crime as you described it, I’ve also brough up issues like Madelaine McCann, missing for years, family in unimaginable agony, prayed for by Catholics everywhere, vigils offered for her safe return on a daily basis, prayed for by the Pope (JPII) and … nothing. The family’s pain continues unabated and Madelaine remains missing. No loving all powerful all knowing personal Deity would ever allow such suffering to continue, in my opinion. Others obviously disagree and question my hubris and ask if I know more than God 🤷 Irrelevant to me in the face of the real pain and suffering of this family. The perps free will was not interfered with - the child was abducted - so I don’t see the block to an all loving God now revealing where the child is, to end the families suffering. But no … nothing. That’s just one example of many that convince me if there is a God, He’s certainly not an all loving one.

Agreed. Although, I wouldn’t argue I’m ignorant now of the claims of the Catholic Church, or the claims of Christianity or Islam in general - I would argue though I find myself unable to accept them.

Sarah x 🙂
First of all Madelaine McCann wasn’t prayed for by Pope John Paul II, at least not on Earth, because he died well before that. It was the current Holy Father. See this: metro.co.uk/news/50969-pope-prays-for-missing-maddy

Why is Madelaine McCann missing? Because some evil person took her to satisfy their own urges. That is what free will means, we all have a choice and we all have a responsibility. Why doesn’t God reveal things like the location of Madelaine McCann? That’s part of free will.

Can I try to explain it by an analogy with my own life? I have a very rare condition called Early-Onset Primary Erythromelalgia, I developed it at age 7. Erythromelalgia (EM) causes horrific pain, it’s like being in the hottest boiling oil that you can imagine and at the same time being stabbed with thousands of needles, from a fine injection one up to a huge knitting needle, and through those needles you’re being injected with boiling acid. It is absolutely horrific and at that time, about 50% of children under 12 diagnosed killed themselves to escape the pain.

About once a month, I would get an infection in my leg which would make the pain go off the scale. When that happened, my dad would phone a doctor and they would come out and give me an injection of pethidine, the drug then used on women in labour (although even at 7 I was getting 4 times that amount!). The pain would stop, I would fall asleep and that would allow the antibiotics to deal with the infection.

Now imagine that you’re a fly on my wall (or my pet hamster/cat if you prefer). You see all this and then you discover that my dad is a doctor. He actually has pethidine in his case downstairs! If it works when the pain is really bad, it’ll work on the normal pain. He could easily give me that every night and spare me hours of utter torment. If he has the drug and has the ability to give me it, why doesn’t he? What kind of loving father is that?

The reason my father didn’t give me the pethidine was because he loved me. He knew that if I had been given pethidine every night, I would quickly become addicted, that I would be drugged during the day which would affect my schooling, that it would prevent me doing anything and that I would need higher and higher doses to get the same effect, eventually they wouldn’t be able to increase the dose or they’d kill me. I cannot imagine the strength it took to see me in such awful pain and not give in to the temptation to give me pethidine, “just this once”. It must have almost destroyed him to be a doctor and not be able to stop your daughter’s pain.

God is like my dad, not giving us the pethidine of miracles. If we were to get miracles all the time, we’d come to depend on them, it would be an addiction. If there would always be a miracle to come along and get us out of the hole we got ourselves into, we’d never learn. There would be no consequences. We’d then lose our free will, at the extreme end, if you tried to kill someone, a miracle would come along to save them. Your free will is lost. Because our decisions always affect someone else, free will is gone. Then we’d need miracles more and more, until it would be asking for a miracle to get you through a traffic jam.

Finally, we’re not actually meant to be here forever. This is not our permanent home. As we have to die, it would cause pain and suffering to those left behind. They’d want miracles to stop us dying. Without the pain of lesser suffering, the pain of bereavement would be even worse than it is already. You’d have no coping mechanisms.

God is like my dad, He doesn’t help because he loves us, it must hurt Him terribly, but He knows that the results would be even worse than they are at the moment.

Why doesn’t God reveal where poor Madelaine McCann is? Because some scumbag out there already knows where she is and isn’t telling. I pray for Madelaine and her family every night. I cannot imagine the horrendous pain they’re suffering. I do believe that God can help them without a miracle, He can support and comfort them.

I hope that is some help in how God works, too many people see God as uncaring when He is anything but.
 
Yes, people choose their actions. But it is up to God to figure out what to do with them. A loving God wouldn’t send people to eternal torment and I don’t know how you can say otherwise.
What if they would be more tormented spending eternity with God?
 
What if they would be more tormented spending eternity with God?
Sorry, that doesn’t make sense. I have heard that argument too, but heaven is paradise. Is it not? And if heaven can be eternal torment than theoretically hell can be everlasting bliss. So maybe people that go to hell actually prefer it, and in that case it wouldn’t even be a punishment. That would go along with a loving God, but I don’t think it really makes much sense.
 

  1. *]Would you rather be a human being, who is able to make intellectual choices guided by reason, or an animal which is not?
    *]If you would rather be an animal, why?
    *]If you would rather be a human, why?
    *]In either case…congratulations! You just made an intellectual choice, which you would not be able to do as an animal. 😉

    For the sake of this argument, I’ll assume that most of us are happy being humans and wouldn’t choose to give up our intelligence and freedom of choice. This is one of the greatest gifts (although not the greatest of all) that God has given us - to be created in His image as a rational, thinking being.

    God loves us enough to grant us complete control over our lives, giving us the final say on every decision we make. God does not force us to do anything, because to love us completely demands that level of respect. He gives us our lives and sustains them continuously through the act of loving us…even as we commit sins and even if we decide that we don’t love Him in return. If God withdrew that love from us, even for an instant, we would literally drop dead. What an incredible act of humility and love on God’s part to show us such patience and to keep us alive while we insult Him constantly and repeatedly!

    So how does this show that Hell exists as a natural consequence of God’s love for us? Simply because God gave you and I the freedom to do anything, even to run away from Him and hide forever. To question the doctrine of an eternal Hell, separated from God’s presence, is to argue that God is trying to trick us when He claims that we have free will. To say that God should bring us to Heaven, even when we knowingly and willingly sin, is to say that God should pretend to offer us a completely free choice but then ignore our ultimate decision and force His eternal presence on us against our will.

    In other words, Hell is something God allows us to choose freely - even though He hopes that none of us will make that choice - because He loves us infinitely.

    :signofcross:

  1. Mgoforth:

    Well, I’m not sure about all of that, but, if you said that it is very natural for men and women to want to know that reasonable justice is meted out for crimes, then, Yes, God provides us a consistency in what we find ourselves immersed. If He didn’t love us, then there would be no retribution for unspeakable deeds. Thus, it wouldn’t matter a bit what we chose to do. And, we’d have no respect for the Lawgiver.

    God bless,
    jd
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top