M
MikeWM
Guest
Yes, ok, just like SatanA diamond studded cross around the neck of Hillary is like Satan saying, “look over hear all you Christians listen to me”
Mike
Yes, ok, just like SatanA diamond studded cross around the neck of Hillary is like Satan saying, “look over hear all you Christians listen to me”
Good for her. Hope it is a daily reminder to her of how much she supports that is contrary to the teachings of the Man who hung on that cross.blogs.nydailynews.com/dailypolitics/archives/2006/10/her_cross_to_be_1.php
Hillary photo op wearing Cross.
Haleluia Haleluia!
Well, actually she did something close to that when she donned a Star of David to win the Jewish vote in NY. Need I say more?Why on earth does anyone even care if she wears a cross? Surely they’re common enough as an item of jewellery, even among those without a religious persuasion.
If she wore a crescent moon now THAT would be news.
The sole purpose of the 95-10 initiative is to give cover to pro-abortion canidates. The initiative does absolutley NOTHING to stop aboortion.She is signing on to the 95-10 Initiative. This is a bill sponsored by Pro-Life Democrat Ben Nelson (NE).
Maybe, but we voters have to judge if she is reliable and truly on our side. She’s definitely not on the side of life, which is a major voting issue, so for her to pretend a faith she doesn’t actually believe in is nothing more than fraud and a bid to win votes, as she did when she wore a Star of David to win Jewish votes.I seem to remember Jesus saying something about splinters and planks of wood. I’d leave it up to God to decide if He’s being mocked.
Mike
If this gets out she will have a lot to answer for from the feminists and NOW people. This could hurt her./quote
Pro-aborts , feminists and NOW love 95-10. They know that it does nothing to limit abportion but provides a fig leaf for pro-abortion politicans to claim they support life.
For once I agree with Mike. I detest Hillary’s politics but she has as much right to wear a cross as anyone. I do not believe she is evil incarnate. Misguided, self centered, judgemental, wrong headed and egotistical yes but not evil. Just my opinion of her. I hope some of the anti-Bush people are willing to admit the same of him.Oh, that doesn’t apply to Hillary Clinton around hereThe same people who moan (erroneously) that people blame everything on President Bush are more than happy to say anything and everything unpleasant about Hillary Clinton. The same people who get so bothered because BA’s uniform doesn’t allow a cross, then go on and criticise other people for wearing one.
Mike
That’s a very good point. Something to ponder…She has stuck by her husband despite all that he did to her. She’s a better example of how marriage is supposed to work than most.Mike
Yes indeed, she has maken her views clear over the years through her works. Besides the things I mentioned in my previous post, look at all the wickedness she is responsible for:Wearing a cross has no meaning for me. Whether Stalin or Hillary wears a cross makes no difference. Her inclusion in “Bible Studies” also is meaningless. How many have perpetuated a life of piety, when they were truly wicked people? Judge her? What a waste of time. She has made her views clear over the years.
A cross does not a Christian make. Nor a bible either. A Christian shall be known by their works.
Well, actually she did something close to that when she donned a Star of David to win the Jewish vote in NY. Need I say more?
I agree. She’s done some good things as a US Senator, but she is definitely an abortion-on-demand politician, which is the criteria I find most compelling when voting for a national candidate in a bid for the presidency.For once I agree with Mike. I detest Hillary’s politics but she has as much right to wear a cross as anyone. I do not believe she is evil incarnate. Misguided, self centered, judgemental, wrong headed and egotistical yes but not evil. Just my opinion of her. I hope some of the anti-Bush people are willing to admit the same of him.
Are you saying that you support abortion?I agree. She’s done some good things as a US Senator, but she is definitely an abortion-on-demand politician, which is the criteria I find most compelling when voting for a national candidate in a bid for the presidency.
exactly. It is just like Satan to invoke the image of christ for his own agendaYes, ok, just like Satan
Mike
Only the States and the Courts can stop it. Hopefully the new judges will do their job.The sole purpose of the 95-10 initiative is to give cover to pro-abortion canidates. The initiative does absolutley NOTHING to stop aboortion.
She avidly supports the slaughter of 1.2 million children a year. Case closed.Yes indeed, she has maken her views clear over the years through her works. Besides the things I mentioned in my previous post, look at all the wickedness she is responsible for:
Yes indeed, Hillary should be wearing a pentagram around her neck rather than a cross for all of her awful works as I’m sure the honorable senators Graham, Frist and DeWine will tell you.
- Led the charge, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to expand access to health care benefits for members of the National Guard and Reserve and their families by expanding eligibility to the TRICARE system;
- Introduced legislation to provide for research comparing the effectiveness of alternative drugs, to assist seniors and other health care consumers to know which drugs are the most effective. This provision was included in the Medicare bill enacted in 2004;
- Co-sponsored legislation with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) to ensure that the US Center for Disease Control had the authority to combat Global AIDS; their bill was included in the final bill signed into law;
- She is cosponsor, with Sen. Mike DeWine (R-OH), of the Family Asthma Act of 2005 to increase attention and resources on the rapid rise in childhood asthma in children.
StMarkEofE;1580098:
Actually Planned Parenthood does not support this Initiative because it bans the partial-birth abortion and requires parental notificatioin.If this gets out she will have a lot to answer for from the feminists and NOW people. This could hurt her.
Bush and most Republicans advocate the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis women and children. Advocate leaving millions of American children with out health insurance for the sake of the minority of the wealthy.She avidly supports the slaughter of 1.2 million children a year. Case closed.
You have to pick the lessor of two evils.Bush and most Republicans advocate the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis women and children. Advocate leaving millions of American children with out health insurance for the sake of the minority of the wealthy.
Bush advocates abortion in some cases so he is not entirely pro-life. Even said birth-control is OK.
So I guess neither parties are really pro-life.