Hillary Wears A Cross

  • Thread starter Thread starter StMarkEofE
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
**General Reminder:

**The charity level of this discussion appears to be deteriorating. Please self-edit for tone and content before clicking the “Submit” button. If the charity level does not improve, this thread will have to be locked. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation
 
Why on earth does anyone even care if she wears a cross? Surely they’re common enough as an item of jewellery, even among those without a religious persuasion.

If she wore a crescent moon now THAT would be news.
Well, actually she did something close to that when she donned a Star of David to win the Jewish vote in NY. Need I say more?
 
She is signing on to the 95-10 Initiative. This is a bill sponsored by Pro-Life Democrat Ben Nelson (NE).
The sole purpose of the 95-10 initiative is to give cover to pro-abortion canidates. The initiative does absolutley NOTHING to stop aboortion.
 
I seem to remember Jesus saying something about splinters and planks of wood. I’d leave it up to God to decide if He’s being mocked.

Mike
Maybe, but we voters have to judge if she is reliable and truly on our side. She’s definitely not on the side of life, which is a major voting issue, so for her to pretend a faith she doesn’t actually believe in is nothing more than fraud and a bid to win votes, as she did when she wore a Star of David to win Jewish votes.
 
If this gets out she will have a lot to answer for from the feminists and NOW people. This could hurt her./quote

Pro-aborts , feminists and NOW love 95-10. They know that it does nothing to limit abportion but provides a fig leaf for pro-abortion politicans to claim they support life.
 
Oh, that doesn’t apply to Hillary Clinton around here :rolleyes: The same people who moan (erroneously) that people blame everything on President Bush are more than happy to say anything and everything unpleasant about Hillary Clinton. The same people who get so bothered because BA’s uniform doesn’t allow a cross, then go on and criticise other people for wearing one.

Mike
For once I agree with Mike. I detest Hillary’s politics but she has as much right to wear a cross as anyone. I do not believe she is evil incarnate. Misguided, self centered, judgemental, wrong headed and egotistical yes but not evil. Just my opinion of her. I hope some of the anti-Bush people are willing to admit the same of him.
 
She has stuck by her husband despite all that he did to her. She’s a better example of how marriage is supposed to work than most.Mike
That’s a very good point. Something to ponder…
 
Wearing a cross has no meaning for me. Whether Stalin or Hillary wears a cross makes no difference. Her inclusion in “Bible Studies” also is meaningless. How many have perpetuated a life of piety, when they were truly wicked people? Judge her? What a waste of time. She has made her views clear over the years.

A cross does not a Christian make. Nor a bible either. A Christian shall be known by their works.
Yes indeed, she has maken her views clear over the years through her works. Besides the things I mentioned in my previous post, look at all the wickedness she is responsible for:
  • Led the charge, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to expand access to health care benefits for members of the National Guard and Reserve and their families by expanding eligibility to the TRICARE system;
  • Introduced legislation to provide for research comparing the effectiveness of alternative drugs, to assist seniors and other health care consumers to know which drugs are the most effective. This provision was included in the Medicare bill enacted in 2004;
  • Co-sponsored legislation with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) to ensure that the US Center for Disease Control had the authority to combat Global AIDS; their bill was included in the final bill signed into law;
  • She is cosponsor, with Sen. Mike DeWine (R-OH), of the Family Asthma Act of 2005 to increase attention and resources on the rapid rise in childhood asthma in children.
Yes indeed, Hillary should be wearing a pentagram around her neck rather than a cross for all of her awful works as I’m sure the honorable senators Graham, Frist and DeWine will tell you.
 
Well, actually she did something close to that when she donned a Star of David to win the Jewish vote in NY. Need I say more?
😃 Well I have a star of David pendant which I haven’t worn yet because I am unsure if I really want to but I have looked it up and it is a more modern symbol today, but the new Jerusalem is heaven so I don’t worry about it much the star I mean. At my work there are many people now that are WEARING the rosary around their neck, this is more interesting than Hill. It is quite an introduction to ask them if they are catholic and of course they are pretty the rosarys I mean,I have one made out of Olive branch quite plain but I love it. I think Bill Clinton wanted to have more children but Hill had the one and she said she getting it over with but then maybe that was an attitude she got from someone?

Are they catholic or what? She reminds me of my manager :eek:

May the peace of Our God be with you! Desert
 
For once I agree with Mike. I detest Hillary’s politics but she has as much right to wear a cross as anyone. I do not believe she is evil incarnate. Misguided, self centered, judgemental, wrong headed and egotistical yes but not evil. Just my opinion of her. I hope some of the anti-Bush people are willing to admit the same of him.
I agree. She’s done some good things as a US Senator, but she is definitely an abortion-on-demand politician, which is the criteria I find most compelling when voting for a national candidate in a bid for the presidency.
 
I agree. She’s done some good things as a US Senator, but she is definitely an abortion-on-demand politician, which is the criteria I find most compelling when voting for a national candidate in a bid for the presidency.
Are you saying that you support abortion?
 
The sole purpose of the 95-10 initiative is to give cover to pro-abortion canidates. The initiative does absolutley NOTHING to stop aboortion.
Only the States and the Courts can stop it. Hopefully the new judges will do their job.

They at least want to curb the reasons many women feel it is necessary for abortions. I do not see the Republicans doing that. seem to leave the single mother living in poverty in the cold.
 
Yes indeed, she has maken her views clear over the years through her works. Besides the things I mentioned in my previous post, look at all the wickedness she is responsible for:
  • Led the charge, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) to expand access to health care benefits for members of the National Guard and Reserve and their families by expanding eligibility to the TRICARE system;
  • Introduced legislation to provide for research comparing the effectiveness of alternative drugs, to assist seniors and other health care consumers to know which drugs are the most effective. This provision was included in the Medicare bill enacted in 2004;
  • Co-sponsored legislation with Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) to ensure that the US Center for Disease Control had the authority to combat Global AIDS; their bill was included in the final bill signed into law;
  • She is cosponsor, with Sen. Mike DeWine (R-OH), of the Family Asthma Act of 2005 to increase attention and resources on the rapid rise in childhood asthma in children.
Yes indeed, Hillary should be wearing a pentagram around her neck rather than a cross for all of her awful works as I’m sure the honorable senators Graham, Frist and DeWine will tell you.
She avidly supports the slaughter of 1.2 million children a year. Case closed.
 
StMarkEofE;1580098:
If this gets out she will have a lot to answer for from the feminists and NOW people. This could hurt her.
Actually Planned Parenthood does not support this Initiative because it bans the partial-birth abortion and requires parental notificatioin.
 
She avidly supports the slaughter of 1.2 million children a year. Case closed.
Bush and most Republicans advocate the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis women and children. Advocate leaving millions of American children with out health insurance for the sake of the minority of the wealthy.

Bush advocates abortion in some cases so he is not entirely pro-life. Even said birth-control is OK.

So I guess neither parties are really pro-life.
 
Bush and most Republicans advocate the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis women and children. Advocate leaving millions of American children with out health insurance for the sake of the minority of the wealthy.

Bush advocates abortion in some cases so he is not entirely pro-life. Even said birth-control is OK.

So I guess neither parties are really pro-life.
You have to pick the lessor of two evils.

In my opinon the lessor of two evils is the one that doesn’t support the culture of death.

Be a Catholic voter and not a Dem or Rep. Honestly, as a Canadian I can’t understand why you Americans always have to pick a side even if both are wrong. Right vs Left debates are just stupid.

For example, Normally I would vote for the party that supports the poor. But in canada that party fuly supports the culture of death.
 
I can understand people’s skepticism. She is married to a man who seemed a master at PR, so it is natural to wonder if she is being sincere.

Still, I will extend to her the benefit of the doubt and try not to be judgemental. I don’t like her politics. But I don’t know what is in her heart. Perhaps she is a very flawed Christian(she is not that different from me in this regard) or is on her way to becoming a Christian.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top