Hindus Worship at Fatima Altar

  • Thread starter Thread starter DominvsVobiscvm
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
JoaoMachado:
Are you kidding, I can barely prove my own existence! 😃

Two things, one I am Portugese, and I can assure you nothing like that is going on! Second, contact Father Fox through his web site,
fatimafamily.org he is THE MAN…

Joao
Amen! Father Fox is the Man.
 
40.png
DominvsVobiscvm:
Yes, it’s private revelation, declared by the Church to be ā€œworthy of belief,ā€ but not required. To say so otherwise is heresy; in fact, it’s a form of Modernism.
I know I said I wouldn’t post anymore messages on this thread, but I had to make one thing clear, I am not a heretic. I understand that the message revealed to Sr. Lucia was a private revelation and yes it is not necessary for the salvation of one’s soul to believe this revelation. My point was that this private revelation was also accompanied by a very public exclamation point. That is the Miracle of the Sun. Which was sort of like God throwing a ā€œbrickā€ at us to say pay attention to what your Mother is saying.
 
40.png
EUSTACHIUS:
I know I said I wouldn’t post anymore messages on this thread, but I had to make one thing clear, I am not a heretic. I understand that the message revealed to Sr. Lucia was a private revelation and yes it is not necessary for the salvation of one’s soul to believe this revelation. My point was that this private revelation was also accompanied by a very public exclamation point. That is the Miracle of the Sun. Which was sort of like God throwing a ā€œbrickā€ at us to say pay attention to what your Mother is saying.
One of the first things any good mother and especially Our Mother ask’s of her children is obeidience. Think about it.
 
Can anyone find me where Father Fox has said that the events specifically mentioned in the article I quoted didn’t happen (i.e. Hindu worship at Fatima)?
 
40.png
srkbdk:
This sounds better can you please give the date and time of the program as I do not get it here and need to request info like this.

thanks:bowdown:
I think it was on May 5th (Wed. Evening Show) but if you contact EWTN they will give you all the info. I think you can even purchase a video of the program
 
40.png
EUSTACHIUS:
The First Commandment:
I am the Lord thy God. Thou shalt not have strange gods before Me. Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing to adore it.

This is sacrilege! Fr. Gruner has been warning about this for months, yet no one wants to listen. www.fatima.org

Everyone if you haven’t should perform that Communion of Reparations, the first five saturday devotion, as Our Lady of Fatima request. Make reparation for all the blasphemies committed against the Immaculate Heart of Mary and pray that the the Holy Father and all the Bishop will finally obey our Mother and properly consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart.

Immaculate Heart of Mary prayer for us now and at the hour of our death!
you’ve been paying to much attention to Fr. Gruner and not enough to the Pope.
 
Domini Canis:
Sorry, Marie; I’m just used to calling another Mary that I talk to online ā€œMareā€. šŸ™‚

The entire thing? I’m sure that not everything he say’s is smoke and mirrors…What reason do you believe he has to lie?

Miguel.
Its called ATTENTION, Look at ME, I know more than the POPE
 
Domini Canis:
Devil’s agent? Take care that your zeal against this priest doesn’t turn into slander.

It’s my understanding that Fr. Gruner doesn’t claim that Sr. Lucia is mistaken (and even if he did, how would that make him the ā€œdevil’s agentā€? After all, receivers of private revelations can be mistaken, can’t they?), rather he claims that false interviews and statements attributed to her have circulated.

Sr. Lucia is a brave one in standing up to those who threatened her with death if she would not tell the message our Lady gave. But she has not been permitted to speak publicly on this matter without the permission of our Holy Father or Cardinal Ratzinger since the 60’s. And the so called interviews and statements circulating about have been found to be dubious in origin or false.

Sr. Lucy, of her own free will, chose to become a Contemplative Nun and she lives by those rules.

Miguel.
 
Domini Canis:
Mare said,

That’s unfortunate. I pray that Fr. Gruner’s situation with the Church gets corrected; but my original point still stands: that this priest was never disciplined for anything he has said regarding the Fatima message. Rather, it was his refusal to go back to his diocese when he was ordered to.

The issue here is that Fatima is undergoing an ecumenical venture (like the building of the new shrine) and allowing certain Hindus to pray to their false gods within one of the church’s holy shrines dedicated to our Lady. So forgive me and others for feeling a little bit concerned and apprehensive about this.

For the sake of the argument; if Fatima indeed does go down this road where pagans and inter-faith practices are to be held there, how many of you would agree or defend it?

Miguel.
For the sake of the argument, if the new shrine does not allow all you claim it will, does that mean you will become a faithfull follower of the Church and the Pope and stop listening to Gruner??? Time will tell !!!
To take a little of the truth and twist it to suit your own purpose is old trick and has led many away from the REAL truth.
 
I just read the attached article on Spiritdaily.com

spiritdaily.com/fatimacontroversy2.htm

It seems that with all the bickering back and forth about which priest is faithful to Rome no one answered the basic question. Here is more evidence that the unforgivable has indeed happened. How could the church let this holy site bee desecrated?
 
Bud Stewart:
I just read the attached article on Spiritdaily.com

spiritdaily.com/fatimacontroversy2.htm

It seems that with all the bickering back and forth about which priest is faithful to Rome no one answered the basic question. Here is more evidence that the unforgivable has indeed happened. How could the church let this holy site bee desecrated?
Bud, don’t get caught up in this, it is not real! Think about it for a second, wouldn’t the most Conservative Catholic media outlets in the world be on this like stick on (you know what)? Why doesn’t that article have any pictures? They are being very descriptive, they speak of video that proves what they say, but yet there is nothing?

This is a deception, in trying to divide the Church, we are under attack from all sides and even inside.

Joao
 
Bud Stewart:
I just read the attached article on Spiritdaily.com

spiritdaily.com/fatimacontroversy2.htm

It seems that with all the bickering back and forth about which priest is faithful to Rome no one answered the basic question. Here is more evidence that the unforgivable has indeed happened. How could the church let this holy site bee desecrated?
Thats like reading the National Enquirer to see what the Pope is up to…think about it.
 
40.png
JoaoMachado:
Bud, don’t get caught up in this, it is not real! Think about it for a second, wouldn’t the most Conservative Catholic media outlets in the world be on this like stick on (you know what)? Why doesn’t that article have any pictures? They are being very descriptive, they speak of video that proves what they say, but yet there is nothing?

This is a deception, in trying to divide the Church, we are under attack from all sides and even inside.

Joao
This is such a travesty of truth Bud. As Joao said; Don’t fall for it. The devil has been trying to destroy Fatima since the beginning. He uses those who’s minds are easily lead to scandal.

No orthodox news service has carried this. Only fringe groups. The Grunerits of conspiracy are always putting this kind of stuff out. They have no proof but that does not stop them. The agents of evil never tell truth. Check your source material before you jump to conclusions. The source is not a good one.
 
Thanks, I feel much better. Sorry if I sounded upset. I’m going to take your encouraging words as the definitive answer and I am just going to let it drop.

You’ll find me on the other threads.

:o
 
Actually, this story was posted be several orthodox Catholic sources, Mark Shea and Michael Rose’s blogs among them.

I haven’t seen a single source come out to discredit it.

I have every reason to believe its real.

How the Church could allow it is beyond me . . .
 
The Church isn’t allowing it.
Just because something is posted somewhere does not make it true.: Mark Shea is not infallible ( but close).

.
 
Then where is the chorus of orthodox Catholics refuting the article’s events? I don’t see Father Fox denying it, either.
 
I can’t believ how much fun it is to read this thread! I really needed a good laugh or two.
Fr. Gruener has been suspended for not returning to his diocese; if I recall, wasn’t that diocese in Italy? And he fears deportation from there if he returns? Well, the Church would not punish him for obediently returning; were he deported (whcih is not a Church issue), would he not be incardinated in another diocese, assuming he would be obedient? Are we all saying the Church does not have that much mercy on the repentant? So then, why does he not return?
Couldn’t be that he’s a bit stiff-necked, like our Elder Brothers were accused of in the desert?
And the Church hasn’t sanctioned him officially for what he says. I’ll grant that, for the sake of the argument. So, that implies that he has not said anything sanctionable? Oh please!
And we wonder why our Protestant bretheren accuse us of idolatry. If some (I said some, not all) of the people who get so wound up about this topic spent half the time reading Scripture, that they spend on this topic of the consecration of Russia and the third secret, they just might be better off; and we with them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top