L
LaMBS
Guest
If the western societies based on Judeo-Christian principals had not developed to the point they did through the interaction of God with His creation there would have been no Nuremburg, hence this is a moot point. The actions of God occur under His infinite wisdom; the actions of men under are undertaken through varying degrees of ignorance. Man does not know the purpose for which God created another being and it is not for man to know the time of his own or anyone else’s departure from this mortal coil. Someone whose view of death is annihilation cannot understand that physical death is sometimes a better option than earthly life. The death of one person in the state of mortal sin is a worse fate than the death of any number of truly innocent people when viewed from the eternal perspective.I have to admit…that is one of the most inventive excuses for the slaughter of children I have ever heard. How do you think that god would have fared at Nuremberg?
The trials at Nuremburg were to judge whether the men who took the lives of other men were justified in so doing. No man has sufficient understanding of God’s purpose for other individuals or the immortal state of others to determine whether it is the proper time for them to move on to the next phase of their eternal lives. God does have this knowledge and He alone has the right to determine when each of us should die our physical death. I won’t go into the trials at Nuremburg much further because they were largely a debate between the Judeo-Christian creationist view of man and the Darwinist atheistic view of evolution solely through natural selection; which I understand is a taboo topic on this site.
At any rate, to evaluate God’s actions through the sensibilities at Nuremburg is merely a shift in judging God’s actions throughout salvation history from today to the late 1940s. We are not qualified to judge God’s actions; we must try to interpret the message He intends to convey through them. Those actions occurred at a particular time to influence what was happening at that time.
This is not a relativistic argument for God’s morality. God has perfect knowledge of each person’s purpose and immortal state; He has perfect knowledge of His plan for His entire creation and He has a right to do as He pleases with His creation. His will and His actions can only be the absolute best for all of His creation otherwise He would not be the omnipotent God He is. Holy Scripture is a message to guide us into complete union with God. We do not read it to judge whether He was right in what He did – we accept that He was right and we try to understand what He needs us to understand from the actions He took at the time He took them. We do not say, “Well God killed the first-born of the Egyptians so it must be right to kill first-borns.” We do not even suggest that it must have been right for anyone to kill first-borns at that time but now it’s not. We rather say that God created the first-borns that were killed during the Passover for that purpose, He knows why He did it, He had the right to do it and He knows their fate. We do not understand all of the eternal implications of it; t is not something we would ever have the right to do, it is not something we can ever completely understand this side of eternity but there is something we need to learn from it.