I can't believe you all are not LDS(Mormon)!

  • Thread starter Thread starter lizs1988
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The questions you are now asking are questions that have been asked many times before, so I have got ready-made answers for them. The archaeology question has been dealt with in this article, and the DNA question has been dealt with in this article in my Blog.
So as to contrast Christianity (and for that matter rabbinic Judaism): DNA studies collected from Kohenim (the Jewish priests, note: NOT rabbis) shows that they descend from a common male around 3,000 years before present, around the time history posits Aarom, which both OT and Tanakh identify as the ancestor of the Kohenim (the real Aaronic priesthood (Consult Hebrews) not Smith’s inventtion).

For archeology, you only need to compare the scores of magazines, journals and programs on archeology and history of the Bible, with real places, and NOTHING on the BoM side except the legend of Quetzelcoatl.
That relates to the LDS doctrine of the Apostasy, which is another frequently asked question that I have dealt with in this article in my Blog.
Yes, the Church that Christ said Hell would not prevail and He would remain "all of the days’ until the end of the world fell apart before the Apostles died off, an extreme view even for Protestants (which, let’s be clear, Mormons are not, having even gone beyond Protestantism).
How many men did you expect Him to reveal it to? Every dispensation of the gospel has been revealed initially to one man, and then spread from him to many others. Moses was one man. Abraham was one man. Noah was one man. Jesus was one man. How many men did you expect God to reveal the last dispensation through?
The BoM has the “Testimony” of the 3 Witnesses and the 8 Witnesses. It doesn’t tell you that all but 3 were later excommunicated by Joe Smith, and evidently recanted. The 3 that stayed? JS’s father and his two brothers.
The Protestants are in a worst state than the Catholics. I don’t have any sympathies for the Protestants. They are an extension of the same Apostasy; and with their “Reformation” they made things worse rather than better.
That’s your roots you are talking about. From your fruits ye shall known them, and you don’t speak well for Protestantism.
Mormon theology is biblical.
Then argue from the Bible.
It is neither Protestant nor Catholic,
Truer words were never spoken.
but biblical.
Falser words were never spoken. Prove it, from the Bible, then.
It may be different to what Catholicism or Protestantism teaches; but it is not different to what the Bible teaches; and that is what matters.
/COLOR]
And that’s were you fall.
 
Now you are completely distorting what I had said. If you can’t do better than that, then our converstaion comes to an end.

zerinus
Don’t quote my words back to me, especially when I’ve told you to read them to find the Truth.

yeah, mormon:p
 
Now you are completely distorting what I had said. If you can’t do better than that, then our converstaion comes to an end.

zerinus
I quoted directly from your blog . What is it I distorted?
 
Wow, I like this waaaaaay more than the “What Mormons Believe” cartoon! Check this out:

Christian man deflates the lies of Mormon missionaries outside of a Burger King
That was quite interesting… and it led me to this link… and I would like to know from zerinus or any other Mormon…is this an accurate portrayal of Mormon beliefs in any way?

youtube.com/watch?v=zy0d1HbItOo&feature=related

I am asking this in all sincerity…as I did not know this and merely want to know the truth. There is no baiting or dishonesty in my asking. Thanks. Peace!
 
That was quite interesting… and it led me to this link… and I would like to know from zerinus or any other Mormon…is this an accurate portrayal of Mormon beliefs in any way?

youtube.com/watch?v=zy0d1HbItOo&feature=related

I am asking this in all sincerity…as I did not know this and merely want to know the truth. There is no baiting or dishonesty in my asking. Thanks. Peace!
Come on Zerinus. Inquiring minds want to know.:eek:
 
When my friend became Mormon I did meet her church friends, attend church with her and learn about some Mormon beliefs just to understand where she was coming from, but I didn’t see anything that was true. It seemed like a bunch of mostly nice people who are very mislead. I feel sorry for them and for all they are missing out on. The whole idea that Jesus would establish a church and then just have it fall apart for all those years until Joseph Smith came along is so incredibly ridiculous to me. I do
love my Mormon friends and pray for their conversion!
 
That was quite interesting… and it led me to this link… and I would like to know from zerinus or any other Mormon…is this an accurate portrayal of Mormon beliefs in any way?

youtube.com/watch?v=kPEjWxxxon4

I am asking this in all sincerity…as I did not know this and merely want to know the truth. There is no baiting or dishonesty in my asking. Thanks. Peace!
Unfortunately I could not hear it. But I would have to say that it was quite a coincidence that two mormon missionaries were passing by on bike when this guy began his youtube presentation. It seems like a setup. Until I hear it, I will remain sceptical that these two young guys are mormons at all. Anyone can make up a nametag and wear it.
 
Unfortunately I could not hear it. But I would have to say that it was quite a coincidence that two mormon missionaries were passing by on bike when this guy began his youtube presentation. It seems like a setup. Until I hear it, I will remain sceptical that these two young guys are mormons at all. Anyone can make up a nametag and wear it.
Hearing this from you a lot lately. IIRR we heard the same thing about the kerfuffle over the missionaries in Bulgaria. As usual the response was LDS don’t act like that, they must be posers. It was also where LDS ran first over the missionary vandalism episode, until it was acknowledged by the church.
 
I was at a church meeting last night. I got a new calling! I will back read and respond.

That cartoon video is silly and is spreading false lies! I promise to write back there is just a lot to catch up on thank you!
 
lizs1988,

In regards to your parent’s admonish not to read any books outside of your church, I have to wonder on the consistency of visiting a catholic forum. It will be piecemeal, but you’ll find yourself reading selections from the Catechism of the Catholic Church and various other Catholic documents.

That said, I will try to explain why I choose Catholicism over LDS. I’ve read a number of the debates out there, so I know already that zerinus and why me have already offered their rebuttals aplenty to what I’m going to say, so I know what I’m going to pose is certainly not going to convince anyone to change their positions.

I’m going to start with the Nicene Creed.

I believe in one God, the Father Almighty, creator of Heaven and Earth, of all that is seen or unseen.

This already is a big statement. The Catholic Church believes in one God, one prime mover, one creator of all that is. He is eternal, unchanging, perfect, all-powerful. Without Him, nothing came to be; He created all there is apart from Himself. All matter and all spirit are contingent on Him.

I believe in this firmly for a number of reasons. I believe very strongly in the uncaused cause argument. I cannot accept an infinite past. The logical implications lead to absurdities (simply, if you have an infinite past, you have no beginning; if you have no beginning, you cannot reach the present.) And I cannot accept an infinite regression of deities. Or rather, I veiw an infinite regression of contingent beings a contingent construct itself, still in need of a necessary being to explain itself existence. And I believe that a necessary being must have the properties of eternal, unchanging, acting, and infinitely powerful. He has to be eternal, because otherwise he is not necessary. He has to be unchanging, because otherwise He could become something not identical with necessity. As a corollary, He is also perfect, because perfect implies no need to change. As a second corollary, He must be spirit, because matter is by nature divisible, changeable. He is acting, otherwise He could not cause other things to be. And He must be infinitely powerful so that He can create.

The gods of the Mormon creed are none of these things, thus I cannot accept them. That doesn’t make me right, but as I said before, this is just an explanation of why I believe the Catholic Church, and not the LDS.

I believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, True God from True God. One in being with the Father, through Him all things were made.

As Catholics, we believe that Jesus Christ is God. As we believe in only one God, this means that Jesus Christ is one with the Father. How is this? A mystery of unity. In the Trinity we believe in three Persons with one nature.

The generation of the Son from the Father is not a matter of creation, for the Son is not separate from the Father. He is subordinate to the Father in procession, since the Son is eternally begotten by the Father. They each have their own will, but they act in accord. They are distinct persons, but the same in nature. Again, how can this be? The eternal generation of the Son is as the Word of God, the perfect thought of God, God beholding God. This is by no means an easy concept to work with. The Mormon belief is by far easier to understand and doesn’t have the apparent contradictions that a surface look at the Trinity has, but nevertheless I accept the Trinity.

I believe Jesus must be both God and man. He must be man so that his sacrifice on Calvary is efficacious. He must be God to bridge the infinite gap between man and god.

I believe in one God. The singularity of God is, to me, the only logically tenable choice. This goes back to the nature of the necessary being I mentioned before.

I believe Jesus is different from the Father. This comes mainly from His words in the Bible.

In order for Jesus to be God, for Jesus to be different from the Father, and for there to be one God, I have to accept the Trinity.
  • For us men and for our salvation, He came down from Heaven. By the power of the Holy Spirit, he was born of the Virgin Mary, and became man. He was crucified under Pontius Pilate, suffered, died and was buried. On the third day He rose again from the dead, in fulfillment of the scriptures. He ascended into Heaven, and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and His kingdom will have no end.*
I don’t know that there is necessarily anything horribly opposing between Catholic and Mormon thought here. We both believe that Jesus came to save us. We both believe that he was born of the Virgin Mary (though we differ on how Jesus was conceived–Father versus Holy Spirit–and how virginity is defined), and we both believe he was crucified and raised from the dead. I think we both believe in the second coming of Christ at the time of judgment.

But I will speak some more on Christ’s sacrifice. I’m not sure how Mormons view original sin or how salvation actually works. In the Catholic Church, while every man is a special creation of God, his soul made from nothing at the moment of conception, nevertheless it was Adam and Eve that were tested, with the results to apply to all generations on. They were created full of grace, as perfect humans. Their sin against God emptied their souls of grace, and this choosing the material over God made them incapable of receiving grace. They passed this fallen nature on to all their descendants, so that they are born in a state lacking of grace. We call this original sin. Because of Jesus’ sacrifice, bridging the infinite gap between man and God, he restored to us the ability to be filled with grace. Through baptism, our souls become capable of receiving grace, and through the other sacraments we cultivate that grace, or recover the grace we lost when we stumble. We have the ability to become righteous (as opposed to Protestant thought, in which we don’t actually become righteous, but are judged righteous because Jesus suffers in our place) in the eyes of God.

I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son. With the Father and the Son He is worshiped and glorified. He has spoken through the prophets.

Just as the Son of God is God’s perfect word, God beholding God, eternally generated from God the Father, so the Holy Spirit is the perfect love of God, proceeding from Father and Son. And because the Holy Spirit is the perfect love of God, He is also a person, and also God. He is subordinate to the Father and Son in order of procession, but equal in nature, fully God in and of Himself.

At times I still struggle with: why a Trinity? Why only three? Why as many as three? I think the answer is simply that, when we are talking about perfect and all-powerful, then self, the image of self, and the love of self are all there are and all there can be.

(continued in next post…)
 
(…continued from last post.)

(If all this talk about the Trinity seems really bizarre and esoteric, I would recommend giving Frank Sheed’s Theology and Sanity a try. I’m not suggesting this as any means of conversion, but because he’s a lot clearer than I am about the Trinity, and as far as I can tell, he does the best job of explaining something the church fathers have attempted to explain since the time of Christ.)

I believe in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.

This is an important, completely internalized reason I don’t accept the Mormon faith. I believe Jesus set up one Church. This isn’t because of anything the Bible says or anything I’ve read from Catholic teachings. It just doesn’t make sense to me that Jesus would set up a church in the Middle East and a church in the Americas, neither with a means of communicating with each other. While I can see that it wouldn’t necessarily matter if Jesus foresaw that both churches would fail and need to be restored later on, I can’t accept that Jesus, who promised to be with us always and send us the Holy Spirit to guide us, would build a church that didn’t last. That said, assuming both churches had survived in tact, I can’t see how the existence of two separate hierarchies and the conflicts that would ensue from that would be better than starting in one location and letting it spread with one, consistent voice. Again, this isn’t by any means to convince you, and I think zerinus would comment that my internal reasons here are based entirely on my Catholic bias. I won’t disagree.

I acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins. I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come.

I’m not as fully versed in Mormon notions of the afterlife as I should be, but this is how I view it. We humans were created to be an amalgamation of spirit and matter (keep in mind, Catholics claim that the spirit and matter are different, the former indivisible, eternal, and not occupying time or space, while the latter is divisible, finite, bound within time and space). When we die, we enter an unnatural state, our spirit divided from the flesh, as it was never meant to be. While we may go to Heaven, even there we’re not complete. In the end times, our bodies will be resurrected, and our true human nature restored. Those who are in a state of grace will have glorified bodies and life forever with God; those who are not will have bodies that will endure the endless torment of Hell, having chosen willingly to be separated from God.

In what I am going to say next, I will admit I’m not necessarily working with a full knowledge of the Mormon religion, and also that the conclusion I draw here come from a long sequence of beliefs that are already strongly Catholic. But if I’m correct, the LDS church states that God the Father and His heavenly life give birth to us as spirit children, and then, in the process towards salvation and maybe even exaltation, we have to be born, live, and die. I don’t trust this process. Why, if we already exist as spirit children, would the process of being born again as a being that will die and return to the spirit realm be necessary?

Before you become too outraged at this question–my questioning of God’s plan–you must understand that I had this very same complaint with what I thought the Catholic Church taught. See, when I was little, I was never taught much about the resurrection. I kind of knew about it in a peripheral sense, but it seemed all the focus was on: you live, you die, you ultimately either go to Heaven or Hell. It seemed this whole finite, material existence meant nothing. And if it meant nothing, then God was playing a cruel trick by forcing us to endure this life. (Did I mention I was a very angsty teenager?) The discovery that we are meant to be, and have always been meant to be, a union of spirit flesh, and that we will ultimately be restored to the flesh after death, was a revelation.

In closing, I guess the best thing I can say to you to help you understand why we don’t all just automatically embrace the Mormon faith is this. We are working with completely different paradigms, making completely different assumptions to work with. The Catholics believe in an eternal God who created everything else ex nihilo. Mormons believe that matter is eternal, and there is an eternal progression of gods, though we only worship the god who shaped this universe. This is one very basic point that greatly divides us, and perhaps one of the most important. (Just as one of the most important dividing points between Catholics and Protestants is the notion of becoming righteous versus imputing the righteousness of Jesus to us.)

I will admit there are lot things about the LDS faith that are pleasingly internally consistent. I don’t particularly care to argue about Joseph Smith. Like him or hate him, God still works in mysterious ways. I don’t particularly want to argue about the historical accuracy of the Book of Mormon. I don’t know enough to make any stand there. But what keeps me from becoming Mormon is that I cannot accept a god that is not eternally god, who did not create but merely shaped. I don’t know how this goes for other Catholics, but that is how it goes for me.

I hope this is an honest, open, and earnest answer to your original question. I hope if I have acted in any way with error or a lack of consideration for you that you will point out my errors so I can correct them. I also feel I should apologize for the curt, flippant, and often rude tones you’ve received. I hope this hasn’t discouraged you from finding out more about the Catholic faith.

And don’t be afraid to read our books! You won’t know how to defend against our charges unless you know where we’re coming from.
 
I can see I will not change your minds and you all pretty much hate me so I will leave. I am not a troll and I am LDS. It is fine if you don’t think so. I was just planting seeds. I’m sorry if I offended you.

Bye
 
I can see I will not change your minds and you all pretty much hate me so I will leave. I am not a troll and I am LDS. It is fine if you don’t think so. I was just planting seeds. I’m sorry if I offended you.

Bye
Wow, only took nine pages of pointless rambling for her faith to be shaken.
 
I can see I will not change your minds and you all pretty much hate me so I will leave. I am not a troll and I am LDS. It is fine if you don’t think so. I was just planting seeds. I’m sorry if I offended you.

Bye
Interesting thread. Lots of substance to the argument against the LDS faith. Very little in support of what you believe to be the one true church. Instead of accusing us of “hating” you and going away, why don’t you take the time to refute some of the things people have posted. I’d like to hear a cogent defense of the LDS faith, but most of the time all I hear is "just read the BoM and you will “feel” it to be the truth. Not much of an argument in support of an allegedly restored religion. Should there not also be a reaonsable presentation of the restored Mormon belief system and a justification for the “Great Apostacy” that necessitated that restoration?

Peace,
-Robert

P.S. I don’t hate you. But neither do I find you to be a very convincing LDS apologist. And you seem to be ill-informed of Catholic doctrine as well, given your initial post accusing Catholics of worshipping the Pope. I hope you are learning from your experiences, and come to know and follow the truth, wherever it may lead.
 
P.S. I don’t hate you. But neither do I find you to be a very convincing LDS apologist. And you seem to be ill-informed of Catholic doctrine as well, given your initial post accusing Catholics of worshipping the Pope. I hope you are learning from your experiences, and come to know and follow the truth, wherever it may lead.
Too bad she decided to leave before seeing this. :doh2:
 
Lion of Narnia:
Carione, GREAT POST!
Thanks. However, it might be too little too late. Then again, if she came in here expecting immediate conversions, then maybe a little disillusionment in that regards is necessary. I want to become more involved in apologetic work myself, and the big stumbling point every time is that I want to have a killer argument that no one can refute. The problem with that, of course, is that religious belief is very hard to uproot. Show me a thousand pieces of evidence that the Catholic Church is not the true church, and chances are I’ll still dig in my heels and insist that I’m right. Why should I expect anyone else to do otherwise? No such killer argument exists. At best, you try to make cogent arguments in hopes that someone will appreciate what you have to say, even if he doesn’t agree.

And of course, quite often the natives will be hostile, which is fairly discouraging, as well.
 
I was at a church meeting last night. I got a new calling! I will back read and respond.

That cartoon video is silly and is spreading false lies! I promise to write back there is just a lot to catch up on thank you!
What’s your new calling?

Though the cartoon covers Mormonism fairly well (not entirely so), it is I agree, not done in good faith or with respect.
 
I can see I will not change your minds and you all pretty much hate me so I will leave. I am not a troll and I am LDS. It is fine if you don’t think so. I was just planting seeds. I’m sorry if I offended you.

Bye
Stick around.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top