C
Church_Militant
Guest
My problem isn’t with the Bible translation, it’s that I disagree with your interpretation of the passage.I actually consulted several different Bible versions before posting that one b/c they all said the same thing. Do you consider these butchered as well?:
lest that be your specific problem with the wording. The angel in revelations and Peter both viewed it as such and rebuked it. Going beyond what is written is pure speculation (that God told them it was worship and so they rebuked them) and an excuse not worthy of my consideration.Oh…so all the cultures where they bow to each other are involved in worship of each other? Like I said…twisted…They all say the same thing. Bowing is an expression of adoration
If you say so. May God grant me the grace to always be the nemesis of all untruth and heresies.No offense, CM, but, IMO, you are notorious for twisting words and meanings (not just mine). I pray it is unintentional. I clearly brought vs 5 into light as to the reason it is forbidden.
However, I did not twist anything that you said and simply followed your comments out to their logical end.
Here again, this is your belief based on your own errant interpretation, and not at all on what the actual passage in question says.Not true at all. Have you never seen a church with kneelers in front of its statues? When you say “no faithful Catholic ever does” you are probably meaning that they never intent to, and that is probably true in most cases, but again, intention does not excuse error unless it is due to ignorance. But those who have considered the Scripture which clearly condemns it and continue to defend the practice cannot make such a claim of ignorance.
My parish has a kneeler right in front of the Eucharistic tabernacle. If I kneel there to pray do you consider that to be idolatry as well?
I reject your interpretation because it is plain that it is twisted and forced on to the passage, as opposed to simply accepting what the context of the passage says. This is pretty typical of a literalist interpretation instead of a literal interpretation which is what the Catholic Church takes.
Because having been deceived by people with Bibles in the past, I refuse to stand by and allow my Catholic brothers and sisters to suffer the same fate. It is also a function of the person that I am as a result of God’s active presence in my life. I am committed to the truth at all costs, regardless of where it leads.And, btw: Why do you continue to take part in apologetics discussion? You KNOW you are going to be dealing with non-Catholic thought - all of which you label: “anti-Catholic”.
The better statement would be that I “KNOW I am going to be dealing with non-Catholic -]thought/-]” error, and because I have dealt with these objections before I refute it.
Anti-Catholic propaganda is so widespread that people like you buy into it and are deceived by it all the time, even as I was. Just because you believe it doesn’t make it factually or Biblically accurate.
I don’t think you’ll find anywhere in my posts where I label you an a-C. I simply point out that your beliefs are parroting the typical a-C propaganda.I am NOT anti-Catholic simply b/c I question the Catholic church’s teachings and don’t appreciate being uncharitably labelled as such! Do you need to mis-label people to justify yourself? Does it somehow make you feel more righteous? God help you…
So consider me told…for what it’s worth. The problem is that this is fairly common with n-Cs who can’t offer a cogent and accurate response to a refutation.Derrogatory comments like these are also numerous in your posts, and I had promised myself the last time I conversed with you that I would bring it to your attention.
Suddenly I’m some kind of anti-Protestant, when in fact I’m not the one who goes to forums belonging to other faiths and errantly attacking what they believe. I’m not anti-anything but error, and I make no apology (no pun intended) for that. If you don’t want the holes punched in your arguments with facts then don’t put them out here where they can be dealt with. Just keep them safely tucked away inside you where they will be safe. But if anyone tosses out craziness around me… they can expect a refutation.
If you say so… I rather doubt that either you or the moderation staff here will agree. I know that I don’t.Your posts wreak with anti-“protestantism” & self-righteousness and lack the charity worth giving them consideration. The only reason I am responding to them is for the sake of those who do.
And Catholics would have to say that we do not care to follow error, especially ones based on non-Christian influences that date no farther back than the 9th century.I don’t care to follow error - even if it is 2000 years old. It doesn’t make it any more appealing.
Never said that any of that was so, nor have I ever asserted that this is what we Catholics do with any images.Again, prove that the images were 1) adored/“served”/bowed to, etc… and furthermore,
Completely irrelevant. All they had to do was be correct on this one issue at the time the images were made.
- prove that those who made those images were faithful in all aspects to the original faith.
By the same logic, one would eliminate every Protestant teacher because all of them have been in doctrinal error since the reformation.
Praying that the Hoy Spirit convict your heart of the errors you have fallen into and lead you home.Praying God will inspire you with a more respectful and charitable response
