If you do Not believe that Blessed Mary is the Mother of God, than who do you believe Jesus Christ is?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ComeHome2Rome
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would we want to grieve Jesus Christ our Lord, and our Heavenly Father, and the Holy Spirit by arguing over the terminology in which we describe the Virgin Mother of our Lord Jesus Christ? I am guilty as anyone in my ardor for the truth of the scriptures.

All of us do not have a devotion to the blessed Virgin Mary, so does that make us less in the eyes of God? If we are missing the mark in this way, please pray for us. I accept anyone who has a devotion to the Virgin Mary as long as they show love towards those who do not. God gives us different graces and gifts of calling, and we are not alike in our gifting. To my shame, we often fail, and this is not pleasing to God in the least. Let us hold to the convictions that God has given us, but let us also love one another in the love of our Lord Jesus Christ, who suffered so much for us in order that we might be reconciled to God and to one another. Surely it grieves the Son of God as much as it does his Mother to see us arguing this way.

In His great mercy, may God forgive us.
Hi Zarthan,

Are you really Catholic?

I have been reading your post and I have this great doubt that somehow you are not.

You keep on harping about the Pre-Nicene Fathers as though only the pre-Nicene Church had the right doctrine. As if somehow, Christ’s Church died at Nicea.:confused:

This is the line of thinking that certain variants of protestantism hold. So I think you are not being quite honest about your religion.

Also this pre-occupation with Jesus being made perfect is I think more an SDA line of thinking.

Peace!

Cory
 
Mary was the instrument (vessel) God used to enter humanity
YES…And through that human birth of Jesus Christ by HIs Mother Mary He then become fully Human and Divine.

YES…And The Blessed Virgin Mother of the Lord thus entered into history by the will of God as the Mother of the Lord/God. And that reality and truth never stopped being truth, as it was on earth, so it is in heaven.

GLAD YOU FINALLY AGREE with this…AMEN!!! 👍 👍 👍
 
YES…And through that human birth of Jesus Christ by HIs Mother Mary He then become fully Human and Divine.

YES…And The Blessed Virgin Mother of the Lord thus entered into history by the will of God as the Mother of the Lord/God. And that reality and truth never stopped being truth, as it was on earth, so it is in heaven.

GLAD YOU FINALLY AGREE with this…AMEN!!! 👍 👍 👍
:eek::confused: *Is that what Dokimas said?

Cinette*
 
:eek::confused: *Is that what Dokimas said?

Cinette*
I must be honest my sister, I have reduced myself to the level of game playing through illusive posting. Only in fun though 😃

As your previous post states, “In this case the OP has asked a very interesting question and I am one of those interested in understanding how our (separated) brothers and sisters in Christ interpret the scriptures.”

I also have been hoping to reach a clearer level of understanding from the opposed thinking on this thread.
 
Surely it grieves the Son of God as much as it does his Mother to see us arguing this way.
What you call arguing, we call dialogue or debate or discourse.

Do not the Scriptures say to Love God with our entire Mind? Are we not trying to increase our Love of God by discussing theological issues so that we can attempt to know Him with our Mind?

Is that not the purpose of posting on the CAFs?

It seems peculiar to come to the CAFs then decry the debate that ensues. That would be like going to a Cruciverbalist Forum and then saying, “There’s no need to discuss crossword puzzles! Just solve them!”
 
It is obvious that we have a different understanding of why Jesus Christ, the Son of God came to this earth. He needed to speak every word that He heard from his Father and he needed to do everything his Father showed him. He needed to be tempted in every way as we, yet without sin. He needed to take the death of our sins upon himself. “I came down from heaven not to do my will, but the will of Him who sent me”.
He learned obedience to his Father in his being tempted in every way as us, yet without sin. He learned obedience by taking up his cross and by suffering crucifixion and sheol for our sins. Thereby, he became perfect in order to be made Lord and Christ in his victorious resurrection over death. If Jesus Christ, the Son of God had not been perfectly obedient to his Father’s will on earth, he would not have obtained for us eternal salvation for all who obey him. I do not see how this is blasphemous, it is glorious and wonderful what our Saviour has done for us. Thanks be to God!

As far as what language Elizabeth spoke, no one knows whether she spoke Aramaic or Hebrew. There are several instances where Hebrew is known to have been spoken in the N.T. Elizabeth being of Aaronic lineage would have been more likely to have spoken in Hebrew. (Luke 23:38, John 5;2, 19:3, 19:17, 20: Acts 21:40, 22:2, 26:14; Rev. 9:11; 16:6)
**The perversion that you espouse about Jesus has been dealt with in *****every ***early Council of the Church. Heresies such as Gnosticism, Arianism, Nestorianism, Modalism all failed because of their abject misunderstanding of the very nature of God - just as you do.

In your attempt to separate Christ’s indivisible natures, you have concocted a bizarre Jesus - which is similar to the Christadelphian sect - whereby, he was not always perfect. You completely misunderstand his perfect sacrifice on Calvary by stating that he (GOD) was imperfect before he suffered. The very reason his sacrifice was perfect is the fact that he was GOD.

You bypass the fact that as God,
** ALL**** things were created BY him and THROUGH him (John 1:3, Col. 1:16).**

**Finally, as for which dialect Mary and Elizabeth spoke, most linguistic scholars agree that they probably spoke Aramaic. Jesus and the apostles are quoted many times in Scripture speaking Aramaic. Here are but a few examples (there are literally dozens more): **
Matt. 16:18, Mark 7:34, Mark 14:36, Mark 15:34, John 1:42, John 21:2, Luke 10:38-41. John 11:1-39, John 12:2
 
Why would we want to grieve Jesus Christ our Lord, and our Heavenly Father, and the Holy Spirit by arguing over the terminology in which we describe the Virgin Mother of our Lord Jesus Christ? I am guilty as anyone in my ardor for the truth of the scriptures.

All of us do not have a devotion to the blessed Virgin Mary, so does that make us less in the eyes of God? If we are missing the mark in this way, please pray for us. I accept anyone who has a devotion to the Virgin Mary as long as they show love towards those who do not. God gives us different graces and gifts of calling, and we are not alike in our gifting. To my shame, we often fail, and this is not pleasing to God in the least. Let us hold to the convictions that God has given us, but let us also love one another in the love of our Lord Jesus Christ, who suffered so much for us in order that we might be reconciled to God and to one another. Surely it grieves the Son of God as much as it does his Mother to see us arguing this way.

In His great mercy, may God forgive us.
WRONG.
You go beyond not having a devotion to Mary. What you are doing is stating heresy.


**Devotions to the blessed Mother are not necessary for salvation but they are very helpful to it. By one’s refusal, the person is throwing away a grerat alliance with God. However wasteful - it is not mandatory. **

BUT, by separating the two natures of Christ in an efforet to belittle Our Lady’s importance in God’s plan of salvation - you have gone far beyond a simple refusal of devotion and have instead mired yourself in a swamp of heresy.**
 
“All of us do not have a devotion to the blessed Virgin Mary”

True, but then Doctrine is not a Devotion either. Just to clarify, Doctrine is a required belief.
 
For anyone who is wondering, what I believe is between myself and my God. I search the scriptures and the pre-Nicene church fathers for the truth. Nicene formulas can never express the complexity of the theology of God the Father and the Son of God. Here are just a few scriptural complexities.

No one is required to believe that the Father is greater than the Son of God, eventhough that is what Jesus Christ said of His Father when he was on earth.

No one is required to believe that the Son of God does not know all things, eventhough Jesus Christ said no one knows the day of his return, but His Father only.

No one is required to believe that everything the Son of God ever said or did from heaven, or from earth is in obedience to the will of His Father, eventhough that is what scriptures say.

No one is required to believe that the Father gave or granted His Son to have life in himself, eventhough scripture says so.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ was born naturally through the birth canal of his mother Mary, but this is what scriptures teach.

No one is required to believe that “God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin condemned sin in the flesh, in order for the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit”, therefore his mother inherited the fallen nature of Adam and Eve also.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ was tempted in every way as us, yet without sin, but this is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that the Son learned obedience through the things which he suffered and being made perfect he became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey him, yet this is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that the Son of God became a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek, and became Lord with all authority over all things when he was raised from the death of our sins, yet this what scriptures state.

No one is required to believe that the Father begot the soul of His Son unto eternal life from the death of our sins while he was in Sheol, thus the Son became the firstborn from the dead, eventhough that is what the scriptures say.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ, the Son of God said to Mary Magdalene on the day of his resurrection, “Tell my brothers, that I am going to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God” yet that is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that “there are so-called gods in heaven and on earth, (there are to be sure, many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords’ ), yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we are from Him, and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and we are through him.”

No one is required to believe that neither man nor denomination taught me these things,
but God knows I am telling the truth.

Doctrinal formulas which try to explain these complexities fall short of the truth.
 
I must be honest my sister, I have reduced myself to the level of game playing through illusive posting. Only in fun though 😃

As your previous post states, “In this case the OP has asked a very interesting question and I am one of those interested in understanding how our (separated) brothers and sisters in Christ interpret the scriptures.”

I also have been hoping to reach a clearer level of understanding from the opposed thinking on this thread.
*Yes, but you seems to be helping Dokimas along. I really want his thinking. I want him to unravel his thoughts.
🙂
*
 
For anyone who is wondering, what I believe is between myself and my God. I search the scriptures and the pre-Nicene church fathers for the truth. Nicene formulas can never express the complexity of the theology of God the Father and the Son of God. Here are just a few scriptural complexities.

No one is required to believe that the Father is greater than the Son of God, eventhough that is what Jesus Christ said of His Father when he was on earth.

No one is required to believe that the Son of God does not know all things, eventhough Jesus Christ said no one knows the day of his return, but His Father only.

No one is required to believe that everything the Son of God ever said or did from heaven, or from earth is in obedience to the will of His Father, eventhough that is what scriptures say.

No one is required to believe that the Father gave or granted His Son to have life in himself, eventhough scripture says so.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ was born naturally through the birth canal of his mother Mary, but this is what scriptures teach.

No one is required to believe that “God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin condemned sin in the flesh, in order for the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit”, therefore his mother inherited the fallen nature of Adam and Eve also.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ was tempted in every way as us, yet without sin, but this is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that the Son learned obedience through the things which he suffered and being made perfect he became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey him, yet this is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that the Son of God became a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek, and became Lord with all authority over all things when he was raised from the death of our sins, yet this what scriptures state.

No one is required to believe that the Father begot the soul of His Son unto eternal life from the death of our sins while he was in Sheol, thus the Son became the firstborn from the dead, eventhough that is what the scriptures say.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ, the Son of God said to Mary Magdalene on the day of his resurrection, “Tell my brothers, that I am going to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God” yet that is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that “there are so-called gods in heaven and on earth, (there are to be sure, many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords’ ), yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we are from Him, and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and we are through him.”

No one is required to believe that neither man nor denomination taught me these things, but God knows I am telling the truth.

Doctrinal formulas which try to explain these complexities fall short of the truth.
No one is required to believe anything for that matter - unless they expect to be saved.

All of your posts - especially this last one illustrate one thing very clearly:**
Your refusal to obey Jesus Christ via his Church - while claiming to be part of it - shows an extreme spiritual pride.

Your ludicrous claim that the Scriptures teach that Jesus Christ was born naturally through the birth canal of his mother Mary is unfounded and indefensible as the Bible is silent about that.


**Your complete inability to understand Christ’s two natures and his relationship with the Father is painfully evident in many of your preposterous claims.

Finally - your heretical and blasphemous claim that Jesus was imperfect until he suffered is mind-bogglingly arrogant.

I can’t tell you what to do but I suggest that you stop identifying yourself as a Catholic, because you certainly are not. Some of your views are not Christian in any sense of the word.
I’ll pray for you and anybody else who has been infected with these heretical ideas you’ve espoused on this thread.
 
For anyone who is wondering, what I believe is between myself and my God. I search the scriptures and the pre-Nicene church fathers for the truth. Nicene formulas can never express the complexity of the theology of God the Father and the Son of God. Here are just a few scriptural complexities.

No one is required to believe that the Father is greater than the Son of God, eventhough that is what Jesus Christ said of His Father when he was on earth.

No one is required to believe that the Son of God does not know all things, eventhough Jesus Christ said no one knows the day of his return, but His Father only.

No one is required to believe that everything the Son of God ever said or did from heaven, or from earth is in obedience to the will of His Father, eventhough that is what scriptures say.

No one is required to believe that the Father gave or granted His Son to have life in himself, eventhough scripture says so.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ was born naturally through the birth canal of his mother Mary, but this is what scriptures teach.

No one is required to believe that “God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin condemned sin in the flesh, in order for the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit”, therefore his mother inherited the fallen nature of Adam and Eve also.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ was tempted in every way as us, yet without sin, but this is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that the Son learned obedience through the things which he suffered and being made perfect he became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey him, yet this is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that the Son of God became a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek, and became Lord with all authority over all things when he was raised from the death of our sins, yet this what scriptures state.

No one is required to believe that the Father begot the soul of His Son unto eternal life from the death of our sins while he was in Sheol, thus the Son became the firstborn from the dead, eventhough that is what the scriptures say.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ, the Son of God said to Mary Magdalene on the day of his resurrection, “Tell my brothers, that I am going to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God” yet that is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that “there are so-called gods in heaven and on earth, (there are to be sure, many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords’ ), yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we are from Him, and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and we are through him.”

No one is required to believe that neither man nor denomination taught me these things,
but God knows I am telling the truth.

Doctrinal formulas which try to explain these complexities fall short of the truth.
*Noone is required to become a Christian but if you want to belong to the Church founded by Jesus Christ then you are required to believe doctrine and stricture emanates from Tradition. I think you are complicating things. Aim for truth and, if you are a Catholic, trust in the Catholic Church which has the deposit of Faith and a history which goes back to Jesus himself.

:)*
 
What you call arguing, we call dialogue or debate or discourse.

Do not the Scriptures say to Love God with our entire Mind? Are we not trying to increase our Love of God by discussing theological issues so that we can attempt to know Him with our Mind?

Is that not the purpose of posting on the CAFs?

It seems peculiar to come to the CAFs then decry the debate that ensues. That would be like going to a Cruciverbalist Forum and then saying, “There’s no need to discuss crossword puzzles! Just solve them!”
Bravo! Excellent.

And I still think zarthan is not Catholic though his profile says he is.
 
For anyone who is wondering, what I believe is between myself and my God. I search the scriptures and the pre-Nicene church fathers for the truth. Nicene formulas can never express the complexity of the theology of God the Father and the Son of God. Here are just a few scriptural complexities.
**The question is why limit yourself to the pre-Nicene Fathers? **

**Did the Church end at the Council of Nicea?

I think you are not being honest about your religious affiliation.
**
 
For anyone who is wondering, what I believe is between myself and my God. I search the scriptures and the pre-Nicene church fathers for the truth. Nicene formulas can never express the complexity of the theology of God the Father and the Son of God.

No one is required to believe that neither man nor denomination taught me these things,
but God knows I am telling the truth.

Doctrinal formulas which try to explain these complexities fall short of the truth.
Wow, and here comes the real thinking…If those Doctrines fall short, imagine how short “your thinking” will fall?

You have come here to proudly proclaim what you “obviously” have not been taught by any CC on Earth. It appears as a Catholic you have decided to “accept” false heretical teachings as “absolute” which are arrived from other than the CC. Then you chose to close your mind and not accept any other theory by the CC, which in fact may just save your soul. Not only this, but you then chose to come to a Catholic Forum and defend heretical theory and thinking. Thats mighty Catholic of you I might add.

My friend, that becomes whats called “living in a state of denial.” You painted yourself in a corner and are now depending on the “zarthan religion.” And that foolishness stare’s in the face of 2000-years of Scholars? “Maybe just maybe, in all your wisdom your wrong. Has that thought ever crossed your mind?” The same mind that you must “open” to surpass denial. The Doctrine is arrived at by the intercession of the Holy Spirit. So that isn’t whats falling short of truth, “YOUR” Sola Scriptura theorys are whats failing miserably.

And yes my friend it is “REQUIRED BELIEF” in the Catholic Faith as far as all the Doctrines are concerned. Its obligation as written in Pius IX Bull in 1884. Which you are encouraged to google and read. Its now taught in the Catechism of the Church. And the Doctrines with the Blessed Mother become yet more complex for the fact two were spoken in ex-cathedra, the only two times in History. So we have in fact Three Doctrines which are required belief in the CC inregards to Mary, and of course this goes much deeper in regards to other doctrines and teachings.

The Immaculate Conception
The Assumption
Mary as co-redemtrix with Jesus

And at “THIS POINT” in the road your entitled to believe whatever you chose…“the Easter Bunny” if you so desire.

I realize there are some wonderful minds that come to CAF. Yet here, when 2000-years of scholars stare you in the face. Its a bit bold of one to state their thoughts as absolute, and to proclaim the CC wrong. One must graduate from denial and reach open honesty to understand, maybe, just maybe, their 4.0 gpa is a drop in the buck against 2000-years of scholars.

“The Mary Myth” and how it relates to modern women and Bible has been debated in every major university in the world. Yet in the end the opposed thinking is impressive, and it has 2000-years of scholars which agree with it. Then, when you just look as some of their educations? It becomes so overwhelming, one must quickly conclude they in fact may well be wrong. The modern thinking only promotes “comfortability” in sexual behavior and promotes womens independence. Which in many aspects isn’t wrong or a bad thing. Nonetheless, when theory goes against the grain of virginity which leads to matrimony a Sacrament of the Church. Then one must also conclude that in hind-sight of our modern society this is an error in mankind today. Man must admit we are not so great at choosing mates, and when the religious aspect is removed we fail miserably. Pure nonsense is what we really on, and it doesn’t hold water as statistics clearly show. I don’t even have to go into the corrupt thinking here, the message is clear. The implications of the attack on Mary reach far beyond Virginity and Matrimony, and extend right into sexual immoralty, abortion, pornography, and deviate sexual behavior becomes promoted, then when a human oversteps the line, we prosecute the very behavior we have encouraged.

Erasmus concluded that we as mankind ought admit we don’t have all the answers, yet hold true to church teaching non-dogmatically until God clarifys truth to man. Because the very essense of the FAMILY is whats at stake, and that family has been a documented success in CC history. He was correct.

Or should we sleepwalk to the end of the night in what we “think” might be wrong in our own mind? The thinking behind Mary is only scratched in Luke. The complications are emmense once we analyse in depth.

Take a good look at how the heretical degradation of Mary in Islam has led to the slavery of women and how women are viewed in Islam. Mohammad correlates a pregant woman as insignificant as two goats locking horns.

Look at what its done in Mormon thinking. Collect women? Is anyone collecting women in their 40’s and 50’s? Of course not why go with a 40 when you can have two-20’s?

Look at atheism, marxism, communism and right here in the materialistic thinking of democracy in the USA. What a wicked web we weave. And then rationalize it to fit Gods Universe.

One must look outside this debate to clearly see the ramifications of this debate. I see abomination at every turn. And a weak attempt by man to assume what God accually thinks and then adjust their thinking to include “ALL” mankind. So, don’t go to hell on your own, drag thousands with you? Theres a wonderful philosophy. Mine is “If you can’t help them, then don’t hurt them.” How about we go with that one on a World Wide internet Forum which Thousands read daily? These are “I” “ME” and “MYSELF” theorys presented in opposition to the CC on this thread. Which serve to promote ones own inadaquate behavior. My suggestion is you don’t drag others with you.
 
“No one is required to believe that neither man nor denomination taught me these things,
but God knows I am telling the truth.”

I cannot get over how BOLD this statement is. So in fact GOD has spoken to YOU and given you the TRUTH? You are here to communicate as a Prophet of God? So in fact God must have changed His mind about Mary since the last Seers. Who BTW would be in direct contrast with your thinking? So who’s right YOU or the Seers at Fatima? Which BTW God performed a Miracle to valididate the message. Is this really the claim you would like to go with a world wide internet, public forum??? Is this NOT what you insinuate here? God has contacted YOU?

ERICs right this has become so ABSURD now I must walk away from the computer.
 
“If you do not believe that Blessed Mary is the Mother of God, then who do you believe Jesus Christ is?”
*
*This is the question the OP asked when he started this thread and this is the question some of us are wanting to hear. It has been asked by more than one Poster and yet we never get an answer.

If certain Posters continue to have side-tracked conversations then we will never get an answer. So what is the point in participating in a thread if people ignore the subject?

I repeat: we know the Catholic answer and we are looking for the Protestant answer. I, for one, am very interested.

🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷
*
Only a Jehovah witness can answer this!! They will say Jesus is not God!! They will say Jesus was created by God. Who was {a God} who is known as his Son. They say satan is known as a God. Although he is a angel. Jesus is also known as Michael the Angel also. This is why they say mary is not the mother of God.:eek:
 
For anyone who is wondering, what I believe is between myself and my God. I search the scriptures and the pre-Nicene church fathers for the truth. Nicene formulas can never express the complexity of the theology of God the Father and the Son of God. Here are just a few scriptural complexities.

No one is required to believe that the Father is greater than the Son of God, eventhough that is what Jesus Christ said of His Father when he was on earth.

No one is required to believe that the Son of God does not know all things, eventhough Jesus Christ said no one knows the day of his return, but His Father only.

No one is required to believe that everything the Son of God ever said or did from heaven, or from earth is in obedience to the will of His Father, eventhough that is what scriptures say.

No one is required to believe that the Father gave or granted His Son to have life in himself, eventhough scripture says so.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ was born naturally through the birth canal of his mother Mary, but this is what scriptures teach.

No one is required to believe that “God sent his Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin condemned sin in the flesh, in order for the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit”, therefore his mother inherited the fallen nature of Adam and Eve also.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ was tempted in every way as us, yet without sin, but this is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that the Son learned obedience through the things which he suffered and being made perfect he became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey him, yet this is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that the Son of God became a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek, and became Lord with all authority over all things when he was raised from the death of our sins, yet this what scriptures state.

No one is required to believe that the Father begot the soul of His Son unto eternal life from the death of our sins while he was in Sheol, thus the Son became the firstborn from the dead, eventhough that is what the scriptures say.

No one is required to believe that Jesus Christ, the Son of God said to Mary Magdalene on the day of his resurrection, “Tell my brothers, that I am going to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God” yet that is what scripture says.

No one is required to believe that “there are so-called gods in heaven and on earth, (there are to be sure, many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords’ ), yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we are from Him, and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and we are through him.”

No one is required to believe that neither man nor denomination taught me these things,
but God knows I am telling the truth.

Doctrinal formulas which try to explain these complexities fall short of the truth.
Spoken like a true inventor of doctrine . . .
 
*Yes, but you seems to be helping Dokimas along. I really want his thinking. I want him to unravel his thoughts.
🙂
*
Seems you’re making an assuption or a judgment. I can assure you I’ve thought on things for a long time. I have no doubt that some of my understandings fall short of perfection. I can assure you my thoughts, while may be partly incorrect, are not ravelled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top