I'm LDS....let's learn from eachother.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brother_Dorsey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
well the necronomicon certainly isn’t what is what is marketed as (secret HP lovecraft type book of satanic powers). but it was written by someone who did their research into sumerian mythology. if you want to read about what little we know of sumerian rituals that book has it.
 
well the necronomicon certainly isn’t what is what is marketed as (secret HP lovecraft type book of satanic powers). but it was written by someone who did their research into sumerian mythology. if you want to read about what little we know of sumerian rituals that book has it.
That’s sorta interesting.

I think I read Lovecraft once. If I recall correctly, it was a story about a giant worm, that was attracted to the hum of a power plant, or some such stuff. When they switched on the power plant, the worm came up through the ground and ate all the people in town. (LOL!) I was more into Thoreau and Jack London wilderness tales as a kid.

What I got from Inanna was that she went into the underworld to visit her sister (or sister-in-law, or something). The Sumerians had something like kerberos, a monster-guard, and she had to throw her clothes at it, so by the time she got to her sister’s place, she was buck naked.

Sounds a little like Demeter, only a lot less refined. That was just my take on it.

I bet you’re a big Stephen King and Joyce Carol Oates fan, aren’t you? I’ve got a lot of friends who like horror stuff.
 
not so much. King is okay. I’m more Sci-Fi/Fantasy with a little horror thrown in.
 
well the necronomicon certainly isn’t what is what is marketed as (secret HP lovecraft type book of satanic powers). but it was written by someone who did their research into sumerian mythology. if you want to read about what little we know of sumerian rituals that book has it.
🤷 All I know is, my old friends and fellow Druids who were also members of the OTO considered this book - the one written by “Simon”, not any of the other Lovecraft spoof necronomicons floating about - to be the biggest piece of trash ever written in the area of magic. And that’s saying a lot, because there’s a lot of trash out there. If this book contains authentic Sumerian rituals, there’s got to be a way to verify those rituals from a reputable source, which would hopefully present them in the correct context.

ETA: More here:
chaosmatrix.org/library/chaos/texts/simnecro.html
 
it deoends on some interpretations. 10% is a starting point. if a person is really living out the tithe it is closer to 30%. i used to belong to a protestant sect that had this all worked out from scripture. .
From what I’ve been told, by Mormons, they are expected to pay 10% of their income (a full tithe) plus fast offerings. Some people pay the 10% on net income, some pay it on gross; the determination is left to the individual. Tithing is supposed to be paid before any other expenses, in other words before rent/house payments, utilities, groceries, etc. They don’t verify this, but they are asked if they pay a full tithe during the interview to get or retain a temple recommend and must answer in the affirmative to get the TR. Not paying a full tithe does not impact memebership status; but one cannot go to the temple, even to attend weddings. All funds are sent to Salt Lake City, which in turn allocates some funds back to the stakes/wards/branches. No financial information is shared with members.

In our Parish, we are asked to give one hour’s salary or wage if our other needs so allow. Most people only put a dollar in the basket, which I think is inexcusable in most cases, but we somehow muddle along. We may have a second collection for a special charitable cause or if something major comes along (like a new A/C system is needed). Other than an allocated share of the diocesan administrative expenses, all funds remain in the Parish. A summary financial statement is published in the bulletin monthly and full financial statements are provided annually.
 
🤷 All I know is, my old friends and fellow Druids who were also members of the OTO considered this book - the one written by “Simon”, not any of the other Lovecraft spoof necronomicons floating about - to be the biggest piece of trash ever written in the area of magic. And that’s saying a lot, because there’s a lot of trash out there. If this book contains authentic Sumerian rituals, there’s got to be a way to verify those rituals from a reputable source, which would hopefully present them in the correct context.

ETA: More here:
chaosmatrix.org/library/chaos/texts/simnecro.html
well many pagans are “spell snobs” all pontificating about what is or isn’t “real” magic. the necronomicon is much like the keys of solomon or the book of abra melin the mage in that it IS a piece of fiction that was marketed as some mystic tome. it also shares with those works an origin in mythical ritual. just as the other thre books contained kabalistical “magic” that was based on old jewish myths the necronomicon alleged ancient mysteries that were really just copied sumerian rituals. they are not that impressive. (reality rarely is) and as there is no magic they don’t do anything. BUT they are in line with what little we know about sumerian worship. druids tend to the celtic mythos and the OTO types are notorious spell snobs who love to show off how knowledgeable they are about “real magic”. the necronomicon is nothing more than basic cereal offerings and ritual devotions to the various sumerian idols with instructions copied form any good anthropology text on how to construct talismans and perform basic sympathetic magic.

Bottom line is that stuff (as all paganism" is merely a pale shadow of true religion. the occult is a timewaster that keeps people occupied when they wuold otherwise be seeking God.
 
Bottom line is that stuff (as all paganism" is merely a pale shadow of true religion. the occult is a timewaster that keeps people occupied when they wuold otherwise be seeking God.
I don’t see ibkc’s posts and ordinarily don’t care too much about anything she has to say. Last week she was boasting about being in a master’s program someplace but didn’t understand terms like “cv”, so I quit wasting my time with her.

While I had a certain opinion of the person behind her posts, I am quite shocked to see that she was involved with the OTO. I didn’t have any idea that anyone here had been involved in anything that negative (and I’m glad to hear she has left that behind).

This is one form of paganism that is more than simply timewasting. I read up on it a couple of days ago, after a discussion with “Faith of Abraham” here. He alluded to this sort of thing, and it turns out he was correct.

The OTO is a group founded on the ideas of a guy named Aleister Crowley. Some of the rituals he promoted include sexually abusing young children. Crowley apparently felt that sodomizing a very young child was the key to eternal life, and would help the abuser steal the life energy of the abused child. I found Crowley’s theories openly available on the internet, but I wouldn’t suggest you delve into such tedious sewage unless you have a strong stomach.

To be fair, I don’t assume that everyone involved with the OTO actively practices this ritual (just like I wouldn’t assume that the average modern Catholic whips himself with a chain), but it does seem to be an essential part and parcel of the whole philosophy.

I have nothing against pagans or wiccans or people who chase after other haloweenish stuff. In most cases I think it’s probably harmless theatre. In the case of this specific philosophy, it’s really as horrendous as its harshest critics make it out to be. I hope that ibkc’s conversion to the Catholic Church is sincere, and I hope that other practitioners of this bestial garbage will grow out of it too. (I can’t imagine any healthy person being attracted to it in the first place.)

Take Care,

LaMar
 
From what I’ve been told, by Mormons, they are expected to pay 10% of their income (a full tithe) plus fast offerings. Some people pay the 10% on net income, some pay it on gross; the determination is left to the individual. Tithing is supposed to be paid before any other expenses, in other words before rent/house payments, utilities, groceries, etc. They don’t verify this, but they are asked if they pay a full tithe during the interview to get or retain a temple recommend and must answer in the affirmative to get the TR. Not paying a full tithe does not impact memebership status; but one cannot go to the temple, even to attend weddings. All funds are sent to Salt Lake City, which in turn allocates some funds back to the stakes/wards/branches. No financial information is shared with members.
the mormon version is very similar to the wealth and prosperity godspell sects it seems to me. they are big on what the tither gets in return. i think this is backasswards. of course there are quite a few various ways to interpret these things; tithing is primarily an OT thing and hardly mentioned at all in the NT at least not in detail.

in my understanding the Catholic Church does encourage a type of tithing, which is about 10% total giving with 5% to the local parish and the remainder to various other places of choice. yes that should be a minimum for someone who can do it, and most can. but Jesus happened to mention the disgrace of someone who would neglect his elderly parents in favor of tithing, and this is among the reasons the mormon and various other protestant sects who enforce this “rule” are out of touch with the spirit of the gospel.

tithing is about a lot of things. true spritual tithing should induce a lifestyle that is completely in touch with a nonwasteful set of choices. buying carefully and not frivolously, submitting all wants and desires to God for his direction, depending on God for everything. it is so much more than just a legalistic writing of a 10% check and quibbling about whether this is pre- or post-tax income. it appears to me that these sects, including the mormins, do it out of a boastfulness, pride, bragging about how much betterthey are than those apostates who only throw a dollar in the plate, if that. similar to the way they brag qbout not drinking coffee or wine. i sense this as a spiritual pride that i personally find offensive, and the way i read Jesus it might offend Him too.

and i’m not just picking on the mormans, i have witnessed this among the other protestants sects, too. humility is key, I would say. if a person tithes he should keep it to himself. pride is a real killer.
 
From what I’ve been told, by Mormons, they are expected to pay 10% of their income (a full tithe) plus fast offerings. Some people pay the 10% on net income, some pay it on gross; the determination is left to the individual. Tithing is supposed to be paid before any other expenses, in other words before rent/house payments, utilities, groceries, etc. They don’t verify this, but they are asked if they pay a full tithe during the interview to get or retain a temple recommend and must answer in the affirmative to get the TR. Not paying a full tithe does not impact memebership status; but one cannot go to the temple, even to attend weddings. All funds are sent to Salt Lake City, which in turn allocates some funds back to the stakes/wards/branches. No financial information is shared with members.
My understanding is that all the surplus is sent to SLC, after ward and stake needs are met. (edited to add: this was the case a couple of years ago, anyway…if they changed this then they’re really turning the screws.)

They have a quota, based upon demographics (average incomes, etc.) My bishop has some leeway as to how much he can keep based upon the needs of the members, so he can go below the quota if he needs to, or so he assures me. As of a couple of years ago, the surplus and an accounting got sent to the stake level, where the stake presidency can also skim a bit if one of the other wards is short.

My bishop is a pretty decent guy. When someone is in need, he actually helps them out. It’s certainly not the case in every ward though.
In our Parish, we are asked to give one hour’s salary or wage if our other needs so allow. Most people only put a dollar in the basket, which I think is inexcusable in most cases, but we somehow muddle along. We may have a second collection for a special charitable cause or if something major comes along (like a new A/C system is needed). Other than an allocated share of the diocesan administrative expenses, all funds remain in the Parish. A summary financial statement is published in the bulletin monthly and full financial statements are provided annually.
This is my biggest gripe about the LDS church. They like to yelp and kvetch about the Vatican being “full of looted treasure, stolen from holocaust victims”. (Not an exact quote, but very close to what was injected into a sunday school lesson a couple of years ago).

What are the brethren doing with my tithing money? Nobody knows. One thing many Mormons suspect is that at least a billion dollars of tithes and offerings is going toward a new shopping mall in Salt Lake City. (Maybe it’ll have a tobacconist shop in there, and a Victoria’s Secret too).

You’re not going to outer darkness, by the way. I just used the power of the holy melchizedek priesthood to release you from any foot dustings or proxy work which may be done, past or future. You’re going to Catholic heaven…unless you want to get into the Celestial Kingdom. I can make it happen for 10% of your increase, paid directly to me… 😃
 
My understanding is that all the surplus is sent to SLC, after ward and stake needs are met. (edited to add: this was the case a couple of years ago, anyway…if they changed this then they’re really turning the screws.)
I understand something was changed, though I don’t recall the details. I was told that the Wards were previously allowed to retain most (more?) of the collections and funds were therefore available for activities that everybody enjoyed. At some point this was changed and they’ve had to scale back on the fun stuff; some people are pretty P.O.ed about that too.
You’re not going to outer darkness, by the way. I just used the power of the holy melchizedek priesthood to release you from any foot dustings or proxy work which may be done, past or future. You’re going to Catholic heaven…unless you want to get into the Celestial Kingdom. I can make it happen for 10% of your increase, paid directly to me… 😃
Thanks for the reprieve from OD, LOL. Awhile back Zerinus dude was spewing some venom about people who have had repeated conversion attempts and still refuse to become Mormons. Said that puts us in the same category as apostate Mormons, i.e., sons of perdition; sooooo, off to hell we go…. Figured I’d accommodate him.

I can’t help but see the humor in some of this stuff.
 
I understand something was changed, though I don’t recall the details. I was told that the Wards were previously allowed to retain most (more?) of the collections and funds were therefore available for activities that everybody enjoyed. At some point this was changed and they’ve had to scale back on the fun stuff; some people are pretty P.O.ed about that too.
I think you might be talking about correlation (?)

Back in the 1980s, when I was a kid, the local ward could do almost anything it wanted. People could teach lessons on topics they chose themselves.

YM/YW in my ward (ie the teenagers, boys & girls together) once spent a weekend in Las Vegas, with a trip to a big water park and the mall. (Granted, we lived only an hour north of Las Vegas, but it was fun anyway). I made out with my little girlfriend in the hotel room without supervision. Some of my buddies got into trouble for playing slot machines (LOL!). This sort of thing doesn’t happen any longer. Lessons are handed down and read almost verbatim, and the youth are given cookie cutter outings to go on.

I don’t think that this stretched into the budget, but it’s something I’ll be checking on.
Thanks for the reprieve from OD, LOL. Awhile back Zerinus dude was spewing some venom about people who have had repeated conversion attempts and still refuse to become Mormons. Said that puts us in the same category as apostate Mormons, i.e., sons of perdition; sooooo, off to hell we go…. Figured I’d accommodate him.
I can’t help but see the humor in some of this stuff.
Well, Zerinus will be disappointed to know that his curse didn’t work. My priesthood magic is much more powerful than his. (He’s not correct anyway.)

I’m embarrassed about the behavior of some of the Mormons I have met on the internet. I think many are a bit too uptight, but it takes all kinds I suppose.
 
WhyMe:

Feelings are not sinful in themselves. Acting on them, and entertaining thoughts which perpetuate them is what God judges. Big difference between LDS and Catholic thinking on the subject.

Think about it.

I thought Rebecca and I made the point quite clear about there being a balance between women dressing modestly and men taking responsibility for their sexuality.
In a previous post I was referring to priests who have to administer the host to women who may be just revealing too much. I think that women need to be considerate to the priest and dress accordingly. It has been explained to my about feelings being perfectly normal etc. But I also think that women who dress immodestly in church can allow the priest to entertain thoughts that he perhaps should not be entertaining.

In terms of just guys, I would agree with you and Rebecca. Men should also take responsibility for their own sexuality.
 
the mormon version is very similar to the wealth and prosperity godspell sects it seems to me. they are big on what the tither gets in return. i think this is backasswards. of course there are quite a few various ways to interpret these things; tithing is primarily an OT thing and hardly mentioned at all in the NT at least not in detail.
The amount of tithe comes directly from the Old Testament and it has to do wth giving to god what is his. Of course the chirstian church in its early days had instructed its members to give much more than 10%… People were required to have things in common and so they sold their houses and land and possessions and laid the money at the apostles feet to be distributed accordingly. Those who lied about their possessions had their life taken from them by god. (See acts 4: 32-37; acts 5: 1-11)

Considering those times, 10% is nothing in comparison. 🙂

The mormon have something comparable to those times called the United Order. This is an interesting concept. JS tried to do it in the early days but the lds were not ready for such a sacrafice. And they still aren’t. And so, no United Order yet.

GUIDE TO THE SCRIPTURES
United Order
See also Consecrate, Law of Consecration
An organization through which the Saints in the early days of the restored Church sought to live the law of consecration. Individuals shared property, goods, and profits, receiving these things according to their wants and needs (D&C 51: 3; 78: 1-15; 104).
In your temporal things you shall be equal, D&C 70: 14. The Saints were to be organized to be equal in all things, D&C 78: 3-11 (D&C 82: 17-20). The Lord gave unto the united order a revelation and a commandment, D&C 92: 1. John Johnson should become a member of the united order, D&C 96: 6-9. The Lord gave general instructions for operating the united order, D&C 104. My people are not united according to the union required by the celestial kingdom, D&C 105: 1-13.

scriptures.lds.org/en/gs/u/6
 
The amount of tithe comes directly from the Old Testament and it has to do wth giving to god what is his. Of course the chirstian church in its early days had instructed its members to give much more than 10%… People were required to have things in common and so they sold their houses and land and possessions and laid the money at the apostles feet to be distributed accordingly. Those who lied about their possessions had their life taken from them by god. (See acts 4: 32-37; acts 5: 1-11)

Considering those times, 10% is nothing in comparison. 🙂

The mormon have something comparable to those times called the United Order. This is an interesting concept. JS tried to do it in the early days but the lds were not ready for such a sacrafice. And they still aren’t. And so, no United Order yet.

GUIDE TO THE SCRIPTURES
United Order
See also Consecrate, Law of Consecration
An organization through which the Saints in the early days of the restored Church sought to live the law of consecration. Individuals shared property, goods, and profits, receiving these things according to their wants and needs (D&C 51: 3; 78: 1-15; 104).
In your temporal things you shall be equal, D&C 70: 14. The Saints were to be organized to be equal in all things, D&C 78: 3-11 (D&C 82: 17-20). The Lord gave unto the united order a revelation and a commandment, D&C 92: 1. John Johnson should become a member of the united order, D&C 96: 6-9. The Lord gave general instructions for operating the united order, D&C 104. My people are not united according to the union required by the celestial kingdom, D&C 105: 1-13.

scriptures.lds.org/en/gs/u/6
My wife’s grandfather was the biggest non-Mormon fan of the United Order. He was born on the Lower East Side of NYC in the Jewish ghetto (my mother in law was born in Brooklyn, in another Jewish neighborhood). They came to the West coast after WWII (he was a hero in the pacific theatre).

Anyway, he wasn’t religious, but he was active in social movements and was a union organizer. He had copies of the old yiddish newspaper Freiheit that his siblings had written articles for. It was amazing how similar the philosophies were. On weekends everyone would get together and it would always be me and him in the corner, talking about socialism.

Religious communism is an old idea that predates Marx and Lenin. Jews had it before we (Mormons) did and so did the Mennonites and other Christian groups.

After Great-Grandpa died some of his ashes were taken back to NYC, and some were interned here, and we took some to Orderville, Utah, too. If there’s a worker’s paradise proletarian heaven, I’m sure he’s there and I’ll join him in it someday. 🙂
 
Since LaMar can’t handle what I have to say I know he won’t see this, but I want to clear my name for anyone else reading from his incorrect assumption that I was involved with Crowley’s crowd.
I don’t see ibkc’s posts and ordinarily don’t care too much about anything she has to say. Last week she was boasting about being in a master’s program someplace but didn’t understand terms like “cv”, so I quit wasting my time with her.
Is it possible for you to be any more unpleasant? I am studying for a MFA in studio art, and I am about midway through a 72-credit program. You never asked for a definition of the term ‘cv’. :rolleyes:
While I had a certain opinion of the person behind her posts, I am quite shocked to see that she was involved with the OTO. I didn’t have any idea that anyone here had been involved in anything that negative (and I’m glad to hear she has left that behind).
I was never in the OTO. I was an active, openly practicing pagan for many years, though, and therefore I knew people who are involved with various forms of chaos and ceremonial magic, including the OTO and Thelema. I never went in for magic, myself, beyond doing a lot of reading about it.
I have nothing against pagans or wiccans or people who chase after other haloweenish stuff. In most cases I think it’s probably harmless theatre. In the case of this specific philosophy, it’s really as horrendous as its harshest critics make it out to be. I hope that ibkc’s conversion to the Catholic Church is sincere, and I hope that other practitioners of this bestial garbage will grow out of it too. (I can’t imagine any healthy person being attracted to it in the first place.)
Wow, something we agree on. I actually began backing away from paganism when one of my fellow grove members began to get seriously invested in the OTO and working her way through the degrees. She invited my husband and I to watch her preside at the gnostic mass and I felt a visceral revulsion. At that point I realized that I was in the wrong place.
 
Hi ibkc,

I realize you’re a masochist, and anything I type to you will keep you going for another 6 months.
Since LaMar can’t handle what I have to say I know he won’t see this, but I want to clear my name for anyone else reading from his incorrect assumption that I was involved with Crowley’s crowd.
If you define “can’t handle” as “won’t waste time with” then that’s fair enough.
Is it possible for you to be any more unpleasant? I am studying for a MFA in studio art, and I am about midway through a 72-credit program. You never asked for a definition of the term ‘cv’. :rolleyes:
In our last conversation you alluded to being in a philosophy program, right before lecturing on Plotnius as the founder of neo-Platonism. (LOL!)
I was never in the OTO. I was an active, openly practicing pagan for many years, though, and therefore I knew people who are involved with various forms of chaos and ceremonial magic, including the OTO and Thelema. I never went in for magic, myself, beyond doing a lot of reading about it.

Wow, something we agree on. I actually began backing away from paganism when one of my fellow grove members began to get seriously invested in the OTO and working her way through the degrees. She invited my husband and I to watch her preside at the gnostic mass and I felt a visceral revulsion. At that point I realized that I was in the wrong place.
Sounds like you change religions as often as you switch majors. Paganism, different forms of Satanism, Mormonism, now the Roman Catholic church.

My own opinion of you is based not upon the various beliefs you’ve adhered to and abandoned, but upon your behavior; and nothing you’ve written here disabuses me of the reputation you’ve earned. You seem entirely incapable of functioning without some sort of conflict in your life. I think that’s sad, and I wish you peace.

LaMar
 
In our last conversation you alluded to being in a philosophy program, right before lecturing on Plotnius as the founder of neo-Platonism. (LOL!)
No, I did not allude to any such thing. You made that assumption based on the fact that I told you I took a master’s-level class on the philosophical underpinnings of Renaissance thought especially as related to aesthetics. The class started with Plato and tracked the development of philosophy and art until the Renaissance.

You make assumptions all the time, based on nothing. If you need clarification about something, ask. Don’t assume.

ETA: LOL! You did it again!
Sounds like you change religions as often as you switch majors. Paganism, different forms of Satanism, Mormonism, now the Roman Catholic church.
Assumptions! Oh, my. I was never a Mormon. I was never a Satanist. I was Christian in my youth, then nothing, then pagan, now I am Christian.

Stop assuming things. ASK!
 
No, I did not allude to any such thing. You made that assumption based on the fact that I told you I took a master’s-level class on the philosophical underpinnings of Renaissance thought especially as related to aesthetics. The class started with Plato and tracked the development of philosophy and art until the Renaissance.

You make assumptions all the time, based on nothing. If you need clarification about something, ask. Don’t assume.
Here’s the thread in question:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=3458992#post3458992

People who constantly seek out conflicts aren’t the type of people I surround myself with. I wouldn’t ask such a person anything, as there’s nothing she could possibly teach me. (The above interaction is evidence enough of that much). I don’t care to converse with you. I simply wish you peace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top