In a press release ESA announced that the measurements from their 2010-2011 campaigns show the height of Antarctic ice to be an average of nine centimetres higher than the measurements obtained during the 2008-2009 campaigns.
You are just to easy.arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.antarctic.png
ANYONE that doesn’t follow…is a conspirator.
SamH we must consult with that great authority Al Gore before deciding the credibilty of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research.
Hiyas!
I’ll tell you if that’s true when I find one.
When the scale is thousands of years, 17 is a blip.
This does not reflect reality. As usual, they figured out the flaws themselves and corrected then. Then some know-nothings came along, found the old data, didn’t know there was new, more complete data, and complained.
How do I debate a graph that doesn’t even have x and y-axis labels? I don’t even know what period in history its supposed to apply to!Debate the graphs - so far you have offered NO support for your claims. I would have to give it way more cred than you?
Ha ha ha ha!
It wasn’t greenhouse gases. Something was causing cooling, but greenhouse gases literally cannot cause cooling. It violates the laws of physics.
Do not equate your inability to understand the proof with their inability to provide it. They provided it. You seem to have some mental block preventing you from understanding it. I’d say it’s not their problem, but the truth is that your perspective leads to disrespect of the environment and further pollution and global warming which could potentially wind up being apocalyptic eventually, so it’s everybody’s problem.With backing like that you’d think you could offer concrete proof of your claims.
It’s posts such as this that cause me not to take any claims you make serious.
No like most Leftist thought it’s about the elites having greater control over us great unwashed. It’s just like Obamacare was NEVER about healthcare. Sometimes I wonder if we are living in l984Hiyas!
Mr. Bjorn Lomborg is very credible IMO.
AGW-CAGW has NEVER been about the environment.
where up is down and truth is false.I don’t know why in the world you think that data supports your claims. Perhaps you are not reading it right?
And how is “please respect the environment and use less energy so we burn less fossil fuels and preserve the environment” about control? And since when is it leftist?No like most Leftist thought it’s about the elites having greater control over us great unwashed. It’s just like Obamacare was NEVER about healthcare. Sometimes I wonder if we are living in l984
Lisa
You have not supported your thousand year claim - below I’ll support my 1970 claim.
I gave you the link.
He used Mr James Hansen’s program.
Since when does someone who doesn’t believe the facts don’t support the AGW-CAGW anti-environmental?
I would bet 99.99% of “Enviornmentalists” are Leftists. It has become a new religion complete with a creed, rites and a dogma. Conservatives as the name denotes want to conserve but what the Enviro-nuts continue to promote isn’t a nice “please respect the environment…” approach but demands for taxes, fines, and wealth transfers (another sign of Leftism).
I firmly believe, reading comprehension is an acquired skill.
CNN - BBC???
arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/