Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn’t bother with that point. In 48 hours they will all funnel into arguments that are essentially handed to them that might assert anything. Just look how far they have moved from perfect phone call
 
Just look how far the Dems have moved from bribery and abuse of power to Trump possibly thinking about bribery …
 
Adam Schiff used these past 2 months for grandstanding that is for sure. If there is one person I hope to rarely see in the future, other than Nancy Pelosi, it is Adam Schiff.
 
The Democrats moved how? The articles were voted on by the House. Bolton makes clear they are true.
 
Bolton is on tape saying he has know problem lying under certain circumstances.He has zero credibility.He is a disgruntled ex staffer,again no credibility.
 
Cross examine him. Sammy Gravano took the stand with over 30 murders and still sent Gotti away
 
If you call not being truthful a legal talent. He is hoping for Diane Feinstein’s seat maybe, so he is trying to make a name for himself and go down in history books. Those eyes…
 
Just because the GAO concluded the OMB withheld funds for a policy reason, not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act doesn’t make it so.
 
mrad25 said:
Just because the GAO concluded the OMB withheld funds for a policy reason, not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act doesn’t make it so.
Click to expand...
Just because the office tasked to determine such things determined this doesn’t make it so?

“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

— George Orwell, “1984”
 
Celebrate :smiling_face_with_three_hearts: - Dems just lost their hope to call witnesses. The vote called was 51-49. Next step - acquittal!!!
 
Last edited:
YourNameHere said:
Bolton’s confirmation that Trump held up funds from the Ukraine would be confirmation that Trump broke the law.
That is a lot more of a story than Trump’s gastric tract.
If Trump has nothing to hide, let Bolton testify.
Those who love Donald Trump won’t be swayed regardless of what Bolton says about him. But it would confirm that Trump was guilty of holding up funding from the Ukraine that had already been approved by both houses of Congress.
Click to expand...
Bolton’s confirmation or non-confirmation of those allegations would not demonstrate that Trump broke any law. It is not only his right, but his duty to at least attempt to initiate investigation of high-level corruption such as Bidens’, and particularly when Joe Biden might well have been guilty of obstruction of justice.

Bolton will tell what he knows and perhaps what he dreams up, but most likely his speculations, whether he testifies or not.
CradleRC58 said:
Not impeachable.
Click to expand...
The impoundment legislation is almost certainly unconstitutional. But even if not, Trump gave them the aid; lethal aid first, then non-lethal later. GAO thinks or at least says it’s not lawful, DOJ says it isn’t. But either way, it’s not criminal, but administrative.

The alleged “abuse of power” was said to be in “pressuring” Ukraine to do something both were required to do anyway. There was no evidence of that whatever. None. And both the president of Ukraine and the U.S. denied it. The only shame is that there was no investigation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top