Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cont.

“Section F stated that Chairman Nadler can impose “appropriate remedies” if the president “unlawfully” refuses to make witnesses available or to produce requested documents for any of the six investigating committees. These remedies included” denying specific requests by the President or his counsel under these procedures to call or question witnesses.” AGAIN unprecedented.

Mr. Nadler claimed the ability to determine when the president has acted “unlawfully” in relation to committees over which he has no authority. And, when he does (based on whatever standards or criteria he alone chooses), Mr. Nadler said he can bar the president — the impeachment defendant — from participating at all in the Judiciary Committee’s hearings. AGAIN unprecedented.

House Democrats chose to reject precedent on numerous fronts and opted instead for a glaringly partisan, unbalanced and novel process unlike anything EVER seen.”
 
Last edited:
A trial with absolutely no evidence or witnesses allowed isn’t a trial, it’s a sham. Trump stands for greed, corruption, and basically the antithesis of what Christianity is truly supposed to be. I will never understand how Christians can support him with the horrid things he does. Nixon did far less .
 
What was the difference this time?
Nixon had access to a grand jury and Clinton also via special counsel.
They took discovery depos there.
Those depos then forwarded to the house.
That price was done with the INTEL COMMITTEE HERE. The grand jury depos did not permit counsel or cross.
Trump received much more due process with 100 GOP CONGRESSMEN asking questions on Trump’s behalf.
Trump was invited to call witnesses before the Judiciary Committee I WRITINGS AND DECLINED.
HE said he would call witnesses in the Senate then didn’t.
Clearly Trump did not want to call witnesses( save for the Whisleblower off limits).
The House majority made rules for this situation.
The Dems asked the DOJ to do the investigated. Apparently Trump cannot even be investigated.
None of this is relevant to not calling witnesses at trial. Like playing the superbowl with no football.
 
Two or three transactions. Other than that, he need not be Christian in any regard.
 
Which party supports abortion and changing the definition of marriage to appease sodomites ?

What Christian would support them ?
 
Apparently your understanding of Sodom is limited. SCOTUS permitted same sex marriage. Was it Kennedy, a GOP appointee who wrote the opinion?
 
Last edited:
Ethics codes for lawyers prohibit them from representing clients in cases where they are witnesses or accomplices, but lo and behold:

www.nytimes.com

Trump Told Bolton to Help His Ukraine Pressure Campaign, Book Says (Published 2020)

The president asked his national security adviser last spring in front of other senior advisers to pave the way for a meeting between Rudolph Giuliani and Ukraine’s new leader.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
Mr. Trump gave the instruction, Mr. Bolton wrote, during an Oval Office conversation in early May that included the acting White House chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, the president’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani and the White House counsel, Pat A. Cipollone, who is now leading the president’s impeachment defense.
Click to expand...
 
You have the unfortunate attraction to exclusivity. ( Makes you more worthy?). It is a phenomena that in my opinion, acts on whatever was the thinking of the good son in the PRODICAL son.
 
Last edited:
What do you really think, 7_sorrows? Do you agree that if there had been a fair investigation in the house then perhaps some Republicans would have joined their democrat counterparts? You know, if the evidence was overwhelming and uncontested then there were bound to be some republicans in touchy districts who dislike the President so much that they would have jumped on that band wagon to get rid of Donald Trump. But it was such a set up. Schiff and Nadler, I think, really didn’t want impeachment… That would have been a miracle! What they wanted was something to talk about on the campaign trail that might appease their base. “What a bad man Donald is and what terrible people those Republicans are… they were so unfair they wouldn’t do our job for us…”
 
President Trump is draining the swamp. FISA warrants, Steele Dossier, Michael Avenati just to name a few. Spies everywhere ready to sabotage President
Trump and get rid of him. They are afraid what he has
already exposed and what still hasn’t been uncovered.
Republicans still have values and respect for law and
order and President Trump is not a king nor a monarch
nor is he trying to be one.
 
And I just want to add this to your remarks… It was so sad to see my Democratic senator vote down party lines even though it went against all the history and tradition of the Senate. He voted to have more witnesses which would make the Senate the ones doing the IMPEACHMENT and then they would have to CONVICT also. All the House had to do is indite a ham sandwich…they didn’t have to have a fair investigation… (Oh, but that had that with Mueller–where the President turned over lots of papers and people…) How long will this persecution go on?
 
And they are supposed to use the evidence provided by the House’s Investigation. Without an investigation in the House all the representatives have is rumor and innuendo… It’s not the Senate’s job to investigate… If that were the case the House could throw anything made up in the mix and expect the Senate to make a pie out of it… Oh wait, that’s what happened…
 
mrad25 said:
Yes, their reasoning accuses that aid was withheld solely because of one reason, even though there is no mention of aid in the transcript and even though back in June they were aware that aid was under review and appropriate departments were made aware. They made a determination that even Congress has not made yet and that the DOJ rejected.
Click to expand...
See the explanation starting at around 19:50 in this video:

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top