Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You mean, that she’s been exonerated once and that wasn’t good enough for you,
When they exonerate her before investigating one can not be much blamed for doubting.
the Republican playbook for Presidential elections for this entire century is to demonize the Democratic opponents with falsehoods.
No need. They’re entirely capable for demonizing themselves with the truth.
 
When they exonerate her before investigating one can not be much blamed for doubting.
So, there was an investigation or there wasn’t? You can’t keep the talking points straight.
No need. They’re entirely capable for demonizing themselves with the truth.
So the lies shouldn’t be necessary. And, yet, we have Kerry’s a coward, Obama was born in Kenya, Clinton’s emails and Biden’s corrupt. All lies, but the lies get repeated over and over again, while actual substance doesn’t.
 
So the lies shouldn’t be necessary. And, yet, we have Kerry’s a coward, Obama was born in Kenya, Clinton’s emails and Biden’s corrupt.
Might as well add “the moon is made of green cheese”, but it wouldn’t make your comparison more ridiculous.
 
I’m kinda hoping the left keeps this tin foil hat thing going. I believe there are logical people that maybe in the past voted liberal ideology but have to be scratching their heads at what the democratic party has become. Especially those that consider themselves Pro Life. I think this whole farce(s) has only strengthened President Trump.
 
Might as well add “the moon is made of green cheese”, but it wouldn’t make your comparison more ridiculous.
Is the comparison more apt when we do it with former Republican ‘talking points’ such as Obama’s birthplace? What has more credibility: Obama was born in Kenya or the tooth fairy steals teeth. We could move it to Kerry’s supposed cowardice. And Hillary’s emails (Oh, I know: the investigation hasn’t happened, has happened but was flawed; is happening, one of those).

Same old Republican playbook for Biden and Ukraine. But it won’t spot this site with being filled with those falsehoods.
 
Wow, on Jan 25 I issued a spoiler alert that the Senate wouldn’t convict and I was RIGHT!!

How oh how could I have known that?

Can we please quit arguing about the evidence? It was enough to get him impeached by an extremely partial Democratic House and didn’t result in a conviction by an extremely partial Republican Senate. There was nothing impartial about the process from start to finish. Had the political parties of all the players been reversed, it would have played out just the same way.

This Congress would impeach for jaywalking and yet it wouldn’t convict for an impulse shooting on 5th Avenue if the video showing it had gone viral. It is a farce and an embarrassment.
 
Last edited:
ame old Republican playbook for Biden and Ukraine. But it won’t spot this site with being filled with those falsehoods.
You can’t say anything about the Biden/Ukraine deal until it’s investigated, let alone that anything known about it so far is a “falsehood”.
 
You can’t say anything about the Biden/Ukraine deal until it’s investigated,
Actually there is a significant contemporanoues record of Biden’s efforts on behalf of the administration and the world in place for some years. We know what happened and why.
 
You can’t say anything about the Biden/Ukraine deal until it’s investigated, let alone that anything known about it so far is a “falsehood”.
Sure, I can. I can point out correctly that no one at the time thought Biden’s actions were an issue, that there were several Republican Senators that had issues with Shokin as well, that it only became an issue when Trump tried to extort Ukraine into an investigation into Biden because Biden was running against him, and, finally, that Trump was a big ‘birther’ claiming that “you wouldn’t believe what we’re finding” in Hawaii on Obama’s birth.

It’s a falsehood, but it is the Republican playbook to lie about their Presidential political opponents as they have done so for the last 4 Presidential elections and are looking to do so in this one as well.
 
I can point out correctly that no one at the time thought Biden’s actions were an issue
I believe people in the Obama administration did, indeed, have concerns about it.


 
Well, we can’t deny the democrat playbook is not against telling lies about their political opponents not only during the presidential election, but after the opponent is elected they will continue to spread lies.
 
I believe people in the Obama administration did, indeed, have concerns about it.

New York Post – 15 Nov 19

191115-hunter-biden-obama-administration-column.jpg

Obama administration knew Hunter Biden was shady, witness admits

Of all the supposedly shocking revelations that have emerged from the impeachment hearings this week, here’s one that the Democrats in Congress hope you don’t hear about: The Obama White House knew…

favicon.30333d68dff6.ico
The Washington Times

Trump_Impeachment_30115.jpg-dc07c_c0-228-5472-3420_s1200x700.jpg

Obama officials wary of Hunter Biden’s big-money job, ousted Ukraine…

Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch revealed at an impeachment hearing Friday that Hunter Biden’s job at a Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holding was a major issue for the Obama White House.
Then let me be more clear: no one had concerns about Joe Biden’s actions in case you misunderstood what I said.
 
Well, we can’t deny the democrat playbook is not against telling lies about their political opponents not only during the presidential election, but after the opponent is elected they will continue to spread lies.
I don’t think they’ll waste a minute trying to get Trump out of office. I think they have already started, actually.

 
I don’t think they’ll waste a minute trying to get Trump out of office. I think they have already started, actually.

favicon.ico
Fox News

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Trump Impeachment 2.0: Historic fight spurs new probes and clashes even after…

The Senate impeachment trial of President Trump may have ended with an acquittal, but ongoing legal battles and hints of future subpoenas show that the drama between Congress and the White House is far fr
Well, I guess they ought to call Bolton to the House to testify since that wasn’t allowed in the Senate. Impeachment of Donald J. Trump - #3026 by drcube
 
Well, we can’t deny the democrat playbook is not against telling lies about their political opponents not only during the presidential election, but after the opponent is elected they will continue to spread lies.
Please point out specific lies.
 
Then let me be more clear: no one had concerns about Joe Biden’s actions in case you misunderstood what I said.
If you read the second article, you’ll see that the Obama administration was concerned about Joe Biden’s conflict of interest. It wasn’t just Hunter Biden.
 
40.png
7_Sorrows:
Well, we can’t deny the democrat playbook is not against telling lies about their political opponents not only during the presidential election, but after the opponent is elected they will continue to spread lies.
I don’t think they’ll waste a minute trying to get Trump out of office. I think they have already started, actually.

Trump Impeachment 2.0: Historic fight spurs new probes and clashes even after trial | Fox News
They don’t seem to be concerned about the November
elections. Americans are tired of the antics and
shenanigans of the democrats. The democrats must want to
dig their own graves before this November.
 
Well, I guess they ought to call Bolton to the House to testify since that wasn’t allowed in the Senate.
If they think Bolton can hurt Trump more than just criticizing his foreign policy, they will. They might call him just to have him say he didn’t agree in the case of this country or that country or some war Trump wouldn’t start, but I doubt it since the Bolton testimony might be really weak, which would make the Dems look even worse than they do now.

But personally, I think Bolton will want to keep “teasing” until his book comes out. I see where Bolton has already refused to sign a sworn affidavit for them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top