D
drcube
Guest
That was @Sirach2, not me.Don’t ask questions about," what logical person," when that question baits someone who followed the case. It’s insulting
That was @Sirach2, not me.Don’t ask questions about," what logical person," when that question baits someone who followed the case. It’s insulting
When they exonerate her before investigating one can not be much blamed for doubting.You mean, that she’s been exonerated once and that wasn’t good enough for you,
No need. They’re entirely capable for demonizing themselves with the truth.the Republican playbook for Presidential elections for this entire century is to demonize the Democratic opponents with falsehoods.
So, there was an investigation or there wasn’t? You can’t keep the talking points straight.When they exonerate her before investigating one can not be much blamed for doubting.
So the lies shouldn’t be necessary. And, yet, we have Kerry’s a coward, Obama was born in Kenya, Clinton’s emails and Biden’s corrupt. All lies, but the lies get repeated over and over again, while actual substance doesn’t.No need. They’re entirely capable for demonizing themselves with the truth.
Might as well add “the moon is made of green cheese”, but it wouldn’t make your comparison more ridiculous.So the lies shouldn’t be necessary. And, yet, we have Kerry’s a coward, Obama was born in Kenya, Clinton’s emails and Biden’s corrupt.
Is the comparison more apt when we do it with former Republican ‘talking points’ such as Obama’s birthplace? What has more credibility: Obama was born in Kenya or the tooth fairy steals teeth. We could move it to Kerry’s supposed cowardice. And Hillary’s emails (Oh, I know: the investigation hasn’t happened, has happened but was flawed; is happening, one of those).Might as well add “the moon is made of green cheese”, but it wouldn’t make your comparison more ridiculous.
You can’t say anything about the Biden/Ukraine deal until it’s investigated, let alone that anything known about it so far is a “falsehood”.ame old Republican playbook for Biden and Ukraine. But it won’t spot this site with being filled with those falsehoods.
Actually there is a significant contemporanoues record of Biden’s efforts on behalf of the administration and the world in place for some years. We know what happened and why.You can’t say anything about the Biden/Ukraine deal until it’s investigated,
Sure, I can. I can point out correctly that no one at the time thought Biden’s actions were an issue, that there were several Republican Senators that had issues with Shokin as well, that it only became an issue when Trump tried to extort Ukraine into an investigation into Biden because Biden was running against him, and, finally, that Trump was a big ‘birther’ claiming that “you wouldn’t believe what we’re finding” in Hawaii on Obama’s birth.You can’t say anything about the Biden/Ukraine deal until it’s investigated, let alone that anything known about it so far is a “falsehood”.
I believe people in the Obama administration did, indeed, have concerns about it.I can point out correctly that no one at the time thought Biden’s actions were an issue
Then let me be more clear: no one had concerns about Joe Biden’s actions in case you misunderstood what I said.I believe people in the Obama administration did, indeed, have concerns about it.
New York Post – 15 Nov 19
Obama administration knew Hunter Biden was shady, witness admits
Of all the supposedly shocking revelations that have emerged from the impeachment hearings this week, here’s one that the Democrats in Congress hope you don’t hear about: The Obama White House knew…
The Washington Times
Obama officials wary of Hunter Biden’s big-money job, ousted Ukraine…
Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch revealed at an impeachment hearing Friday that Hunter Biden’s job at a Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holding was a major issue for the Obama White House.
I don’t think they’ll waste a minute trying to get Trump out of office. I think they have already started, actually.Well, we can’t deny the democrat playbook is not against telling lies about their political opponents not only during the presidential election, but after the opponent is elected they will continue to spread lies.
Well, I guess they ought to call Bolton to the House to testify since that wasn’t allowed in the Senate. Impeachment of Donald J. Trump - #3026 by drcubeI don’t think they’ll waste a minute trying to get Trump out of office. I think they have already started, actually.
Fox News
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
Trump Impeachment 2.0: Historic fight spurs new probes and clashes even after…
The Senate impeachment trial of President Trump may have ended with an acquittal, but ongoing legal battles and hints of future subpoenas show that the drama between Congress and the White House is far fr
Please point out specific lies.Well, we can’t deny the democrat playbook is not against telling lies about their political opponents not only during the presidential election, but after the opponent is elected they will continue to spread lies.
If you read the second article, you’ll see that the Obama administration was concerned about Joe Biden’s conflict of interest. It wasn’t just Hunter Biden.Then let me be more clear: no one had concerns about Joe Biden’s actions in case you misunderstood what I said.
They don’t seem to be concerned about the November7_Sorrows:
I don’t think they’ll waste a minute trying to get Trump out of office. I think they have already started, actually.Well, we can’t deny the democrat playbook is not against telling lies about their political opponents not only during the presidential election, but after the opponent is elected they will continue to spread lies.
Trump Impeachment 2.0: Historic fight spurs new probes and clashes even after trial | Fox News
If they think Bolton can hurt Trump more than just criticizing his foreign policy, they will. They might call him just to have him say he didn’t agree in the case of this country or that country or some war Trump wouldn’t start, but I doubt it since the Bolton testimony might be really weak, which would make the Dems look even worse than they do now.Well, I guess they ought to call Bolton to the House to testify since that wasn’t allowed in the Senate.