A
Aquinas11
Guest
Notice this seems to be a constant theme with Democrats. I don’t like this person. Get rid of them. Doesn’t matter whether they’re duly elected.Just get him gone.
Notice this seems to be a constant theme with Democrats. I don’t like this person. Get rid of them. Doesn’t matter whether they’re duly elected.Just get him gone.
This is the seventh impeachment in the House…so when you say “would do” which of the 7 Democrat Impeachment debacles are you referring to?Yes, it was certainly prescient to see that Trump would do something worth impeachment
Yes, hence why they’ve been talking impeachment since 2016Democrats are obsessed with 2016
Thanks for the info.The next steps are the appointment of Hoiuse managers who present this case at the trial in the Senate.
So Pelosi is not going to “do her job” ie get the managers appointed because she thinks someone else wont do their job?“do his job” = do what is obligated for the trial under Senate rules
I think you mean the narrative that the Dems concocted, misrepresented, repeated, and shoved down everyone’s skulls colluding with the fake news media. It’s something the Senate recognizes as such because they witnessed it as it was occurring. (as do just about all Americans who actually look at what they are doing in stunned disbelief of their reprehensible sedition).to actually listen to and weigh the evidence.
[sarcasm] No, no, he’s supposed to be a good boy and cooperate in the Democrat manufactured process of personal destruction. [/sarcasm]The principle complaint against Trump is his unwillingness to participate in the efforts to destroy him. That’s basically what the obstruction of Congress charge is.
Well since the articles of intemperance haven’t been sent to the Senate it’s not too late to amend them.Curious, why is Rudy Giuliani running around Ukraine, acting as an irregular channel and getting ambassadors fired?
Who does he work for? The state department? No
The justice department? No
He works for the president. So does the state department. So does the justice department. Trump can send whoever he wants to Ukraine.Curious, why is Rudy Giuliani running around Ukraine, acting as an irregular channel and getting ambassadors fired?
Who does he work for? The state department? No
The justice department? No
![]()
The only thing he was charged with, among those, is “refusing to allow his people to testify”, the technical term for which is “invoking executive privilege”, which he is allowed to do. Congress then has the option of going to court, which they declined to do because were in too much of a hurry to actually do their job.Trump should be apologizing for many things, including lying to Congress and the American people, refusing to allow his people to testify, etc.
You realize it’s quite unethical to misquote me, right?gracepoole:![]()
Yes, hence why they’ve been talking impeachment since 2016Democrats are obsessed with 2016
Really? Who are these “just about all Americans”? Please provide an impartial source.gracepoole:![]()
I think you mean the narrative that the Dems concocted, misrepresented, repeated, and shoved down everyone’s skulls colluding with the fake news media. It’s something the Senate recognizes as such because they witnessed it as it was occurring. (as do just about all Americans who actually look at what they are doing in stunned disbelief of their reprehensible sedition).to actually listen to and weigh the evidence.