Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
We are living the dream.Unprecedented unemployment,record numbers of conservative district and federal judges,stock market soaring,illegal immigrants coming across record lows the past several months,I could go on and on but you get the gist.Surely you have benefited from the great work of a President Trump.This is what is behind this bs from the leftist Dems.They are only relevant if people are suffering. Now how pathetic and disordered is that way of thinking?🤨
 
Last edited:
Yes, it was certainly prescient to see that Trump would do something worth impeachment
This is the seventh impeachment in the House…so when you say “would do” which of the 7 Democrat Impeachment debacles are you referring to?
 
The next steps are the appointment of Hoiuse managers who present this case at the trial in the Senate.
Thanks for the info.
“do his job” = do what is obligated for the trial under Senate rules
So Pelosi is not going to “do her job” ie get the managers appointed because she thinks someone else wont do their job?
 
He also lost his law license and provided blood samples.

Trump instructed witnesses to ignore subpoenas.
 
And taking an oath to be impartial when he’s got no intention to be impartial.
 
to actually listen to and weigh the evidence.
I think you mean the narrative that the Dems concocted, misrepresented, repeated, and shoved down everyone’s skulls colluding with the fake news media. It’s something the Senate recognizes as such because they witnessed it as it was occurring. (as do just about all Americans who actually look at what they are doing in stunned disbelief of their reprehensible sedition).
 
What conservatism currently means seems to have changed over the years. It seems to me “Anything Trump says” is the current working meaning.
 
What about the D ms being liberals? They are a mere shadow of liberalisme being high jacked by the leftist progressives.🤨
 
Last edited:
The principle complaint against Trump is his unwillingness to participate in the efforts to destroy him. That’s basically what the obstruction of Congress charge is.
[sarcasm] No, no, he’s supposed to be a good boy and cooperate in the Democrat manufactured process of personal destruction. [/sarcasm]

You are, of course, absolutely correct!
 
Curious, why is Rudy Giuliani running around Ukraine, acting as an irregular channel and getting ambassadors fired?

Who does he work for? The state department? No
The justice department? No

🤔
 
Curious, why is Rudy Giuliani running around Ukraine, acting as an irregular channel and getting ambassadors fired?

Who does he work for? The state department? No
The justice department? No
Well since the articles of intemperance haven’t been sent to the Senate it’s not too late to amend them.
 
Curious, why is Rudy Giuliani running around Ukraine, acting as an irregular channel and getting ambassadors fired?

Who does he work for? The state department? No
The justice department? No

🤔
He works for the president. So does the state department. So does the justice department. Trump can send whoever he wants to Ukraine.
 
I take no joy in the fact that Trump is impeached. However, Trump’s actions necessitated this outcome. No one has disputed the facts as they were presented during the House hearings. Instead of addressing the facts of the case, the Republicans have attacked the process, and have offered variations of the “it might have been wrong but it wasn’t impeachable” defense. Sunlight is always the best disinfectant. If Trump is innocent, then the White House should have no problem in providing all requested documents and in letting Mulvaney, Bolton, and others testify under oath in a Senate trial.
 
I think Trump has been wanting a full trial in the Senate. It’s Lindsay Graham and others who want to short-circuit it just to get it over with.
 
Trump should be apologizing for many things, including lying to Congress and the American people, refusing to allow his people to testify, etc.
The only thing he was charged with, among those, is “refusing to allow his people to testify”, the technical term for which is “invoking executive privilege”, which he is allowed to do. Congress then has the option of going to court, which they declined to do because were in too much of a hurry to actually do their job.
 
40.png
gracepoole:
Democrats are obsessed with 2016
Yes, hence why they’ve been talking impeachment since 2016
You realize it’s quite unethical to misquote me, right?
 
40.png
gracepoole:
to actually listen to and weigh the evidence.
I think you mean the narrative that the Dems concocted, misrepresented, repeated, and shoved down everyone’s skulls colluding with the fake news media. It’s something the Senate recognizes as such because they witnessed it as it was occurring. (as do just about all Americans who actually look at what they are doing in stunned disbelief of their reprehensible sedition).
Really? Who are these “just about all Americans”? Please provide an impartial source.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top