Awantz, I’m afraid you have either been badly misinformed or you have misunderstood something. It would be no surprise to me if someone Catholich had told you inaccurate things, but in the case of a bishop, I must assume that he gave you correct information, but his words were not explained to you in due detail by others.
First of all, you need to read about the sacrifice of mass and the sacrificial priesthood. Here are some links:
Transsubstantiation
Sacrifice of Mass
Priesthood
If you will sport a direct quotation:
The Christian law also has necessarily its priesthood to carry out the Divine service, the principal act of which is the Eucharistic Sacrifice, the figure and renewal of that of Calvary. How many Protestants believe this?
Believing some community worship is necessary and some people need to lead it, is not the same as believing in the sacrifice of mass, transsubstantiation and sacrificial priesthood.
As for divorce, again, you’ve been badly misinformed. Divorce is
not allowed and I’m going to give you a quotation from the canon law, straight from the Vatican homepage:
Can. 1141 A marriage that is ratum et consummatum can be dissolved by no human power and by no cause, except death.
No priest you may know, no RCIA instructor, not even a bishop can trump this. What you are talking about with regard to your friends is probably a civil divorce. If someone’s marriage is null and void sacramentally, he can dissolve the civil marriage and marry again. But this is not because of the civil divorce. It’s because the sacramental marriage didn’t in fact take place.
Another thing is that no Catholic is free to skip Confession. In the ordinary course, Confession is necessary for the remission of mortal sins. No Catholic priest or bishop will tell you that Confession is optional and that you can take advantage of it or choose not to. Similarly, priests must be ordained by bishops and no one can walk around claiming he’s been ordained by God. Also similarly, the fact that some Catholics do not believe in what the Church teaches doesn’t remove anything from the teaching. It simply means that those people don’t accept the magisterial teaching (
Magisterium) of the Church by which they are bound.
As for “annulment”, that’s an incorrect name (my canon law professor would be mad with a student for using it), suggesting a marriage can be made null - an-null, i.e. make-null. A marriage is either valid or null. When two people exchange marital vows, they either do it or merely attempt to and fail in the attempt. When they don’t successfully enter into marriage, there’s no marriage and, after examination by a competent Church tribunal, if the marriage is found null by that tribunal, the people will be free to marry. But this is
not divorce.
To sum up, I stronly suggest reading up at least on the Catholic faith, if not also on Protestant ones. You need to have your Protestant pastor tell you honestly what he believes happens on the altar and what his denomination believes. I will remind you that Lutheranism was founded on the principle that mass in the Catholic sense of the word was redundant. And no, “mass” is not the same as “service”. From the point of view of Catholic theology, a Protestant service is a community prayer of laymen, without the Eucharist being consecrated, without any sacrament taking place, which is basically the same as when lay Catholics gather for prayer without a priest and without mass.
The above leads me to suggest that perhaps you should read up on Protestant theology too.