Is any TV show immune to the left's agenda?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tolle_Lege
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How do you know any of this?
I know it because my daughter has worked in the industry since 2001 in the techie field. She earns a decent living from it–not rich by any means, but she’s not a struggling actor living in her car or a community theater volunteer in our Midwestern area. She moved away from the Midwest in 2001, and has never come back for more than a few days for family visits.

She’s earned her MFA from a large, highly-respected California university, and worked in California for several years before moving to NYC. She has also done work in London with Royal Shakespeare Company.

She has worked and is currently working with the best–Tony, Oscar, Emmy, and Obie winners and nominees. She has successfully navigated the “politics” of the industry. She has also taught in several colleges in NYC. She never lacks for work in her field.

And most importantly, she has maintained her faith.
 
Last edited:
Is any TV show immune to it now?
Depending on whether or not you have cable, satellite, or you stream, I would venture to say with the numerous TV shows available for viewing, you could simply use your remote and find more than a couple. If we settle, and watch anyway, then if we are victims, and we have made ourselves victims.
 
Last edited:
I was quoting GLAAD. They want the numbers to continue upward.
What is your preference? Are you saying that you would rather that gay people did not appear in movies or TV at all? Or is it how they are portrayed that bothers you?
 
Ed has already explained himself TMC, no need to keep questioning and stirring up. We all dont want homosexuality portrayed in movies as a good and as a norm, because its not the truth.

Not only that, but to put homosexuals in movies just to normalize homosexuality is an evil intention and a sin.
 
Last edited:
I get so weary of the daily - left vs. right - stiff in our society.
I pray today that the continual divide between left, right, and in between lessens, and we get on with praising God in all that we say and do, and in loving and serving our brothers and sisters in this world.
 
What is your preference? Are you saying that you would rather that gay people did not appear in movies or TV at all? Or is it how they are portrayed that bothers you?
It does not bother me so much that there is a group out there seeking to pressure the media to depict their chosen moral code more often and in the way that they like, openly using entertainment to change social mores. This isn’t unusual; lots of groups do it. Lots of playwrights do it. In the days of morality plays, even the Church did it.

It bothers me very greatly that for nearly a quarter of a century this group has been doing this very openly in the hopes that they can erase the influence of existing moral teachings such as those of the Catholic Church and yet there are Catholic viewers who can read the group’s annual reports and still somehow deny that the group is doing it!

Instead of rejecting entertainment that actively tries to lead them to reject tenets of their faith, these Catholics have increasingly fallen into line with the moral code their entertainment tells them to follow. Many even want the Church to do the same!! Many Christian denominations have gone that way; it is very sad and very alarming. Anybody who thinks that we will not be directly attacked for our beliefs as a result of the efforts of GLAAD just isn’t listening to what GLAAD openly says its agenda is, which is full societal agreement with their moral code.
I get so weary of the daily - left vs. right - stiff in our society.
I pray today that the continual divide between left, right, and in between lessens, and we get on with praising God in all that we say and do, and in loving and serving our brothers and sisters in this world.
I get very weary if right-vs-left being given priority over moral-vs-immoral. There is a big difference.

Right vs left can be a difference of opinion about which moral course of action is most likely to achieve a just society. For instance, right vs left might differ about whether it is in the interest of society to criminalize some immoral action or to give financial incentives to encourage some moral action or whether to move some moral goal from the private sector into the work of the public sector.

That kind of right-vs-left, we can live with. A major divide over what ends are moral and what ends are immoral, OTOH, is likely to become the undoing of our society, since these are serious matters that can make political compromise difficult or impossible to achieve.
 
Last edited:
I’m glad to hear that. Unfortunately, Hollywood worships the following:
  1. Profanity
  2. Nudity
  3. Heterosexual sexual immorality
  4. LGBTQ sexual immorality
They want Christians to like all of the above.
 
Christians need to be witnesses to the truth. Man has only two choices: to pursue what is good and virtuous or to pursue evil.
 
From what I have seen, there is no such thing as compromise. Those who are liberal think they are right. Those who are conservative think they are right. Those in the middle, believe they are being bullied by the left and the right.
 
The trouble is though that many Christians say they are Christians, but do not behave like Christians. For example, we have a man in the White House who dated porn stats. Yet, because he, now, stands against abortion, many Christians just kind of look the other way. There are children being imprisoned along the US-Mexico border. This is not a Christian-way of dealing people.
 
The man in the White House represents himself only. And the fake sympathy for the oppressed I reject.
 
Nor do you. You argue simply to be argumentative. I have read enough of your posts to understand that.
 
That is entirely false. I have all the facts. Hollywood is Sodom on the Gomorrah. I have contacts in Hollywood. They are friends of mine.
 
From what I have seen, there is no such thing as compromise. Those who are liberal think they are right. Those who are conservative think they are right. Those in the middle, believe they are being bullied by the left and the right.
When the question comes down to serious differences between right and wrong–rather than differences over what best encourages the right and discourages the wrong–this is probably predictable, don’t you think?
The trouble is though that many Christians say they are Christians, but do not behave like Christians. For example, we have a man in the White House who dated porn stats. Yet, because he, now, stands against abortion, many Christians just kind of look the other way. There are children being imprisoned along the US-Mexico border. This is not a Christian-way of dealing people.
That view has no basis.
It is hard to argue that we do not have a lot of room for improving how we (as a world, not just as a nation) deal with immigrants flooding out of home countries in which life has become extremely difficult if not an imminent threat to life.
The US bishops have made this point very forcefully.
There are children being imprisoned along the US-Mexico border. This is not a Christian-way of dealing people.
You have no facts.
The conditions in which children are detained and the support services that are available to them are of great concern to pediatricians and other advocates for children. In accordance with internationally accepted rights of the child, immigrant and refugee children should be treated with dignity and respect and should not be exposed to conditions that may harm or traumatize them. The Department of Homeland Security facilities do not meet the basic standards for the care of children in residential settings.
Policy Statement

 
Last edited:
The Far Left has nothing better to do than to adopt causes and declare themselves “champions of the oppressed.” Their motives are not legitimate. They use others to get glory and praise for themselves. You should understand that. Doing something without personal gain is foreign to them.
 
The man in the White House represents himself only.
I disagree with this statement. The President of the US represents all of America especially to other nations. I realize that is a utopian type statement but his job as President is to be the Chief representative of American values and ideals. This is why he is such a problem for so many people on the right and left and many religious leaders as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top