Is eternal suffering pointless?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael19682
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That really is the central question. I see no good reason either for the innocent to die and suffer. Yet I have been personally changed by all this and am questioning. It was a thread in moral theology that raised these issue for me. Other than that, I do feel viscerally that innocent means innocent and that the unbaptized infant is just that.
A real conundrum for me, tonyrey.
There’s no doubt in my mind that innocent does mean innocent and no one is punished for events over which they have no control. causa finita est!
 
If you believe that God’s love extends equally to everyone (rather than only to Christians or whoever), then God will try to reconcile everyone to Him, and eternal suffering would not only be pointless but counter-productive.
Not if we choose to be independent…
If you also believe that God’s love is omnipotent, then God will eventually succeed in reconciling everyone to Him (“love never fails” - 1 Cor 13) and no suffering could then be eternal.
Might is not right! Love is not love when it fails to respect freedom.
So a belief in eternal suffering requires belief either that in some cases God’s love will fail, or that God chooses to only love some and to not love others.
God fails only in the eyes of the world. He loves those who reject Him, has compassion for them and never fails to respect their freedom - without which we would all be incapable of love.
 
tonyrey;13316006:
I agree. There can be no such thing as a “forced repentance.” I agree that a happy ending for everyone, even those who absolutely hate everyone and God, is unlikely. That is why I believe God will annihilate some people, or just neglect to resurrect them.
God is the Creator not the Destroyer.
Next, you say that this means God is “diabolical.” Then, I say “certainly less diabolical than one who supports endless torment.” Then, you say "the torment probably isn’t that bad
, it entails “compensations.” Then, I say “no way, there is no evidence in any scripture or private revelation anywhere to support that assertion.” Then, you say “private revelations don’t matter, Jesus loved children, and sinners on earth seem to have fun, so why would the fun end in hell?” Then, I say “sinners aren’t actually having fun, they’re miserable. God can’t allow this to endure endlessly.” Then, you say…😛 :hypno: :yawn:

I am done with this conversation, I have to get back to work!!!

Hell is pointless. QED.You are fully entitled to your opinion, of course, but if we are reasonable we should admit we are not infallible and not entitled to state dogmatically: “Hell is pointless. QED.”
 
Good Morning, hasantas

Yes, I see that God does not order Muslims to kill infidels, but allows for some violence to happen. In Christianity, also, the Church doctrine allows for people to protect themselves and there is such thing as “just war”. In my opinion, though, most of the war that the Christian-dominated nations have done against Islam-dominated nations is unjust. First of all, since when does “protection” involve our nation (the U.S.) flying all the way around the world to attack a people on their own land? (Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, etc). Yes, we were “helping” other people, but peaceful means would have been more “Christian”. - Not that I want to get into that debate here. I am wondering if you agree with me though.
The verse of “kill” is not by all means. If someone suggest that God order Muslims to kill all infidels then God is not wrong but the man who misunderstood God’s order is wrong.

We all Muslims, Christians and Jews believe in same God. Muslims know that very well. But Christians have different thoughts about God and Muslims know that very well. So we have got not wrpng Gods but we have wrong thoughts about God.

Islam is religion of peace. Before Islam the wars always existed and Islam go on the most peaceful way even in wars. Islam order Muslims to never oppress and follow on peace. It is very obvious in verses.
This is completely off thread but I was interested in both of your comments. I just wanted to add something which I think is important. Although the religion of most of the soldiers involved in US/western military going to war are Christian, they are not going to the war in the name of Jesus or Christianity. They do not shout “Jesus is Great” when shooting at the enemy.

However, when Muslims go to war particularly in recent decades, they are mainly going to war in the name of Allah (God). I include violent acts by the many Islamic terrorist groups or individuals as going to war. I also include planning of these Islamic terror acts as going to war. Unlike “Jesus is Great”, we are all familiar with “Allahu Akbar” (God is Great). Hasantas, it would be fair to say that Muslims have a virtual if not total monopoly on religious inspired violence. Do you agree? Further to this, could you please give me your thoughts on Sharia Law? I am not being disrespectful or confrontational; I just wanted to know your thoughts on the above questions because you are obviously a devout follower of Islam.
 
Animal and human sacrifices are paganism. Throughout the Old Testament, God wants animal sacrifices to remove sins. He even gave the Israelites dozens of commandments telling them in great detail what animals he wanted them to kill for him and how he wanted them killed and burned for “a sweet savour unto the Lord.” In the end animal sacrifices weren’t enough to remove our sins so God needed a human sacrifice. This is vile paganism.
God never needs human sacrifice. Jesus chose to suffer and die for us to liberate us from the power of evil. He quoted Hosea:
For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings.
Jesus died because He was a problem to the Jews and the Romans. He would still be a problem today if He was to return as a man. Jesus came to preach a message of love, peace, mercy and forgiveness to all mankind. I have hopes that at some stage in the future mankind will realise this message of Jesus. In the Gospels, Pontius Pilate looks like a Christian. Nothing could be further from the truth. He was a Roman governor and wouldn’t have “batted an eye” in passing the sentence of crucifixion on Jesus. The massive amount of antisemitism in the World throughout history is down to us (mainly Christians including Catholics) blaming the Jews for killing Jesus.
It is certainly not the Church’s teaching that the Jews were responsible.
Symbolic or real, I reject the account of creation in Genesis and with it; original sin. It is a myth. I recognise that Judaism was the first monotheistic religion having started about 3,500 years ago. Personally, I believe all humans are God’s children and therefore we are equal and not specifically chosen. Does it really matter where Jesus came from? If it does really matter that He had to come from a certain tribe in Judah then I’ll accept it but for me it doesn’t matter.
The real question is whether you accept His teaching…
**I was wrong and I take back what I said previously. ** The personal revelation happened in 2004 after returning to the Catholic faith after an absence of over 30 years. My belief in Jesus as the Son of God is based in part on my personal revelation but mainly on a mixture of the New Testament scriptures, Church teaching, theological books and secular historical books.
Your quote is incorrect. If you go back and read my post again you will see I wrote: **“The Gospel writers **portray Jesus as a biblically literate 1st century Jewish male who was steeped in the scripture and the culture – he was localized in a time and place”. It was the gospel writers and not Jesus. When you read the Gospels, you can see that this is true.
I make no secret of the fact that I am a Christian Universalist on the matter of hell. I believe there have been mistranslations of the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. Even if there are no mistranslations or misinterpretation of what Jesus said on hell, I still could not agree with hell. At that stage, I would cease to call myself a Christian and would likely join Judaism - if they would have me.
In your mind and other people who believe that Jesus died for our sins to put us right with God, it means that God is acting like a pagan god.
“A fair number of modern-day scholars, too, find the satisfaction theology bothersome because of the way it images God. What kind of loving God, they argue, would demand such horrific suffering from his own Son in order to secure divine justice?
What seems to me a reasonable explanation is this: God decided to send Jesus to live among us, to be fully human so that he could teach us and show us the ways of the Lord. Once he became human, death was inevitable; and because his teaching challenged both the religious and secular authorities of his day, a violent death was likely”.
Father Kenneth Doyle

Then how do you explain the blood-stained history of mankind and the lust for power at all costs?
What point(s) does eternal suffering have?
The fact that we are not God’s slaves and can choose to pay the price of independence for as long as we choose…
No, it shows I’m using plain commonsense that God gifted all of us with. No country in the developed World uses torture as a normal practice of law. However, we are expected to believe that a divine being with incredible attributes far beyond what us humans can ever imagine of love, mercy, forgiveness and justice sanctions torture 24/7 for an eternity. There is obviously a massive disconnect there no matter how we cut and dice it.
By the way, I see that you have not commented on the quote I gave from Numbers concerning Moses.
The writers of the Old Testament were not infallible.
 
But who sent them there to be with the demons? They would not have gone to hell unless someone put them there.
By an act of their own will, like the act of the demons will, to be apart from their Maker. Freedom means choosing. Choosing acting. Acting remittance.
 
Is the human will powerful enough to reject Gods attempt at reconciliation? I believe it is.
Eternity is a long time. Any human with a will powerful enough to reject God’s love after the first thirty trillion years have gone by, and then after the second thirty billion trillion years, and then the third billion trillion gazillion years, should imho get a free upgrade.
 
Eternity is a long time. Any human with a will powerful enough to reject God’s love after the first thirty trillion years have gone by, and then after the second thirty billion trillion years, and then the third billion trillion gazillion years, should imho get a free upgrade.
Why do think there are years going by in eternity?
 
inocente;13324506:
If you believe that God’s love extends equally to everyone (rather than only to Christians or whoever), then God will try to reconcile everyone to Him, and eternal suffering would not only be pointless but counter-productive.
Not if we choose to be independent…
Unconditional love doesn’t depend on our choices or any other conditions.
inocente;13324506:
If you also believe that God’s love is omnipotent, then God will eventually succeed in reconciling everyone to Him (“love never fails” - 1 Cor 13) and no suffering could then be eternal.
Might is not right! Love is not love when it fails to respect freedom.

God fails only in the eyes of the world. He loves those who reject Him, has compassion for them and never fails to respect their freedom - without which we would all be incapable of love.
If God’s love ultimately fails to win some over, then God will know He is not omnipotent, He will know that his love is less powerful than human obstinacy. Even after an eternity has passed by, God would look at them and know His love has failed, know there is a more powerful force than His everlasting love.

(I’m not arguing, just pointing out the logical consequence of your statement).
 
Why do think there are years going by in eternity?
If you take eternity to be an absence of time, there can be no suffering since there is no time in which to sense or think or feel anything. But then I can’t see how your “Is the human will powerful enough to reject Gods attempt at reconciliation? I believe it is.” could possibly work, since without time passing there’s no time for God to attempt reconciliation, or for the human to reject it.
 
PumpkinCookie;13318929:
God is the Creator not the Destroyer.

You are fully entitled to your opinion, of course, but if we are reasonable we should admit we are not infallible and not entitled to state dogmatically: “Hell is pointless. QED.”
You know what, you are right. I want to amend my conclusion, because “QED” is impossible in this instance. I believe it is impossible to exhaustively prove with certainty that Christian or Islamic hell is absolutely pointless. Here is the amended version:

There is apparently no good reason to suppose that eternal hell has a point.

If endless hell is an article of faith for you, then I guess you could say “only God knows the point of hell” or something like that.
 
If you take eternity to be an absence of time, there can be no suffering since there is no time in which to sense or think or feel anything.
Why are any of these things dependent on time?
But then I can’t see how your “Is the human will powerful enough to reject Gods attempt at reconciliation? I believe it is.” could possibly work, since without time passing there’s no time for God to attempt reconciliation, or for the human to reject it.
Why do you think I implied that reconciliation is possibly after this life? “now is the acceptable time.”
1.[2] For he says, “At the acceptable time I have listened to you, and helped you on the day of salvation.” Behold, now is the acceptable time; behold, now is the day of salvation. 2Cor.6
 
Eternity is a long time. Any human with a will powerful enough to reject God’s love after the first thirty trillion years have gone by, and then after the second thirty billion trillion years, and then the third billion trillion gazillion years, should imho get a free upgrade.
If their eye is dark then they are dark within and will not see the upgrade…
 
Very good, I appreciate you. That is a good self-critism. Indeed there some Muslims too who may persecute others and they claim to do that in name of religion.
Yes,
We need to hear more of your voice, instead of their voice.
Yes, Jesus taught to behave in good manner and also all messengers from God did same thing. But there are no any judgement for people who kill you or expel you from your country. Do God allow someone to expel or kill other? İsn’t that unjustice? Ofcourse we must behave people in good way and forgive them. This is recommendation and order of God.
👍 The way I see God, also, is that He sees that whenever we kill or expel, we do so out of blindness and ignorance. I, too, can be blind and ignorant.
34-And not equal are the good deed and the bad. Repel [evil] by that [deed] which is better; and thereupon the one whom between you and him is enmity [will become] as though he was a devoted friend. Fussilat(41)
39-And those who, when tyranny strikes them, they defend themselves,
40- And the retribution for an evil act is an evil one like it, but whoever pardons and makes reconciliation – his reward is [due] from Allah. Indeed, He does not like wrongdoers.
41-And whoever avenges himself after having been wronged – those have not upon them any cause [for blame].
42-The cause is only against the ones who wrong the people and tyrannize upon the earth without right. Those will have a painful punishment.
43-And whoever is patient and forgives – indeed, that is of the matters [requiring] determination. As-Shura(42)
There is a possible contradiction between v.40 and v.41, but I think what is said that when a person avenges himself, God still forgives him. I agree with this.
And there are many Hadiths about forgiving and loving people but I cannot find them in English and my English is poor. For loving enemy! Muslim take pity on enemy because they got sins. I think with “enemy” Jesus means who do not understand believers and behave believers in bad way. Jesus did encounter many evil conditions but He always forgived people.
Islam allow and advise Muslims in three way against evil:
  1. Retaliation
  2. Forgiving
  3. Respond in better way
All these are good and justice but Islam advise to forgive or do better.
So, the difference is that Jesus does not advise #1. He says to forgive. (remember the “eye for an eye” section) As you know, though, Christians can be very retaliatory also. Ghandi said, “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth, and the whole world ends up blind and toothless” or something like that. I can’t verify that quote, but I think you get the idea.

Would you agree that #2 and #3 are better than #1? I do agree that self-protection is very necessary, but #2 an #3 are more in the ways of peace, right? Perhaps we need an example.
And also look at: These are God’s comment about treat evils!
16 But of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the Lord thy God hath commanded thee: Deuteronomy(20)
9 Then said he unto me, The iniquity of the house of Israel and Judah is exceeding great, and the land is full of blood, and the city full of perverseness: for they say, The Lord hath forsaken the earth, and the Lord seeth not.
10 And as for me also, mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity, but I will recompense their way upon their head.
11 And, behold, the man clothed with linen, which had the inkhorn by his side, reported the matter, saying, I have done as thou hast commanded me. Ezekiel(9)
Is not God of OT and NT same? But we could interprete OT in peaceful way, don’t we?
The way I look at it, people of the OT in those cases saw that their actions were needed because otherwise they would continue to suffer poverty or weakness. They certainly had to believe that God approved of their violence. Those times are gone, though, those times disappeared when the world became a smaller place, and there are more ways to solve conflict. Why can’t all those factions in Syria just forgive, get together, and talk? But no, they do not think of forgiving.

God “commands us” in our genetics. We have the will to survive. I think you agree, though, that we can all live as one.
And we do not have to demonstrate that our religion is better. Our religions are from God so they are equal. But we see some facts and good thing in our religion and think that others are evil but that is not true.
👍

continued…
 
If you take eternity to be an absence of time, there can be no suffering since there is no time in which to sense or think or feel anything. But then I can’t see how your “Is the human will powerful enough to reject Gods attempt at reconciliation? I believe it is.” could possibly work, since without time passing there’s no time for God to attempt reconciliation, or for the human to reject it.
An eternity without time is not static. It would be akin to your dreams which are not happening in time. In eternity events happen without the restriction of time or distance.
The angels commuting between eternity and earth otherwise would cause severe delays.
 
Do you ask why do not God forgive infidels?

Firstly God has(is) infinite love. Yes that is very true. But also God has infinite power, infinite justice, infinite wisdom, infinite life, infinite hearing, infinite mercy, infinite majesty etc. So if we just say God is infinite love then there should be some problems. For instance why do God allow infidels and persecutors to go in Hell. We cannot explain that only by love. But we can understand with infinite justice and majesty. God will punish persecutors because they had transgressed other’s rights. And a state punish criminals because the state has some laws and majesty. So do God. For example a king is very merciful in family. But he is very hard in war while command his army. And he is very justice while judge people. King send some people to prison because they had did evils. If we think king to behave in every cases as in family then that would not be use.
So, again there may be one possible difference. In Christianity, God calls us not to punish, but forgive from the heart. This is not to be confused with protecting society from murderers or creating laws to discourage people from doing evil. We can still forgive as we do all of these things. We are called to forgive and let go of our negative feelings toward one another, to understand one another. Even in war, we can forgive the enemy. In fact, I had a very interesting conversation with an American soldier the other day. When we are angry, we do not have a “cool head” and make terrible mistakes in battle. He said that they were encouraged by their commanders to see the enemy as people with families just as they have. The ultimate “seeing” is through the eyes of forgiveness. I’m not sure many soldiers are able to maintain such forgiveness…

So, yes, God’s justice is infinite, but then we go back to the question: Does any person knowingly and willingly reject God? In my observations, the answer is no. People who reject God do not know what they are doing, they do not understand, they may be blind with anger (as are some atheists). So, does our Just God see their lack of awareness and forgive?
We cannot forgive people who transgressed other’s rights. Because if we forgive persecutors that is unjustice and unfair for persecuteds.
This is a very, very common statement made by Christians, Muslims, and Jews, and even the non-religious.

Jesus said:

New International Version
And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive them, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins."
Mark 11:25

So forgiveness is really between a person and their God. Here is what I have to say to people, as I forgive Stalin or Hitler, for example:

“If you resent my forgiveness of Stalin, please forgive me. I would not have found the need to forgive Stalin if I did not care deeply about his victims. I have no intention to disrespect your hurt, anger or make a claim that I am speaking for you. My forgiveness is not meant to condone what he did. My forgiveness is what I must do in order to let go of my anger and hatred, to end a grudge, to make things right between me and God.”
Every element, atoms show God. Every thing is an evidence for exist of God. So we can count countless matters in that way. An infidels rejects all these witnesses. That reach an ifinite crime.
God has infinite attributes and infidels reject those. That is the killing as moraly. And infidels behave in that way for all life.
Yes, we both see this evidence, but infidels reject. However, they reject because they do not understand, they do not know what they are doing. Can you think of an example of any person knowingly and willingly rejecting God? Try to be specific, and we can investigate.
People has many feelings and emotions. And people has very weak disposition. God do not restrain motions. Some people use their free will in good way but some people lose. God want to examine people.
But we can ask that question:Why did/do not God send all people in Heavens? My anwer is the “Allah know the best”.
👍 And the Church has never claimed that any person is in hell, though it is expressed as a possibility. Yes, Allah knows best.🙂

Thank you, hasantas, you are a very thoughtful person with whom to have this discussion.
 
Every element, atoms show God. Every thing is an evidence for exist of God. So we can count countless matters in that way. An infidels rejects all these witnesses. That reach an ifinite crime.

God has infinite attributes and infidels reject those. That is the killing as moraly. And infidels behave in that way for all life.
Not sure I’m comfortable with that sentence…
Are you saying that atheists should be killed, because they behave in an immoral way towards god? Or am I reading it wrong?
 
tonyrey;13326606:
You know what, you are right. I want to amend my conclusion, because “QED” is impossible in this instance. I believe it is impossible to exhaustively prove with certainty that Christian or Islamic hell is absolutely pointless.
I admire your honesty! 🙂
Here is the amended version:
There is apparently no good reason to suppose that eternal hell has a point.
If endless hell is an article of faith for you, then I guess you could say “only God knows the point of hell” or something like that.
I would modify that by saying:

There is a very good reason to believe eternal hell has a point because even in this world there are people who prefer to suffer if they can live for themselves rather than make sacrifices for others who need their help. Selfishness is a deep-rooted weakness that is hard to resist and control. It is all the more sinister because it can easily develop into a systematic policy of exploiting others in order to obtain wealth and power. As Kant pointed out, other people become means to an end rather than ends in themselves. Yet selfishness incurs its own punishment because it inevitably leads to isolation, frustration and loneliness. Power is useless if it is restricted to ourself without any effect on others: it is then that we become our own worst enemy without any possibility of escape from ourselves - unless we regret what we have done or failed to do and wish to make amends. Then there is hope because we become liberated from ourselves by love for others and are no longer slaves but enjoy the glorious freedom of our Father in heaven…
 
Not sure I’m comfortable with that sentence…
Are you saying that atheists should be killed, because they behave in an immoral way towards god? Or am I reading it wrong?
It is because of poor English.

For instance when some kill other the punishment could be life imprisonment. And act of killing may take one or two minutes. Human’s mean life is 60 or 70 years. The punisment of act of killing mankind may be life imprisonment. And rejecting God mean to kill eternal essence and attributes of God as morally. The punisment(imprisonment) of killing of human maybe as much human’s life time. So killing God’s(ofcourse as morally) may be punisment (imprisonment) of Hell forever. So everlasting Hell imprisonment can reconcile with our justice on the world to understand God’s infiniite justice. Otherwise I do not mean to kill any one. Killing is the one of the major crime and sin which could cause to send killer to Hell. We have not right to kill others. But we have to advise each other to do good deeds. My advise for atheist is to not be so courageous and adventurous to reject God. They do not gain anything by rejecting. If they accept God that would be first step to approach God. They have not to do anything and just they will say that we recognise God existence.

If someone do not reject God so there should be a way of salvation for him. The conscience desire and wants eternity. Nobody wish to be destroyed forever and death is not being destroyed forever but is changing the worlds. Soul take out of this world and take into other world by death.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top