Level is relevant.
What’s the difference between the state of grace that one in purgatory has and the one in heaven has?
If both have the SAME AMOUNT OF GRACE, as you are claiming, then we have God treating people different for having the same state of grace.
Two people do the same thing, one gets punished with purgatory, one gets rewarded with heaven. How is that just?
Level is most definitely relevant. If it is irrelevant as you claim, purgatory should not exist.
The only difference between the ones in heaven and the ones in purgatory is level or amount of grace that they have. Or did you forget the parable of the 3 servants?
They all had different levels of grace as well.
It is obvious those in purgatory have a lower level or amount of grace than those in heaven, otherwise God is punishing people for an unjust reason.
I’m not questioning whether both have the state of grace, what I’m questioning is if they have the SAME LEVEL or AMOUNT of grace. If they have the same amount or level of grace and they get two different outcomes, they are treated unjustly.
It is impossible to get rid of all temporal punishment while in this jail cell.
Actually all imperfections cause people to sin, and that is known as “attachment to sin” in your definition, and those warrant temporal punishments per your statements. As a result, imperfections ARE sins.
God creates people imperfect and thus people don’t have a choice but to suffer punishment.
A freshly baptized person still has concupiscence and is held temporally responsible for the sins of their ancestors. So it does not get rid of ALL temporal punishments.
The Church does not call the consequences of original sin temporal punishments due sin, rather that term is used for actual sins.
Sin is certainly imperfect behavior, however all imperfections are not sinful. Actual sin requires an act of will.
I do not post about amount of grace, except that it is irrelevant, since the Catholic Church teaches that the presence of temporal punishment is what determines if the just (those departed with the state of sanctifying grace) need purgatory or not.
Q. You ask “Two people do the same thing, one gets punished with purgatory, one gets rewarded with heaven. How is that just?”
A. If the two are both repent and are forgiven the guilt, there still may remain temporal punishment. The acts of penance for sin eliminate the temporal punishment. So the difference between two in this example, is that one did incomplete penance and the other did complete penance.
See the Catholic Encyclopedia:
Temporal punishment
That temporal punishment is due to sin, even after the sin itself has been pardoned by God, is clearly the teaching of Scripture. God indeed brought man out of his first disobedience and gave him power to govern all things (Wisdom 10:2), but still condemned him “to eat his bread in the sweat of his brow” until he returned unto dust. God forgave the incredulity of Moses and Aaron, but in punishment kept them from the “land of promise” (Numbers 20:12). The Lord took away the sin of David, but the life of the child was forfeited because David had made God’s enemies blaspheme His Holy Name (2 Samuel 12:13-14). In the New Testament as well as in the Old, almsgiving and fasting, and in general penitential acts are the real fruits of repentance (Matthew 3:8; Luke 17:3; 3:3). The whole penitential system of the Church testifies that the voluntary assumption of penitential works has always been part of true repentance and the Council of Trent (Sess. XIV, can. xi) reminds the faithful that God does not always remit the whole punishment due to sin together with the guilt. God requires satisfaction, and will punish sin, and this doctrine involves as its necessary consequence a belief that the sinner failing to do penance in this life may be punished in another world, and so not be cast off eternally from God.
Hanna, E. (1911). Purgatory. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
newadvent.org/cathen/12575a.htm
Attachments
We are obliged for absolution of mortal sin to avoid the near occasions of sin. We may be attracted to those occasions due to our attachment to the pleasure of our sins, even though we are sorry for them and intend not to repeat them. We are not under the same obligation for venial sins as we are for mortal sins.
Baltimore Catechism
Q. 782. What should one do who has only venial sins to confess?
A. One who has only venial sins to confess should tell also some sin already confessed in his past life for which he knows he is truly sorry; because it is not easy to be truly sorry for slight sins and imperfections, and yet we must be sorry for the sins confessed that our confession may be valid – hence we add some past sin for which we are truly sorry to those for which we may not be sufficiently sorry.