P
pnewton
Guest
No one has said that here. I do not believe I have ever heard this position.. Some want none. It is the none I was referring to.
No one has said that here. I do not believe I have ever heard this position.. Some want none. It is the none I was referring to.
You would hold a ten year old for a crime his parents commit? Does that apply to all children or just Mexicans?He crossed the border illegally. He has no legal right to be here. boom. real argument.
Plenty of children pay a price for their parents mistakes, sadly. What about children of convicts? Should we just let them all be free?Maximilian75:![]()
You would hold a ten year old for a crime his parents commit? Does that apply to all children or just Mexicans?He crossed the border illegally. He has no legal right to be here. boom. real argument.
No, we should jail them. Make them part of their parents prison time, at least to be consistent.Plenty of children pay a price for their parents mistakes, sadly. What about children of convicts? Should we just let them all be free?
I was addressing this for those who put their Catholicism over their nationalism. If people who are the shepherds, who teach us the faith, who have given their life to serve God in this world, have a different position, surely that should at least give us pause as to what is morally right in this situation.The priest has a different set of priorities than the United States government.
Loud-living-dogma:![]()
No, we should jail them. Make them part of their parents prison time, at least to be consistent.Plenty of children pay a price for their parents mistakes, sadly. What about children of convicts? Should we just let them all be free?
I call bull puckey. You can call for strong immigration laws and still be a good Catholic. You’re not the judge and jury or pope, either, pnewton.JanSobieskiIII:![]()
I was addressing this for those who put their Catholicism over their nationalism.The priest has a different set of priorities than the United States government.
They may have discussed it, but there was no knowing how long that might take, if ever. It is unreasonable to punish Jorge for marrying just because others might have chosen differently. By the time this happened, he was already heavily invested in his life here - and not by his own choice.You think Jorge and his wife ever discussed, "maybe we should get your immigration regularized before we get married? "
Same thing. It would have been a big disruption even then. They had options along the way.“Maybe we should consider legally settling in Mexico?”
Jorge’s parents bear some of that responsibility for putting him in that position.It was THEIR responsibility to figure these things out.
Deflection. I’m not going there.Any time a parent is sent to prison, do you consider that “breaking up a family”?
I guess no one should ever be sent to prison, because that would be “breaking up a family”, wouldn’t it?
Call it what you want. Depending on what you define as strong immigration laws, no you can’t, lest you be a cafeteria Catholic, rejecting a large portion of the Catholic doctrine of social justice. One can believe in strong immigration laws only to the extent it is consistent with moral teaching. That is why I suggested going and asking a priest if they believe this incident is consistent. Or one could just open one’s heart and listen to the Pope.I call bull puckey. You can call for strong immigration laws and still be a good Catholic.
Except Catholic teaching also says that government has to oversee the common good, and letting in huge influxes of poor folks directly negatively effects the working poor citizens by creating an abundance of labor which suppresses wagesFor example, the idea of preference for the wealthy, professional or skilled to immigrate over the poor is a direct contradiction of Catholic teaching on the preferential option for the poor.
For Goodness’ sakes. The man has a family and was brought here when he was ten years old. He has no record of crime. Not even a traffic ticket.It’s not like people are not aware of the immigration laws of the USA. And, furthermore there are legal ways to normalize their situation, if they choose to abandon México and move to the USA. If they don’t meet the requirements a government imposes, what is there to say?
“That was easy!”Deflection. I’m not going there.Any time a parent is sent to prison, do you consider that “breaking up a family”?
I guess no one should ever be sent to prison, because that would be “breaking up a family”, wouldn’t it?
No one is separating him from his family!“Law is the Law”
Aight, folks. I guess we gotta let the abortion law stand since, well, law is law.
Let’s be consistent here and defend all life. If you were brought to another country at age 10, and since had a family with no criminal record, would you think it just to be separated from your family?
Plenty here arguing for the sake of their political party’s allegiance and not their faith. Sad.