Kamala Harris Supports ‘Some Type of’ Slavery Reparations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The paradigm is in the article.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) said in an interview Monday she supports “some type of” reparations to black Americans for slavery. . . .

. . . Charlamagne asked again, “So you are for some type of reparations?”

“Yes I am, yes I am,” Harris responded.

Harris announced her 2020 campaign in January . . .
 
Last edited:
dvdjs . . .
What has the Senator proposed?
I am not telling you.

As has been said here . . .

You really shouldn’t expect others to dance to your tune.

For others observe the window into how she thinks and plans on governing.
 
Last edited:
You really shouldn’t expect others to dance to your tune.
But this is your tune; you are making the claims. I am just trying to understand the words of your tune.
I am not telling you.
Fine. I will give a hint:
Part of my initiative again around the ‘Lift Act’ is that same point–you lifting people up who are making less than a hundred thousand dollars a year. What I want to do about rent is the same thing. What we need to do around education and understanding disparities …
You might look up the “Lift Act” if you want to know how she thinks and plans on governing.
 
Last edited:
dvdjs . . .
You might look up the “Lift Act” . . .
No.

You go ahead and begin a thread on it if you want.
 
Last edited:
Fine give me reparations then. My ancestors came 40 years after slavery ended and the first two generations worked in Northeast Pennsylvania coal mines. The males worked 6 days a week 12 hours a day for dirt pay and no benefits in horrible working conditions. Most of them ended up dying from black lung and were lucky to see their 60th birthday, that’s if they saw their 50th, and many died much younger from injuries suffered on the job. My ancestors had nothing to do with anyone’s oppression and were opressed themselves. I owe nobody anything.
 
Last edited:
dvdjs . . .
It is perfectly germane to this thread.
I’m not saying it is or is not germane.

This was part of the same radio interview too . . .



.

. . . but I am not going to focus on THAT marijuana memory “issue” for Senator Harris (here) either.

I’m saying I am going to focus on the
"reparations based upon color of skin" issue
and not get sidetracked on deflections you seem to be attempting to introduce.

.

Do YOU think it is appropriate to tax an innocent person MORE based upon the color of their skin dvdjs?
 
Last edited:
To be fair, reparations can mean something very broad, it doesn’t necessarily mean direct restitution based for one specific group of people but perhaps rather instead creating and developing policy initiatives and program ideas to help resolve societal issues and systemic problems which have a basis in history like slavery, segregation and other issues that disproportionately impacted factions of society. For example, developing programs to help uplift disadvantaged and struggling communities who have been dealt with a difficult hand of cards. For example, take this quote from the previous President Obama.
“I have said in the past – and I’ll repeat again – that the best reparations we can provide are good schools in the inner city and jobs for people who are unemployed,”
 
Last edited:
My ancestors were Irish potato farmers who were very definitely oppressed by the English back in the day. They killed 1 million of us during the Famine years and forced 3 million more to leave the country over the remainder of the 19th century. Ireland’s population has still not returned to pre-Famine levels even today. Tony Blair made a formal apology on behalf of the British, but reparations were never on the table. We all moved on.

Now if we want to talk about white privilege and about other options for helping black people, we’ve been having those conversations ever since the passage of the Civil Rights Act. It would be good to ask what has worked … and more frankly, what has not worked.
 
RCIAGraduate . . . .
For example, developing programs to help uplift disadvantaged and struggling communities who have been dealt with a difficult hand of cards.
Should we base this upon the color of their skin RCIAGraduate?

And is it OK to remove from consideration benefits for others based upon the color of their skin too?
 
Last edited:
There’s plenty of broad programs already. So if that’s what you mean by reparations there have been reparations for a long time and continue today. We can even go back to the civil war with all the death and destruction that ended slavery. In a broad sense that is also reparations.
 
Last edited:
Should we base this upon the color of their skin RCIAGraduate?
Not necessarily (but kinda); rhetorically, couldn’t policies be amended and programs enacted to help communities and folks who are disadvantaged and struggling? Like hypothetically, the Congress with the collaboration of the President and the Executive Branch could implement a set of policies and programs to address and amend systemic issues that contributed to communities to become disadvantaged and struggling. Forgive me for sounding quite vague about it.
 
Last edited:
RCIAGraduate . . .
Not necessarily (but kinda); rhetorically, couldn’t policies be amended and programs enacted to help communities and folks who are disadvantaged and struggling?
Look. I’ve seen your posts and you have an admirable heart RCIAGraduate,
so don’t think I am applying what I am about to say to you.

But white supremacists could come up with the same type of arguing some day.

They COULD argue
we need to use the gun-point power of Government to take wealth from blacks
(or whatever other group)
and give it to whites.

(That is part of what slavery was.)

I know you don’t think that would be OK RCIAGraduate.

But what floors me, is the statists support this idea IN PRINCIPLE (just rearranging skin colors).

And it is WRONG and racist.

There have been many other clues to their racism and self-loathing as well (putting up killing or abortion clinics in minority neighborhoods, double-standards on posting photos in their newspapers based upon race, projection of their own racism on others, especially people like President Trump, etc. etc.).
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 25, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – A contractor building Planned Parenthood’s new abortion facility in Washington, D.C., told a group of pro-life protesters “I like” the Ku Klux Klan… . .

. . . When asked if he would install the plumbing for “extermination camps,” he replied, “Sure I would.”

“Why not?” he asked. . .

. . . Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger spoke to the women’s chapter of the KKK in May 1926, saying that “to me any aroused group was a good group.” She recalled that she so impressed the audience that “a dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.”

Sanger also launched the “Negro Project,” hiring black preachers to convince their congregations to take birth control or get sterilized, as a means of culling the world of those she considered “unfit.”

Blacks are disproportionately affected by abortion. While 13.3 percent of the U.S. population is black, “non-Hispanic black women” accounted for more than one-third (36.7 percent) of all abortions in 2012, the most recent year for which data are available, according to the CDC’s abortion surveillance. The number rose to more than four-out-of-ten if black Hispanics were included. . . .


.

Forcibly taking money from innocent people and giving it to Government (yes Government would get a “share”) and to other people based upon the color of their skin. . . is . . . . evil.
 
Last edited:
40.png
JonNC:
Nope. A “D”.
Ohhh … shifting the goals posts. :roll_eyes:
Nope. Whether it is Woodrow Wilson and Margaret Sanger to Fulbright and Wallace and their racism, FDR and his anti-Japanese bigotry, or anti -white male bigotry during the Kavanaugh hearings, or the regrowth of any-Semitism already being expressed in the new Congress, bigotry is the legacy of the Democrat Party.
There is clearly bigotry among others and not all Democrats were or are, but it is the continuing legacy of the Democrat Party.
 
dvdjs . . .
Then why call for a new thread?
.

What I also called for dvdjs is . . .
Do YOU think it is appropriate to tax an innocent person MORE based upon the color of their skin dvdjs?
And so far, I haven’t gotten an answer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top