D
dvdjs
Guest
She did? That is not in the article.Today Kamala Harris brings institutionalized racism to her election platform FAVORING this type of discrimination based upon the color of a person’s skin!
She did? That is not in the article.Today Kamala Harris brings institutionalized racism to her election platform FAVORING this type of discrimination based upon the color of a person’s skin!
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) said in an interview Monday she supports “some type of” reparations to black Americans for slavery. . . .
. . . Charlamagne asked again, “So you are for some type of reparations?”
“Yes I am, yes I am,” Harris responded.
Harris announced her 2020 campaign in January . . .
What has the Senator proposed?The paradigm is in the article.
I am not telling you.What has the Senator proposed?
But this is your tune; you are making the claims. I am just trying to understand the words of your tune.You really shouldn’t expect others to dance to your tune.
Fine. I will give a hint:I am not telling you.
You might look up the “Lift Act” if you want to know how she thinks and plans on governing.Part of my initiative again around the ‘Lift Act’ is that same point–you lifting people up who are making less than a hundred thousand dollars a year. What I want to do about rent is the same thing. What we need to do around education and understanding disparities …
No.You might look up the “Lift Act” . . .
That quote is in the OP. It is perfectly germane to this thread.You go ahead and begin a thread on it if you want.
I’m not saying it is or is not germane.It is perfectly germane to this thread.
“I have said in the past – and I’ll repeat again – that the best reparations we can provide are good schools in the inner city and jobs for people who are unemployed,”
Should we base this upon the color of their skin RCIAGraduate?For example, developing programs to help uplift disadvantaged and struggling communities who have been dealt with a difficult hand of cards.
Not necessarily (but kinda); rhetorically, couldn’t policies be amended and programs enacted to help communities and folks who are disadvantaged and struggling? Like hypothetically, the Congress with the collaboration of the President and the Executive Branch could implement a set of policies and programs to address and amend systemic issues that contributed to communities to become disadvantaged and struggling. Forgive me for sounding quite vague about it.Should we base this upon the color of their skin RCIAGraduate?
Look. I’ve seen your posts and you have an admirable heart RCIAGraduate,Not necessarily (but kinda); rhetorically, couldn’t policies be amended and programs enacted to help communities and folks who are disadvantaged and struggling?
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 25, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – A contractor building Planned Parenthood’s new abortion facility in Washington, D.C., told a group of pro-life protesters “I like” the Ku Klux Klan… . .
. . . When asked if he would install the plumbing for “extermination camps,” he replied, “Sure I would.”
“Why not?” he asked. . .
. . . Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger spoke to the women’s chapter of the KKK in May 1926, saying that “to me any aroused group was a good group.” She recalled that she so impressed the audience that “a dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered.”
Sanger also launched the “Negro Project,” hiring black preachers to convince their congregations to take birth control or get sterilized, as a means of culling the world of those she considered “unfit.”
Blacks are disproportionately affected by abortion. While 13.3 percent of the U.S. population is black, “non-Hispanic black women” accounted for more than one-third (36.7 percent) of all abortions in 2012, the most recent year for which data are available, according to the CDC’s abortion surveillance. The number rose to more than four-out-of-ten if black Hispanics were included. . . .
Nope. Whether it is Woodrow Wilson and Margaret Sanger to Fulbright and Wallace and their racism, FDR and his anti-Japanese bigotry, or anti -white male bigotry during the Kavanaugh hearings, or the regrowth of any-Semitism already being expressed in the new Congress, bigotry is the legacy of the Democrat Party.
Then why call for a new thread?I’m not saying it is or is not germane.
You are talking about dead people.Nope. Whether it is …
The bigots who criticized “old white men” on the Senate committeee are alive today.Cathoholic:![]()
Then why call for a new thread?I’m not saying it is or is not germane.
You are talking about dead people.Nope. Whether it is …![]()
.Then why call for a new thread?
And so far, I haven’t gotten an answer.Do YOU think it is appropriate to tax an innocent person MORE based upon the color of their skin dvdjs?
dvdjs . . .
I doubt dvdjs would support this, but as far as the identity politics/ intersectionality progressives are concerned, just being white and male means you are at fault. You have enjoyed some privilege. It is racism, pure and simple.Then why call for a new thread?