Kamala Harris Supports ‘Some Type of’ Slavery Reparations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You’re not actually answering the question. HOW? How does a system of reparations not end up becoming a system of wealth redistribution based on skin color? Who decides who gets reparations? Who decides what form of reparations they get?
 
More importantly, who specifically is going to be levied with the taxes to pay these reparations?
 
You’re not actually answering the question. HOW?
There are many ways this could work without it becoming what you are speaking of.
But the senator has made no specific proposal that has the problems you are concerned about. It would seem that these concerns are off topic.
 
Last edited:
No I don’t think they are. She’s advocating for the use of my taxes to pay for reparations, I want to know how.
 
Harris is very “mixed up” in her thinking.
While this strategy may be appealing to a minority in the Dem party, I suspect it will also turn off many black voters who don’t want it to be a campaign issue. The issue also loses pull during a booming economy with low unemployment.

Thus it will pull in support during the primary (away from other Dems) but likely push many to the opposition in the General election.
 
Last edited:
dvdjs . . . .
Are you really trying to spin “some type of reparations” into “redistribution of wealth based on skin color”?
Why not just stick to what the Senator actually said?
No. It is YOU that is doing the “spinning”.

.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) said in an interview Monday she supports “some type of” reparations to black Americans for slavery. . . .​

. . . Charlamagne asked again, “So you are for some type of reparations?”

“Yes I am, yes I am,” Harris responded.
 
dvdjs . . .
What evidence do you have to support the idea . . .
It’s not going to work dvdjs.

I’m not going to give you any more evidence as I am not attempting to convince you of anything.

Other people can look at the data and draw their own conclusions.

I’ve told you before, you cannot have a rational discussion with someone who uses irrational argumentation.
 
LeafByNiggle . . .
Nor can you have a rational argument with someone who refuses to answer criticism of their argument.
And if you think that is the case here LeafByNiggle, you go ahead and think it.

As I said, I will let readers of the thread draw their own conclusions.

You have drawn YOUR conclusion and you are welcome to think that way.

You are welcome to think that
“reparations” to people
based upon the color of their skin (in this case “black Americans”)
involves NO taking of wealth
and involves
NOTHING based upon the color of a person’s skin.

Go ahead and keep telling yourself that.

I have no interest in trying to convince you otherwise here.
 
Last edited:
You are wrong and I did.

The claims that should not be made are yours, not mine.
 
Last edited:
dvdjs . . .
I am sorry, I did not see where you did. Can you please indicate the post number where you documented her desire for reparations based on skin color?
No I am not going to indicate it for you dvdjs.
 
40.png
JonNC:
I stopped reading left-leaning biased sources on the topic in school curricula and in the MSM.
I check out as many sources as I have the time with, especially if the topic is at all controversial. Six days a week I start out with Yahoo News that draws from a goodly divergence of sources.

Unfortunately, imo, all too many people only seek out sources that feed their “confirmation bias”. Therefore, your and my approach on this is almost entirely different.
You don’t know what my approach is, other than what I’ve said. What I’ve said is I’ve learned not to trust the MSM because they’ve proven themselves to be the “Pravda” for the DNC.
 
There is no evidence that Senator Harris advocates slavery reparations made on the basis of skin color. The claim should not be made unless you can document evidence of such advocacy.
Are you suggesting that I can ‘self identify’ and join the queue, with my hand out?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top