C
ConstantLearner
Guest
Because it’s textbook perfect. A lie is a statement contradictory to the truth.How is calling your interpretation bizarre a personal attack?
Because it’s textbook perfect. A lie is a statement contradictory to the truth.How is calling your interpretation bizarre a personal attack?
…Because it’s textbook perfect. A lie is a statement contradictory to the truth.
Kava wasn’t accused of sex crimes. Had Mrs. Clinton won the election on 8 November, he would have most likely been sitting on the court by Thanksgiving and he would not have been asked about notations in his high school yearbookI hardly think it would destroy his life! I think you’re being far too melodramatic. Was Merrick Garland’s life destroyed when the Senate sat on their hands and did nothing for almost a year? No
She, not he.And he STILL has not shown ANY contradiction! He just strongly believes.
I think you mean Kavanaugh, not Garland. Garland is working and was never accused of any sex crime or any crime, or lie, at all.Garland can’t go back to his job, the cloud over the him now, with litigants realizing he was denied the seat on the Supreme Court because the Senate determined he was a gang rapist. He will definitely have to work the rest of his days trying to rehabilitate himself…
And that’s the kind of person you want on the Supreme Court?Garland (Kavanaugh, actually) can’t go back to his job, the cloud over the him now, with litigants realizing he was denied the seat on the Supreme Court because the Senate determined he was a gang rapist. He will definitely have to work the rest of his days trying to rehabilitate himself…
Even I don’t find MIchael Avenatti credible.Kavanaugh was indeed accused of organizing alcohol and drug fueled Gang Rape Parties with his friend Mr. Judge, Swetnick reported she attended no fewer than 10 such events. Swetnick’s attorney, potential 2020 Presidential nominee Michael Avenatti unveiled the charges
What’s wrong with having someone who stands up for their reputation and cares what other people think?And that’s the kind of person you want on the Supreme Court?
Then you have to have a problem with the other accusations, if you’ve seen the Latin phraseEven I don’t find MIchael Avenatti credible.
I don’t like liars. Period.Hey, I can understand if you don’t care for Kavanaugh because of his political beliefs or even if you don’t like our President. But the thing I don’t like is destroying someone’s reputation with unproven and most likely false accusations in order to defeat him.
Huffington Post isn’t a newspaper at all, but just a liberal opinion website.I realize Catholics don’t care for the particular newspaper,
I don’t agree, but it doesn’t matter. The paper isn’t printing its opinion; it’s printing the opinion of those who knew, and know, Kavanaugh.Huffington Post isn’t a newspaper at all, but just a liberal opinion website.
An opinion piece is something the paper writes. Naturally, it’s going to be slanted.They are still just saying he was a drunk and he already said he sometimes drank too many bears. There is still no contradiction except the ones you and the opinion piece writer are reading into it. Blacking out doesn’t mean staggering, it means you don’t remember what happened. How would anyone know except the person unless he told people he blacked out?
They talk about other lies Kavanaugh’s told, to the Senate, that have nothing at all to do with drinking. I’m beginning to think the man is a compulsive liar.The direct quotes talk about drunkenness. He admitted to drinking too much. It’s not a lie just because he didn’t use identical words as others.