I
irishpatrick
Guest
I think people need to be careful attributing deep theological meanings to a tv show. I think the writers tossed this together as they went along.
I don’t. Or rather, I think a lot of it was thrown together, but that doesn’t mean there are no embedded theological/philosophical ideas, and it seems pretty clear that *some *of it was explicitly present from the beginning.I think people need to be careful attributing deep theological meanings to a tv show. I think the writers tossed this together as they went along.
I think the writers had no clue where they were going, the show has changed enormously since its beginning, and that was only after huge campaigns to get the writers to give answers, rather than perpetual week-after-week questions and more and more questions.I don’t. Or rather, I think a lot of it was thrown together, but that doesn’t mean there are no embedded theological/philosophical ideas, and it seems pretty clear that *some *of it was explicitly present from the beginning.
Edwin
I really do not believe the writers had any theology planned. I think the show morphed as it went along. Frankly, I think they were surprised how popular it was and they tried to find a way to keep the show going, but they realized people did not want to watch a modern Gilligan’s Island.Speaking of theology in LOST, here’s another article about that.
urbanfaith.com/2010/03/lost-and-found-theology.html
Sad, but true. This season, the fan ideas and theories (including the ones on this thread) have been way more interesting and coherent than the actual show. If there is a unifying theory to LOST, it is that everything is relative–including morality. People have mentioned here before that Carlton is Catholic (and thus wouldn’t insult the Church or traditional morality), but so are Nancy Pelosi and Rudy Giuliani.I think the writers had no clue where they were going, the show has changed enormously since its beginning, and that was only after huge campaigns to get the writers to give answers, rather than perpetual week-after-week questions and more and more questions.
I doubt the writers have much theology behind this.
I’m still holding out some hope that the finale will unexpectedly tie together many of the remaining mysteries of the show in a satisfying way. There are some large mysteries that are still unsolved. Why is Aaron important? Why was Walt so important that the Others terrorized the Losties in Season 1 just to capture him? Why was Christian’s apparitions so important and was he really the Smoke monster? What exactly was trapped in Jacob’s Cabin and why did it move? What’s up with the ash? What’s the deal with the mysterious food pallet drop in Season 2? Who built all the ruins on the Island (including the statue) and why? Why did the Others seem to have almost supernatural powers in Season 1 and 2 (remember Ethan’s strength)? What’s the deal with the failed pregnancies on the Island and why did it motivate the Others so much? Who started the chain of Island guardians and why? What is the origin of the smoke monster? Is it MIB’s disembodied soul or another entity? Why is the alternate universe important?Sad, but true. This season, the fan ideas and theories (including the ones on this thread) have been way more interesting and coherent than the actual show. If there is a unifying theory to LOST, it is that everything is relative–including morality. People have mentioned here before that Carlton is Catholic (and thus wouldn’t insult the Church or traditional morality), but so are Nancy Pelosi and Rudy Giuliani.
Not the full import of course, but there is probably some connection to the ash from Jacob’s burt body that Illana collected.What’s up with the ash?
That actually makes perfect sense. Because they cannot do harm to each other, the use of Jacob’s remains (or the remains of the prior guardians) would ward off any direct damage Smokey can cause. Ilana’s people in the temple were not so fortunate because he was able to indirectly kill those protecting themselves with the ashes.Not the full import of course, but there is probably some connection to the ash from Jacob’s burt body that Illana collected.
VC
Mumbles, I think it makes sense between Jacob and Smokey, (if you hold that Smokey is MiB, which may or may not be the case) but. . .Because they cannot do harm to each other, the use of Jacob’s remains (or the remains of the prior guardians) would ward off any direct damage Smokey can cause.
I like your #2 idea and think that that may be the case.Mumbles, I think it makes sense between Jacob and Smokey, (if you hold that Smokey is MiB, which may or may not be the case) but. . .
how do you explain that rule in force between past guardians and Smokey? Unless, each Past Guardian had a corresponding Smokey?
I really hope they explain what the relationship is between guardians and smokies. As far as I can tell, baded on Crazy-Mom’s ability to slaughter a village (and barring any other superpowers on her part), either:
If 2, perhaps the present case is an anomaly where two individuals are respectively the guardian and the smokey. Maybe twins were significant.
- Guardians control, or usually control Smokies, or
- Guardians and Smokies are two sides of the same coin.
VC
When you say “Illana’s people in the temple”, I think you are referring to how Bram got killed by Smokey’s cave-in in the statue after Jacob was murdered.That actually makes perfect sense. Because they cannot do harm to each other, the use of Jacob’s remains (or the remains of the prior guardians) would ward off any direct damage Smokey can cause. Ilana’s people in the temple were not so fortunate because he was able to indirectly kill those protecting themselves with the ashes.
I thought that after Sayid killed Dogan he brushed the dust away where he exited, thus allowing the smoke monster/MIB to enterWhen you say “Illana’s people in the temple”, I think you are referring to how Bram got killed by Smokey’s cave-in in the statue after Jacob was murdered.
As far as the temple goes, it was surrounded by a perimeter of ash but Smokey was still able to get in. His ability to enter the temple seems to be connected somehow with Dogan’s death. Is the potency of the ash mystically connected somehow with the life of the person who uses the ash? Or did Claire or one of Locke’s goons simply brush the ash away after entering the temple?
Yet another mystery to solve. T-minus 1 episode…
True enough. I enjoy the show, but I do not expect to get real theology from Hollywood writers. I think it is close to impossible to expect that in today’s culture.Sad, but true. This season, the fan ideas and theories (including the ones on this thread) have been way more interesting and coherent than the actual show. If there is a unifying theory to LOST, it is that everything is relative–including morality. People have mentioned here before that Carlton is Catholic (and thus wouldn’t insult the Church or traditional morality), but so are Nancy Pelosi and Rudy Giuliani.