M
Mickey
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff00c/ff00c63a843690c9b427c9a20157cbc6b0cc7e33" alt="40.png"
Mary is the mother of God. I don’t envision God being irrate and condemning an individual because s/he honors His mother.It is a question of giving Mary honor that belongs only to God.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂"
Mary is the mother of God. I don’t envision God being irrate and condemning an individual because s/he honors His mother.It is a question of giving Mary honor that belongs only to God.
Exactly what words of the angel in Scripture would give her that thought? None, that is so completely illogical. The angel is telling her what “shall” happen. She is engaged to be married, the angel tells her what “shall” happen. How can you even imagine she would think that? What did the angel say that gives you this impression?Not if Mary understood that she would have this child before her marriage.
No I don’t.This is where you lose us. And rightly so.
All honor all glory all praise be to you Lord.
You want to give Mary some of the glory that only God deserves.
HiBut we aren’t giving Mary honor that belongs only to God.
How could we?
She is God’s creation, just like us.
As His creation, she is also the Mother of God Himself.
He made her without the burden of original sin (i.e., “full of grace”)
Thus, she is an example for us to aspire to.
We can’t aspire to be God. Right? But we do want to be the very best that we can be for God? Right?
We honor her, we don’t worship her.
I honor my own mother above all other women on earth. One: she’s my mother. Two: she’s a very holy person.
I certainly don’t worship my mother, though. I don’t confuse her with God, and I don’t give her the honor that goes to God alone.
The Virgin Mary I honor above all other people (save God) in heaven. One? She’s my mother. Two: She is the holiest person–since she carried God Himself in her womb and was trusted to raise Him on this earth–who ever existed, with the exception of Jesus in the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity. To restate, she is the holiest “creation” that ever walked the earth.
I honor her, but it is the honor due a “primus inter pares”, so to speak–a first among equals. You’ve heard the term? Mary is a creation, like me. She is, among created beings, the highest.
But even the highest being cannot aspire to the heights of God, the creator. Him alone do we worship with all our being.
Honoring and attempting to emulate other creations who are holy and righteous only leads us CLOSER to God. It is a good thing to honor the saints who give us good example of how to live for God. But never, never do we equate them with God.
First……
I thought that Catholics believed that Mary was assumed to Heaven, if I am wrong then I’m sorry, I don’t think scripture states anywhere that she was…
…I don’t believe that I said Catholics believe that Jesus was imperfect, I did say that Catholics believe Mary was perfect, when in fact Jesus says in scripture that he was the only perfect one. I believe that to be true.
…I wrote in another post that if the pope were to come out and say that God had just appeared to him and told him that if every church member would go and dip there head in the Jordan river seven time then they would not have to go to purgatory, you would see thousand and thousands Catholics going to the Jordan jordan. That is what I meant by Catholics following man…
Xavier,We do not have the flesh of Christ in us.
How can you not read my scriptures and not know that we have Christ in us?
HiGod is no more offended when His creation (Mary) is praised than an artist is offended when his painting is praised.
Scott
The Bible tells us to honor those who came before us in the family of God. This is all we are doing. You are trying to equate honoring a member of God’s family with “worshipping” an idol such as “Baal.”This is where you lose us. And rightly so.
All honor all glory all praise be to you Lord.
You want to give Mary some of the glory that only God deserves.
Stop misspelling “IDOLATRY”…it doesn’t give you any more credibility than you already lack.Hi
I have one question for you, do you kneel before a statue and pray to your Mother like you do Mary? thats the difference we are trying to make. You can put as many fancy words around it as you want but kneeling before a statue is idolitry.
In Him and Him only, Dave.
oudave,Hi
I have one question for you, do you kneel before a statue and pray to your Mother like you do Mary? thats the difference we are trying to make. You can put as many fancy words around it as you want but kneeling before a statue is idolitry.http://forums.catholic-questions.org/images/icons/icon12.gif
In Him and Him only, Dave.
HiFirst…
You need to understand that just because something isn’t “iterated” in the Bible, doesn’t mean that it isn’t true. The Bible itself teaches that there are many things that were taught by word of mouth by the apostles that weren’t written down. For the first 4 centuries, there was no “canon” of the new testament. If the Bible is the only sole rule of faith, then what do you say of those first few centuries of people?? The Bible is venerated by the Church, but is NOT the sole rule of faith…it NEVER WAS, and it doesn’t say this anywhere in the Bible!
Secondly, Jesus’s statement that ALL have sinned has exceptions (and notice the context is about ACTUAL sin, NOT original sin)…
Exceptions to “all” have sinned…
All of the above are millions of exceptions to this “rule.” You must be conscious and knowing of your sin for it to be a sin. So, if there are millions of exceptions to his statement, then you must admit that he didn’t “actually” mean “all” in a literal sense. That being said, if there are exceptions, then why is it so ludicrous to believe what ALL of the Church fathers and Christians of the first 16 centuries believed about Mary’s sinlessness. Why is it so ludicrous to believe that the person carrying our SINLESS SAVIOUR was not preserved so herself, so as not to defile the Son of God in ANY WAY? WHY??? Can’t your God do that? I pity you, if your God is not capable of providing such an important, undefiled “womb” for His son.
- Jesus himself
- Babies
- Severely retarded
Your last comment shows your mis-understanding of the Papacy and the authority of the Church. The Pope, nor the Church has EVER said that the Pope has the ability for any new private revelation. The Church has ALWAYS taught that it’s purpose is to be the SERVANT of sacred scripture and tradition. It is protected by Jesus himself (Matt 16:12-19) from err in “interpreting” what has ALWAYS BEEN TAUGHT. The Catholic Church has NO RIGHT or claim to any rights of being able to “change” Christian doctrine. (and has never done so in 2000 years)
Peace.
What changes? Be specific.Your leaders do and have made changes that are not in scripture.
It does not matter the explanations that are revealed to our friend, Dave. His mind is made up. He has used the “statue” tract before, and he will use it again. Unfortunately, He cannot remove his reformist glasses for even a moment so that he may understand things objectively. But I will continue to pray for him—and so will our Blessed mother with all the angels and saints.oudave,
in this post you make an accusation of idolatry. The theological basis that supports this accusation rests entirely on a position of the body and it’s placement in the vicinity of a statue. Given the gravity of such a charge and the dignity due to the human person can you provide something more substantial? Can we for instance discuss what you mean by worship… or what catholics mean? before we go picking up two by fours to conk each other on the head?
Why do you make stuff up? The Church teaches that Jesus is our one and only savior.…If the Muslims are included in the plan of salvation and they don’t believe that Christ is The savior, Then the leaders of your church must not believe that Jesus is the only way to the Father…
HiWhat changes? Be specific.