M
MikeInVA
Guest
No, if a person is killed before he can be born nothing else matters.No . Abortion cannot be the only issue.
No, if a person is killed before he can be born nothing else matters.No . Abortion cannot be the only issue.
Nothing else matter for that person, but plenty matters for other people. Just because they were not killed in the womb does not mean we should ignore them.Maximus1:![]()
No, if a person is killed before he can be born nothing else matters.No . Abortion cannot be the only issue.
Nothing “justifies” the killing of the innocent. But there can be proportionate reasons to vote for a candidate who does not move to criminalize that killing. That does not comprise “justifying” the killing.drcube:![]()
So, what are the proportionate reasons that justify killing a million innocent children per year?which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.”
And we should do everything in our power to make sure no one is murdered in the womb.Just because they were not killed in the womb does not mean we should ignore them.
“Ensure” is impossible, no matter what you do.LeafByNiggle:![]()
And we should do everything in our power to make sure no one is murdered in the womb.Just because they were not killed in the womb does not mean we should ignore them.
You propose a virtue in inaction against evil.But there can be proportionate reasons to vote for a candidate who does not move to criminalize that killing.
No, that is just the way voting works. You can’t vote for everyone.LeafByNiggle:![]()
You propose a virtue in inaction against evil.But there can be proportionate reasons to vote for a candidate who does not move to criminalize that killing.
I have, on many occasions, invited pro-life posters here to support universal pre-natal health care and delivery services free of charge to reduce the incentive for abortion and to show women that we stand with them in their mission to bring forth new life. So far that invitation has been universally disregarded.That’s an invitation to disregard the issue.
What the dogma states is that abortion is evil. There is no dogma that says we must never vote for someone who declines to criminalize abortion. That is not dogma. As for politics, the view that overturning Roe v Wade is the best way to oppose abortion is one of those various approaches to politics that you mentioned.And that’s a shame. However Catholic doctrine allows for a variety of approaches to politics. The issue of the life of the unborn is dogma.
If it were a matter of one candidate killing babies and the other candidate cheating poor people, I would choose the one who is cheating poor people, so as to prevent the other candidate from killing babies. But that is not the choice. The politicians are not the ones doing the killing. It is the mothers and the doctors they hire and to some extent the friends of the woman who pressure her into getting an abortion. Just voting for the candidate who says “I’m against abortion” is just rolling the dice that whatever policy that candidate has will make those women change their minds and keep their babies, or put them up for adoption. But in the present election, many people believe that the Republican candidate is the the most corrupt President in history and a threat to the continued existence of our nation. People with that view do not trust that abortion will be ended just because he is elected. And therefore for them it is imperative that someone else be elected. If the only alternative is a Democrat who is pro-choice, it would be a proportionate reason to vote for that Democrat, and then do everything possible to convince others to respect life in the womb.Agreed. I’ve voted for the green party and the libertarians before because of their stance on other issues. I’m not coming at this from a vote Republican or else angle. However, abortion I would argue is the overriding concern. After all, it’s a bit odd to talk about caring for the less fortunate and vulnerable when putting aside the issue of the most vulnerable of all.
Of course not.No, that is just the way voting works. You can’t vote for everyone.
No, but they are the ones enacting laws that enable this to go on…or the ones that can impose a law to stop it.The politicians are not the ones doing the killing.
Trump has been true to his word thus far concerning abortion.Just voting for the candidate who says “I’m against abortion” is just rolling the dice that whatever policy that candidate has will make those women change their minds and keep their babies, or put them up for adoption
An arguable point.many people believe that the Republican candidate is the the most corrupt President in history and a threat to the continued existence of our nation.
The only proportional reason would be another intrinsic evil. At present, there isn’t one.If the only alternative is a Democrat who is pro-choice, it would be a proportionate reason to vote for that Democrat, and then do everything possible to convince others to respect life in the womb.
No, just Catholic teaching.There is no dogma on voting that demands what you demand.
Making abortion illegal will ensure that the vast majority of potential abortions will not occur. There are always people who violate laws, but we cannot refuse to take action unless it is 100% effective.“Ensure” is impossible, no matter what you do.
I just finished a book entitled “In Broad Daylight” about the endless stream of people in Ukraine who were complicit with the execution of Jews in village after village after village. Among the cart drivers, the ammunition carriers, the lunch preparers, the ditch diggers, the grave fillers were those for whom “plenty mattered”. After years of Soviet penury, the Jews’ belongings left behind were a boon. It “mattered”.Nothing else matter for that person, but plenty matters for other people.
Nor do we.Just because they were not killed in the womb does not mean we should ignore them.
There were plenty of people who thought they had “proportionate reasons” to carry ammunition to the SS shooters at the mass graves. Some feared for their own lives. Some received an article of clothing; a wrist watch, a horse, an entire house. Some believed they had been cheated by a Jew and believed all Jews were parasites on society.But there can be proportionate reasons to vote for a candidate who does not move to criminalize that killing.