My #1 reason for not converting...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Contrabass101
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I just don’t believe in excuses. They way ML was raised was probably not a lot different than most in that day and age.
That’s true. But given how many saints said nasty things about their enemies and favored the execution of heretics, I don’t see how you can condemn Luther and still be a Catholic. St. Cyril of Alexandria, St. John Chrysostom, St. Jerome, St. Thomas Aquinas, and St. Bernardine of Siena, and St. Thomas More would have to go for starters.

Edwin
 
That’s true. But given how many saints said nasty things about their enemies and favored the execution of heretics, I don’t see how you can condemn Luther and still be a Catholic. St. Cyril of Alexandria, St. John Chrysostom, St. Jerome, St. Thomas Aquinas, and St. Bernardine of Siena, and St. Thomas More would have to go for starters.

Edwin
Jesus must not have been a Christian. He said some nasty things about some people, His enemies, didn’t He? Your father is the devil a murderer and liar from the begining. You do the works of your father. You want to kill me. You blind guides. You hypocrits, you wash the outside of the cup, you whited sepluchres full of dead men’s bones. You are going to die in your sins (go to hell). We think today heresy is a good thing rather than fear the dreadful detstruction that it brings to souls and Christian civilization. The more versions of confusion the better. We welcome it and call it freedom. We call anarchy freedom. How can an Episcopalian call himself a Christian if he advocates the murder of unborn babies, or men marrying men, or makes a man who left his wife and and children for his male lover a bishop? This holocaust of 40 million dead babies and perversion is enlightened and just, but as long as we realize capital punishment is uncivilized and ungodly we are good Christians, better than not only the saints you mentioned, but all of them. Not one of them would be so enlightened as to extol the sin that cries to God for vengeance, or the slaughter of innocents. Yes, we should reject the saints and their miracles and the pope, and recognize a man as the head of our church who had seven wives, having disposed of most by early and violent means, and died of syphillus, whose illegitmate bastard daughter saw to the hanging, drawing and quartering of martyrs.
 
Well, I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree. Whether it’s a guitar or an organ, it can be used reverently or irreverently. Your comment regarding a guitar riff is very sarcastic and not even accurate. I specifically told you that the music played at the Mass I go to is contemporary Christian, not “hard rock” nor “heavy metal”! I’m assuming you just don’t like it when people don’t agree with you. :rolleyes:

If and until the Magisterium guided by the Holy Spirit agrees with you, I will defend my opinion. (I won’t be holding my breath.) 😉

Just out of curiosity, please list which instruments in your opinion ARE acceptable. :confused:
Where precisely are guitars in Mass used reverently? As noted several posts back (I presume you read it), “classical guitar” is a reverent style some of the time, folk and rock guitar never are. It was noted above that “Silent Night” was composed on guitar. There are no power chords in “Silent Night”.

As the detritus of the “folk Mass” and other Boomer fads fade, this is a problem which will take care of itself, as Joan Baez-style guitars get put away, and organ, voice, chamber instruments, etc replace such things, restoring reverence to the sacrifice of the Mass.

If it wouldn’t have provided the soundtrack for the Last Supper, it doesn’t belong in Mass.

Thankfully, this American fad is not so prevalent elsewhere to require dogmatic definition. Since it’s dying out, one need only avoid those Masses where such irreverent practices abound.

Of course, somebody will come up with the notion of taking the Protestant “praise band” into the presence of the Lord; there are always those Catholics who envy Protestant liturgical innovations.
 
That’s true. But given how many saints said nasty things about their enemies and favored the execution of heretics, I don’t see how you can condemn Luther and still be a Catholic. St. Cyril of Alexandria, St. John Chrysostom, St. Jerome, St. Thomas Aquinas, and St. Bernardine of Siena, and St. Thomas More would have to go for starters.

Edwin
There’s the small matter of 100,000 slaughtered German peasants on Luther’s head.

Not to mention little things like his confiscation and habitation of the monastery he formerly served in.

Not to mention the volumes of hateful things he said and their legacy.

Not to mention the pornographic woodcuts he commissioned.

So aside from that, no, nothing to condemn. 😉
 
Jesus must not have been a Christian. He said some nasty things about some people, His enemies, didn’t He? Your father is the devil a murderer and liar from the begining. You do the works of your father. You want to kill me. You blind guides. You hypocrits, you wash the outside of the cup, you whited sepluchres full of dead men’s bones. You are going to die in your sins (go to hell). We think today heresy is a good thing rather than fear the dreadful detstruction that it brings to souls and Christian civilization. The more versions of confusion the better. We welcome it and call it freedom. We call anarchy freedom. How can an Episcopalian call himself a Christian if he advocates the murder of unborn babies, or men marrying men, or makes a man who left his wife and and children for his male lover a bishop? This holocaust of 40 million dead babies and perversion is enlightened and just, but as long as we realize capital punishment is uncivilized and ungodly we are good Christians, better than not only the saints you mentioned, but all of them. Not one of them would be so enlightened as to extol the sin that cries to God for vengeance, or the slaughter of innocents. Yes, we should reject the saints and their miracles and the pope, and recognize a man as the head of our church who had seven wives, having disposed of most by early and violent means, and died of syphillus, whose illegitmate bastard daughter saw to the hanging, drawing and quartering of martyrs.
Henry VIII was an awful, awful man. The Anglican and Episcopalian of course must deal with the fact that their founder was such a wicked man.

We also must note that wicked men have occasionally found their way to the throne of St Peter.

The issue therefore is not the wickedness of Henry VIII and Martin Luther, but rather the sad fact that they led many men and women who were not wicked out of the Church, where their wickedness would have been checked by the Holy Spirit had they been granted the papacy to which each seemed to aspire.

Both men are long dead, and I personally believe the eternal reward they received involved not harps and wings but pitchforks and torments.

However, there are very few Anglicans, Episcopalians, and Lutherans today who believe what these men believed, much less who did as these men did.

As with the father and the prodigal son, we should pray that they return home. To the extent that peeling away the distortions of the protective mythology carefully weaved about the Reformers by their blushing supporters hastens their return home, it is useful. To the extent that it makes them feel they have no home to return to, it is not.

Edwin is not, to my knowledge, in favor of abortion, nor likely many of the things various Episcopalians today evince to support. Since the Episcopal Church in America is fracturing into a more conservative and a more “progressive” wing, we should be careful to note a significant proportion of Episcopalians do belong to the conservative wing, and not to hammer away at them for what their brothers and sisters do.

We have already seen impressive examples of conservative Episcopalians being willing to consider reunification with the Catholic Church; we should continue to make clear that past history is no barrier to doing so.

After all, I don’t feel the need to aplogize for the Borgias, do you?
 
Maybe I should clarify what I meant by understanding of the Mass. I meant the understanding prople take away from assisting at Mass. In fact I am certain that Catholics think of the Mass differently now than they used to. I was there. I remember. Let me give you an example. After Mass people used to silently leave the Church and many stayed to pray and reflect on the holy mysteries they witnessed. The Church was always silent in respect for people who migh come to pray and being in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament. Today immediately after Mass there is an uproar. If someone tries to stay and pray they are disregarded by the party going on. There has been a fundamental shift in attitude. This is only one example of it.
But I don’t think you can say that this shift in attitude,this difference, is due to the changes in Mass. It may be that it is harder for me to see your point on this since my personal experience is very different than yours. I don’t see a party after Mass. I still see people praying, lighting candles, and others quietly leaving to allow them to do so.

I also think a shift in attitude could be attributed to a changing culture. We have a much more casual culture in general than we did 50 years ago. Many people do not know how to behave anywhere, with there being no exception in Church. One would hope that people would realize that one’s behavoir should be different, more reverent, but these same people don’t see any problem with behavoirs that just would not have been tolerated 50 years ago in the general public much less church.

God Bless,
Maria
 
Scientific experiments point to the fact that certain musical instruments and even certain music has an affect on the individual’s brain and body functions that help induce an attitude that makes prayer more meaningful. Music which quiets the mind and helps one enter the reality of worship is something that church composers in the past understood. Certain music and certain instruments can close off this pensive approach, disrupting the mind and body to such an extent that it closes off these moods, thereby turning one’s self inward toward narcissism.
Well, then, why do they have this loud, profane, rock music to accompany today’s Catholic liturgy?
 
But I don’t think you can say that this shift in attitude,this difference, is due to the changes in Mass. It may be that it is harder for me to see your point on this since my personal experience is very different than yours. I don’t see a party after Mass. I still see people praying, lighting candles, and others quietly leaving to allow them to do so.

I also think a shift in attitude could be attributed to a changing culture. We have a much more casual culture in general than we did 50 years ago. Many people do not know how to behave anywhere, with there being no exception in Church. One would hope that people would realize that one’s behavoir should be different, more reverent, but these same people don’t see any problem with behavoirs that just would not have been tolerated 50 years ago in the general public much less church.

God Bless,
Maria
My experience is much more like what you describe than that of other posters. This is true whether I have attended Mass in WA, WI, CA, TX, or NC. I read an interesting statement by a non-Catholic. We, as Catholics, have a tendency to blame Vatican II for laxity and other changes. Non-Catholics do not have a “Vatican II” to blame. What is often overlooked is Vatican II recognized the changes that were already taking places in society. The Magisterium who participated in this Council took steps to address these changes. Reading the actual documents which are available to everybody shows a reality of what occurred rather than the misperceptions that many have. I find it interesting, for instance, that non-Catholic churches will advertise contemporary and traditional services. Many of the converts that I know point to the Eucharist and reverence shown by Catholics as their number 1 reason for converting. These conversions took place after Vatican II. Those whom my parents sponsored became Catholic, not because of the worship but because they saw how my family lived.
 
**GOOD QUESTION!:hmmm: **
Are there parishes where loud, profane rock music is played during Mass?

The only dodgy thing I’ve seen myself has been the folk Mass, which is neither loud nor profane but merely insufficiently reverent.

I have yet to see a Catholic equivalent to the Protestant innovation of the “praise band”, but perhaps others have.
 
Are there parishes where loud, profane rock music is played during Mass?

The only dodgy thing I’ve seen myself has been the folk Mass, which is neither loud nor profane but merely insufficiently reverent.

I have yet to see a Catholic equivalent to the Protestant innovation of the “praise band”, but perhaps others have.
Parishes in the African-American communities are into praise bands as well as gospel during celebration of Mass. It’s unique to their tradition and…it’s way cool!

Music sets the mood in all cases. So does the art. I find being in an architecturally ‘sound’ building where those involved attempt to actually bring Heaven to earfth to be conducive to prayer, meditation, and the seriousness of Mass. I’ve been in churches which resemble barns, pyramids, and funeral homes. In one parish not too far from here, they had to re-renovate what they did five years before. They had a baptism ‘pool’ with St. Michael the Archangel pouring water from a large vase. However, depending on what side of the ‘theatre’ you were sitting in, it looked as if he was actually urinating ROFL
 
Parishes in the African-American communities are into praise bands as well as gospel during celebration of Mass. It’s unique to their tradition and…it’s way cool!

Music sets the mood in all cases. So does the art. I find being in an architecturally ‘sound’ building where those involved attempt to actually bring Heaven to earfth to be conducive to prayer, meditation, and the seriousness of Mass. I’ve been in churches which resemble barns, pyramids, and funeral homes. In one parish not too far from here, they had to re-renovate what they did five years before. They had a baptism ‘pool’ with St. Michael the Archangel pouring water from a large vase. However, depending on what side of the ‘theatre’ you were sitting in, it looked as if he was actually urinating ROFL
Well, don’t get me started on the “Strip Mall Cathedral” style of architecture… there’s a good thread to be had sharing pictures of the worst offenders there.

Gospel would be fine were it reverent—the charismatic churches tend less to reverence and more to joy, which would be fine were Mass not the sacrifice of Christ.

Praise bands are completely inappropriate for Mass. It is quite simply impossible to find reverence where such are found.

And isn’t it telling that in most parishes one cannot even see the organist, the usual accompaniest for Mass, while praise bands typically appear before the altar, front and center?

There’s a reason for that, I expect, and it has everything to do with entertainment and a need for spotlight. I have yet to hear an organist shout “one more time!” to inflict another verse either.
 
And yes, outside of Mass I do enjoy plenty of guitar-based music, especially blues, rock, and even a bit of folk.

Mass not being about my musical preferences, however, I leave them at the sanctuary door.

When I face Christ at the end, I rather doubt I’ll hear, “Great riff, thou good and faithful servant—Rock on!”
I lilke praise and worship music, like by Michael W. Smith, but not for mass.

For the last two years we sang “Ride on Jesus Ride” on Palm Sunday. I don’t know if it was a reference to Jesus entering Jerusalem on a donkey, but it reminds me of a Harley song. AWFUL!
 
My experience is much more like what you describe than that of other posters. This is true whether I have attended Mass in WA, WI, CA, TX, or NC. I read an interesting statement by a non-Catholic. We, as Catholics, have a tendency to blame Vatican II for laxity and other changes. Non-Catholics do not have a “Vatican II” to blame. I find it interesting, for instance, that non-Catholic churches will advertise contemporary and traditional services. Many of the converts that I know point to the Eucharist and reverence shown by Catholics as their number 1 reason for converting. These conversions took place after Vatican II.
It has been my experience as well that one of the main reasons converts are first attracted to the CC is the reverence we Catholics show in our worship.

I know that we are no longer silent after masses, and that it may seem like a party to Grandfather, but I think humans are social, we come to mass to “celebrate” together. During mass, we must remain reverent and speak only at the appointed times. After mass, well we are not cloistered nuns and monks. We are a community. Perhaps we should remain silent in the church itself until we get to the Vestibule. But it gets crowded in the Vestibule too, and the sound carries into the church. Sometimes mass is the only time that week I see some of my friends, (most of my life revolves around my parish, it is the center of our community). Maybe it’s modernism, but I can’t see going to mass with all these people who are my friends, and then silently slump away.

My time alone with Jesus is weekly Eucharistic Adoration. It is absolutely silent for one hour every week. So ancient, incense, Benediction, Latin Tantum Ergo. Adoration is one event I must leave in silent reverence. And before 6:30 AM mass.

Sunday mass is so much different than daily 6:30 AM mass. At 6:30 AM, it is silent. In the winter, it is a warmth drawing me in, the smell of candles, the light. People running in in the dark from all directions on foot. In the summer, it is a cool refuge, the marble. The quiet brings me close to Jesus in the Consecration in a way that a crowded Sunday mass never will, no matter how quiet people are.
Parishes in the African-American communities are into praise bands as well as gospel during celebration of Mass. It’s unique to their tradition and…it’s way cool!
Having participated in a nearby African-American Catholic church singfest, I must confess, I walked out with a head-ache and ears ringing. It was too loud and too much activity.
It was not a mass, so maybe that is the reason. It was in a beautiful Gothic church, but the sounds were bouncing off the walls.

My personal opinion is Catholics are very tolerant of one another. We are so different in our approaches, but our common belief in the Sacrifice of the mass draws us together in communion.

I pray that we can come to a resolution about these very real concerns.
 
Having participated in a nearby African-American Catholic church singfest, I must confess, I walked out with a head-ache and ears ringing. It was too loud and too much activity.
It was not a mass, so maybe that is the reason. It was in a beautiful Gothic church, but the sounds were bouncing off the walls.

My personal opinion is Catholics are very tolerant of one another. We are so different in our approaches, but our common belief in the Sacrifice of the mass draws us together in communion.

I pray that we can come to a resolution about these very real concerns.
Do you remember when John Paul II would celebrate Mass throughout the world in different cultures? Some of what I saw on the TV made my mouth drop as far as the music, liturgical dancing and other things that went on. It is amazing that he allowed it, but it was obvious he was enjoying the communal aspect of the people who had come together for worship.
 
I lilke praise and worship music, like by Michael W. Smith, but not for mass.

For the last two years we sang “Ride on Jesus Ride” on Palm Sunday. I don’t know if it was a reference to Jesus entering Jerusalem on a donkey, but it reminds me of a Harley song. AWFUL!
I must admit that I find praise and worship music wanting as music and for its intended purpose. Most of it just isn’t very good, in my personal opinion.

As noted earlier, I do have an extensive music collection which is dominated by rock, blues, and pop, which in turn are dominated by guitar. I enjoy it.

But not for Mass.

I am sure others enjoy art forms which are perfectly wonderful in their own right, but which would not be appropriate during Mass.

This does not make these bad. It does not make them less of an art form. They simply aren’t appropriate.

When I was a young cadet, a lot of time and effort was expended teaching me and my fellow cadets what behavior was appropriate in various settings. We learned the proper table setting and which utensil to use when. We learned the proper way to introduce oneself and one’s date to others. We learned how to chew small bites (oh, how we learned that one—woe to anyone who couldn’t respond to a question in less than seven chews and a swallow) so as not to halt conversation or offend. We learned all these things, at no small expense to the American taxpayer, because military officers were expected to conduct themselves as gentlemen, and to set a proper example for others. No small thing in a meritocracy, mind you.

Likewise, we as Catholics ought to set the example for Christians, particularly at Mass. Protestants may be forgiven for not being reverent in the sanctuary—they do not believe they are in the physical presence of the Lord, after all. We have no such excuse.

As a wonderfully plainspoken visiting priest from Texas put it in a recent homily, “You’re the Body of Christ. Act like it!”
 
Do you remember when John Paul II would celebrate Mass throughout the world in different cultures? Some of what I saw on the TV made my mouth drop as far as the music, liturgical dancing and other things that went on. It is amazing that he allowed it, but it was obvious he was enjoying the communal aspect of the people who had come together for worship.
Yes, I remember it now. It was so wonderful that JP II celebrated this way.

Things have gotten way out of context now. It’s like Americans are supposed to be Africans, or Philipino now. Catholicism embraces many cultures, but the culture should not embrace Catholicism. I just don’t believe in fake affiliations. We have a lot of Polish and German people in our parish. It makes no sense to pretend Spanish or whatever PC “langue du jour” is what we are about, when we are not.
 
IWhen I was a young cadet, a lot of time and effort was expended teaching me and my fellow cadets what behavior was appropriate in various settings. We learned the proper table setting and which utensil to use when. We learned the proper way to introduce oneself and one’s date to others. We learned how to chew small bites (oh, how we learned that one—woe to anyone who couldn’t respond to a question in less than seven chews and a swallow) so as not to halt conversation or offend. We learned all these things, at no small expense to the American taxpayer, because military officers were expected to conduct themselves as gentlemen, and to set a proper example for others. No small thing in a meritocracy, mind you.

Likewise, we as Catholics ought to set the example for Christians, particularly at Mass. Protestants may be forgiven for not being reverent in the sanctuary—they do not believe they are in the physical presence of the Lord, after all. We have no such excuse.

As a wonderfully plainspoken visiting priest from Texas put it in a recent homily, “You’re the Body of Christ. Act like it!”
Thanks Tef for putting it all in a nutshell. I still think we should have the draft if for no other reason, that to mix the haves with the I should haves and the truly have nots.
 
Well, then, why do they have this loud, profane, rock music to accompany today’s Catholic liturgy?
A young woman I know, 25 years old, and a devout Catholic went last nght to her first Traditional Mass. She had no experience with it at all in her entire life. The reason she went was a college music class requirment to write a report on any musical performance. She normally attends a local novice ordo Mass where there is a very good priest and she has no complaints there. She learned that this Mass would take place 100 miles from her home and that there would be a choir singing ancient hymns, so she drove there to fulfill her Mass and course requirement. Her mother asked her later last night how she liked it. She said she was unprepared for what happened. She said she was completely overwhelmed, spiritually and emotionally, and cried through the entire Mass, because it was so beautiful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top