Sister Amy
I believe that those verses, and some others were protests by Mohammad against the Trinity or related teaching from Christians. I believe Mohammad had heard about it, and choose not to believe it. I agree with him because the Trinity as he understood it was not what the real Church was teaching. The true Church was not teaching that God has a wife or that God was once single and then got married somehow/where/when.
Eh? You believe those “verses” are protests against the Trinity? Based on what?
In fact, the Trinity (nor Christians, even, in the first) have nothing to do with those ayaat. As I’ll demonstrate.
For 6:100-101, the surah itself is Makki, so revealed before Muslims were actually themselves encountering Christians. So there’d be no cause to discuss the Trinity at all in the first place. If as many Christians here erroneously believe Muhammad was fabricating it all, then they have to square with how he heard about Christianity before actually coming into contact with Christians. Historically, logically it makes no sense.
Moreover, the causes for the revelation of these ayaat are known.
From Ibn Kathir: This Ayah refutes the idolators who worshipped others besides Allah
and associated the Jinns with Him in worship. Glory be to Allah above this Shirk and Kufr. If someone asks, how did the idolators worship the Jinns, although they only were idol worshippers The answer is that in fact, **they worshipped the idols **by obeying the Jinns who commanded them to do so.
Clearly it has nothing to do with Christians, but rather it’s talking about the idol-worshippers in Makkah.
As for the other passage, 72:3, it’s also Makki, and is a saying of the
jinn, talking about the jinn saying such things about Allah. Christians are humans, not jinn.
So yet again, this passage has nothing to do with Christians or the Trinity.
Jumping to that conclusion is jumping wildly out of context.
As for the third, it is the ones Christians most frequently fail to understand. In fact, it does allude to Christian practices, in particular worship of Jesus, and also worship of Mary (a long complicated topic, suffice to say that although Catholics claim not to worship Mary, according to the standard of Islam, their devotion and prayer to her is in fact considered worship.)
But the passage does NOT mention the Trinity.
In fact, the passage which DOES mention the Trinity (it’s 4:171) doesn’t say anything about a “wife” or “consort.”