I’m reading the arguments on both sides and I’m stunned. Not a single argument has been made for sanctity.
We don’t do things or not do things because they are pleasing to us. We do some things and not others, because they lead us to holiness.
One thing that certainly leads us away from holiness is the absence of charity. Whether one is for female altar servers or opposed to the idea, the language and the hostility here between Catholics is unjustifiable. No matter which camp you’re in, you’ll score no points with the Lord if you treat your brother like garbage.
Speaking about holiness, the cross is about obedience. Christ obeyed even unto death. We are not Protestants, with all due respect to Protestants. I understand them when they speak about “the bible says” or “the bible does not say”. Catholics don’t function that way. We have never functioned that way. We have always maintained that there is a three-fold system of authority: Tradition, Magisterium and Scripture. Notice that scripture is mentioned third, because the Church put it together. The bible did not build the Church. The argument that the bible says or does not say does not hold water when it’s used to contradict the authority of the Church.
If we believe what the bible says, then we must face the a priori question: who put it into the bible? Answer: The Church. The same Church that put the bible together and whose authority we trust when we accept the bible is the Church that says that females may not be altar servers in the EF. No one goes to heaven, because they serve mass. However, every canonized saint has been a shining example of obedience to the Church. Conforming to Christ Crucified, who was obedient unto death, seems to be the common thread among the saints.
This also applies to those who would throw stones at the use of female altar servers in the OF. If the Church allows it, it is because she has the authority to do so. This side is equally wrong and equally disobedient in challenging what the Church allows.
All of us would do well to take what the Church says and do as we’re told. If you can have female servers in the OF, accept it and stop complaining. If you cannot have them in the EF, accept that too and stop complaining.
There are two attitudes that are far from Christian. First, is the obscene lack of charity on both sides. The second is the arrogance. The Church’s government has not been handed over to the faithful. Therefore, it is arrogant to the extreme to think that the faithful have the right to demand and to threaten, as some have posted all over the place . . .“we should stop donating” or “we should ignore” or “we should not do this or that and see what the Church does.” Common’ folks, that is arrogance. That is not faith.
You belong to the Church because it’s part of your journey toward holiness. It’s not a club, nor a civic organization that we control and where we get to opine on what should happen next. The Church is both a community on a journey toward holiness and an organization that has a leadership with the authority to make rules for its members. It has never been a democratic organization. If truth were told, there are no purely democratic organizations. Every organization has an infrastructure that even the vote of the membership cannot change.
I also think that it’s time that we stopped with the claim that everything is discrimination. Not everything is discrimination. Some things are tradition. There is nothing wrong with tradition. We have traditions all around us, in our homes, families, nations, cities, places of employment and so forth. If one does not like a tradition, one can take a deep breadth and go on or bail out. Attending a mass with a female server or without a female server is a one hour a week affair. I think that all of us can live with one hour of something that we don’t like. The truth is that there is much to be gained by offering my patience and charity in the face of something that I don’t like. It may save my soul.
Let’s stop with the meanness and focus on holiness.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF