J
Julius_Caesar
Guest
Your text is one among many.But that doesn’t exclude the freedom of the will to reject grace
Your text is one among many.But that doesn’t exclude the freedom of the will to reject grace
Well, sure, But it states the opposite of what you describe about monergism.JonNC:
Your text is one among many.But that doesn’t exclude the freedom of the will to reject grace
No. It describes Lutheran monergism.Julius_Caesar:
Well, sure, But it states the opposite of what you describe about monergism.JonNC:
Your text is one among many.But that doesn’t exclude the freedom of the will to reject grace
Which is the opposite of what you described.JonNC:
No. It describes Lutheran monergism.Julius_Caesar:
Well, sure, But it states the opposite of what you describe about monergism.JonNC:
Your text is one among many.But that doesn’t exclude the freedom of the will to reject grace
How much credit do you take for your holiness?And monergism teaches that a person who is saved has his nature acted on by God so that he can act accordingly. There is no endgame then, since that’s the result.
Do you choose to be holy?Julius_Caesar:
How much credit do you take for your holiness?And monergism teaches that a person who is saved has his nature acted on by God so that he can act accordingly. There is no endgame then, since that’s the result.
And do you have to accept that grace?Only by the grace of God.
I’ll defer to someone who professes OSAS.Not the opposite really, when it’s also quoted by Luther that man is a donkey that can either be ridden by God or Satan.
And let me ask you a question: Is it love of God when under OSAS you can’t do otherwise?
The doctrine always seemed a bit presumptuous at worst-or a moot, academic point at best. Because we can never have 100% certainty that we’re numbered among the elect, or that we’ll persevere to the end. We can only say that, if a person is elected, then of course they’ll persevere, they will be saved. We can have a sort of guarded assurance, knowing God’s promises and trustworthiness combined with a consideration of any fruit in our lives that should result from fellowship with Him. But humility is called for in light of our limitations, human weaknesses, and sin.The Perseverance of the Saints - is thus a doctrine which at its core asks a question - the most important question any of us can ask - “Am I a true follower of Christ?”
And that’s my answer: Do you or do you not have to say Yes to God?I’ve answered your question - you owe me an answer. I’ll ask again: How much credit do you take for your holiness?
Every Calvinist I have met thinks they are of the elect.Reformed Christians look at our lives and, the more we grow in our faith - the more sinfulness we see. We are convicted more and more of our need for a savior.
You are too kind Gaius. And any humility I have is false at best. My pride is legendary (ask my wife).Every Calvinist I have met thinks they are of the elect.
So Calvinism didn’t inspire the same humility you have.
Yes - but that’s not the point of the doctrine. The point is to influence how we actually live our lives. Are we constantly seeing the Holy Spirit active in our lives? Are we actually dying to ourselves and our selfish, sinful desires?Because we can never have 100% certainty that we’re numbered among the elect, or that we’ll persevere to the end.
You keep asking this question when it’s already been answered in the negative. There is no such thing as sinless perfection. There is such a thing as sanctification and the fruit of the Spirit and the love of God spread abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit.So there is some form of salvation/baptism that allows you to stop sinning? I don’t think so.
We agree on this - we’re just drawing different conclusions.You keep asking this question when it’s already been answered in the negative. There is no such thing as sinless perfection.