Open Thread on Zimmerman Verdict

  • Thread starter Thread starter sweetcharity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m sorry that analogy doesn’t work.

David didn’t have a gun - he had a slingshot.

David was younger than Goliath.

David didn’t go looking for Goliath

Goliath was armed and looking for a fight.
Ummm…it was being applied to Prosecution (Goliath) vs the Defense (David), not TM & GZ
 
Armed adult stalked unarmed teen and killed him after a confrontation that could have been avoided if Z had let the real police do their job.
No evidence he stalked the teen.

Z did call the police to do their job.

Confrontation was initiated by Martin.

It all could have been avoided if Z had simply not called the police, had not tried to assist his neighbors, had stuck to simply looking out after himself.
 
It has happened its happened to ppl I know. I’ve been called cracker honkey and all that by a group of blacks. It happens.
Blacks that are racist are known to be up random whites? Do you have a verifiable link to stats on how often this happens? Blacks just beating up random whites? Good grief
 
No evidence he stalked the teen.

Z did call the police to do their job.

Confrontation was initiated by Martin.

It all could have been avoided if Z had simply not called the police, had not tried to assist his neighbors, had stuck to simply looking out after himself.
👍
 
If he had retreated, how could possibly lethal force be used against him?
Sigh. I’m going to repeat myself.

It seems to me that Zimmerman is being blamed for not being prescient enough. Hindsight is always 20/20, but how in the world could Zimmerman have begun to guess that the young man he saw would jump him and pummel him, and pound his head on concrete because he dared to exit his truck (and was trying to go back to it, retreating, when he was jumped)?
 
And oversized young men who slam ppls head into the cement should get the blame. Z was the victim.
Armed adult stalked unarmed teen and killed him after a confrontation that could have been avoided if Z had let the real police do their job.
 
Or perhaps it was because Martin was a racist (the “creepy cracker” racist comment he made) and being high on marijuana (the autopsy results found THC in his system), he wanted to test out his MMA fighting skills. Just as some whites are racist, so are some blacks. And blacks who are racist are known to beat up random whites they see. I know because it happened to me when I was a kid. I’m only half-white, but they mistook me for white. I used to know of some all black neighborhoods that if a white person walked through it was a guarantee they would get jumped and beat up just for being white.
Blacks that are racist are known to be up random whites? Do you have a verifiable link to stats on how often this happens? Blacks just beating up random whites? Good grief
I was speaking from my own personal experience growing up and the neighborhoods that I grew up in and knew about. Sorry, but there wasn’t anyone there to take a survey and measure results each of the times I got beat up.
 
Martin didn’t have to physically attack Zimmerman. Zimmerman wasn’t breaking any law in what he did, as the court decided.
At this point I’m not talking about the law anymore. I am saying that the unnecessary loss of life could have bee avoided had Z let police do their jobs. As Catholics we should never desire the loss of life!
 
Armed adult stalked unarmed teen and killed him after a confrontation that could have been avoided if Z had let the real police do their job.
From what I’ve read this seems accurate.

Most of the rest is conjecture.
 
Remind me again just how well Chicago’s gun laws are working. Nevermind the fact that Zimmerman was found not guilty by a jury of his peers. Obama’s comments are disturbing.

More inside the link: breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/07/14/Obama-Responds-to-Zimmerman-Verdict-Stem-the-Tide-of-Gun-Violence
President Barack Obama issued a long-awaited response Sunday afternoon to the acquittal of George Zimmerman Saturday evening, reminding Americans to temper “passions,” and that “we are a nation of laws and the jury has spoken.”
He added that Americans should “honor” the life of Trayvon Martin by committing to **“stem the tide of gun violence,” **and “ask ourselves if we are doing all we can to widen the circle of compassion in our communities.”
 
And oversized young men who slam ppls head into the cement should get the blame. Z was the victim.
What “oversized”? Autopsy said he was 5ft 10. Never had to happen if Z had stayed in his car and waited for police. No had to be a super hero.
 
Ummm…it was being applied to Prosecution (Goliath) vs the Defense (David), not TM & GZ
How does that analogy apply in your opinion? It still doesn’t work. Zimmerman was given money from strangers for his defense. His truthfulness about that money in the initial bond hearing was suspect.
 
:yup:
I was speaking from my own personal experience growing up and the neighborhoods that I grew up in and knew about. Sorry, but there wasn’t anyone there to take a survey and measure results each of the times I got beat up.
 
No. My point was that in the wake of SYG laws, killings of blacks seem to be more legally justified. I accept the Church’s teachings on self-defense. But retreat is a viable option of self-defense, as well.
I fail to understand how a law that does not mention race at all in its text can be said to differentiate treatment of people based upon race.
 
Retreat is not a viable option when the attacker is on top of you.
Of course not - and this doesn’t contradict GracePool’s point does it?:confused:

Retreat is an option - until it becomes not viable -then it is not an option.

Then self defence becomes an option.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top