I
inJESUS
Guest
randel said:Hi inJesus,Adam was born with both abilities (i.e to commit sin and not to) and this is how God created man.If man was created perfect with no ability to commit sin, then God’s command to Adam to refrain from the forbiden tree, makes no sense.Before eating the forbidden tree Adam was obviously sinless thus he was born sinless. It is this first and foremost nature we all inherit as such we all are born sinless thus if you die when you are a baby, you deserve heaven, Eternal life.Now the changes that took place in Adam’s existence after eating the forbidden tree, are not like inheritable otherwise God would not have accepted Adam’s repentance and He would have let him suffer eternally. But since God did accept his repentace/prayer, thus whatever change(s) happened in Adam’s physical body is due to his personal act and shouldn’t have a domino effect or continuous inheritable effect. This change may be taken as, if you eat/drink/swallow certain chemicals that you are allergic to, then if any drastic/severe changes happened in your body; then these changes may not neccessarily effect your nature or cease your ability to do good things as such your progeny may not be as rebellious/pious as you are. The most they may inherit from you is some or more or similar physical/genetical properties of you but spiritual/character will be their own and not neccessarily just like yours.The initial and first command/warning of God to Adam itself is a proof that God had given man a free choice to man to excercise it even in the Paradise.Now that Paradise is not neccessarily the same type of Paradise (heaven) that the Law abiding people with God’s Mercy will eventually inherit in the Afterlife because these man who are going to live in the Heaven in the Afterlife, are spiritualised men and not men like of Adam or our present physical nature. Because when Adam was born, it was his first birth, and he was placed in the Garden as it is and not after his death and resurrected spiritual form.So the heaven that Adam was placed in and the one all godly people will dwell in after their spiritualised resurrection, may not neccessarily the same and not neccessarily a sign of closeness to God, because God is beyond human imagination and everything (that is known and unkown to men) are within God’s control but God is not neccessarily exists/resides in every created thing or everywhere.regarding original sin, there are theological schools about it so it’s not a big deal for me whether we have the same exact interpretation or not…unlike what muslims think, it is not the original sin idea that made Jesus’ death purposefull…whether you believe in orginal sin or original grace is fine with me.And at the end of the day (as FAITH said), no other person is responsible for your sins/mistakes or good deeds. Period.
Logically and rationally the greatness of man should not be him being born as totally immune to commit any sin. The greatness and God’s Mercy on man is him being born with both abilities of doing sin/mistake or refrain from sin/mistake, and then if commits any sin/mistake repent to God becaue this life is a trial with free choice. If you are born sinless thus did not make mistake then what trial you really went through? If you wear a fire proof dress head to toe and burned yourself with fire and did not die, and claimed that “see I did not die nor fire burned my up nor I was afraid of fire while I burning myself”, then I would say “what is the big deal?”
Jesus born like Adam? what do you mean?Now comig to Jesus’ birth. He too was a man and born as a man just like Adam. Thus Jesus’ greatness is despite being born just like us, refrained from all major sins.
yea but why are you discussing this here and where did you get the idea from?Saying that Jesus was God and did not commit sin, is a meaningless statement. Because, what God had to do with the sins, anyway? God is God.
would you remind me of where i wrote this?Did you notice how meaningless is your idea of God becoming a perfect sinless man?