Parents’ ‘Sex Ed Sit Out’ Protesting Forced Gender Ideology in Schools Spreads Across Country

[mVitus]

First of all, no it’s not, at least not to my recollection.

I couldn’t find a quote, but I’m pretty sure it’s against rules. And even if not, it’s still amoral to encourage it.

 

[Alex337]

I totally agree with equality, but I think it’s a very complex subject that people are having a hard time grasping. I was flipped off the other day on the road by a woman. My initial question to her would be, do you want to be treated equal in regards to the possible repercussions of such an action?

laylow:

the possible repercussions of

Women only tend to want 100% equal treatment when it benefits them.

If 100% equal treatment would lead to unwanted consequences, they tend to embrace inequality.

Of course, it’s a myth that men and women are exactly equal in every way. Women are capable of things which men are incapable of; men are capable of things which women are incapable of - that’s not sexist, it’s reality.

I always wonder why some folks react to women wanting equality with instant thoughts of vague violence.

If it helps women have campaigned for the right to serve on the frontline; I hardly think that is us shirking equality when it doesn’t suit us.

 

[laylow]

Women only tend to want 100% equal treatment when it benefits them.

If 100% equal treatment would lead to unwanted consequences, they tend to embrace inequality.

Of course, it’s a myth that men and women are exactly equal in every way. Women are capable of things which men are incapable of; men are capable of things which women are incapable of - that’s not sexist, it’s reality.

Totally agree.

 

[Alex337]

Now I really do want to continue this discussion but it’s past midnight here and I have work tomorrow
So please excuse me, I’ll try to answer things tomorrow.

 

[laylow]

I always wonder why some folks react to women wanting equality with instant thoughts of vague violence.

If it helps women have campaigned for the right to serve on the frontline; I hardly think that is us shirking equality when it doesn’t suit us.

I can only see the reaction of the general populous if our disagreement resulted in a fist fight. I’m sure I could count the people that would take my “side” on one hand.

 

[Alex337]

You see what I mean? I have to ask; what part of Christs teachings tells you to punch your fellow man for disagreeing with you?

(That being said I’m a rough and tumble sort, so I don’t think it would be terribly unfair)

 

[Spyridon]

If it helps women have campaigned for the right to serve on the frontline; I

I am a US Military Veteran.

If I’m serving in a frontline infantry unit, I don’t want women in my platoon. They are a burden and a hazard because they are generally weaker and slower than men. They are also an issue with troop morality due to the temptation of fraternizing.

I would refuse to serve in a frontline platoon if women were part of it. Thankfully, the US military hasn’t lost its mind yet and allowed women to serve in frontline infantry.

Our Military capability and readiness would be severely impacted if women were in all our infantry units.

There’s a reason why SpecOps like the Seals, Pararescue, etc are men only. Because women are incapable, in general, of carrying out the tasks associated with SpecOps.

 

[ConfusedLucy]

In a better world neither men or women would be at risk from violence.

 

[Alex337]

It held to the same physical standards I see no problem with it. Other militaries seem to have women up front just fine.

 

[Alex337]

Now I really am off to bed! It’s been a great conversation, thanks to all involved, and I look forward to continuing on tomorrow.

 

[Spyridon]

It held to the same physical standards I see no problem with it.

If they could pass the exact same PT test and tasks and training, and if there was a strict no fraternization policy, I’d consider it.

The fact of the matter however, is that very few women, even women already in the US Army for example, would be able to pass the male PT tests and infantry training.

 

[JanetF]

Women only tend to want 100% equal treatment when it benefits them.

If 100% equal treatment would lead to unwanted consequences, they tend to embrace inequality.

Of course, it’s a myth that men and women are exactly equal in every way. Women are capable of things which men are incapable of; men are capable of things which women are incapable of - that’s not sexist, it’s reality.

I totally agree with this!!!

 

[laylow]

In a better world neither men or women would be at risk from violence.

Can’t totally agree 100%. Sometimes things are warranted.

It would be a better world if people didn’t flip others off unwarranted. Especially during a situation where they expect to avoid confrontation (in a car, etc.)

 

[Spyridon]

I totally agree with this!!!

Thank you @JanetF

Incidentally, the two most important people in my life - my wife and my mother - would also wholeheartedly agree.

Especially with the fact that women are capable of things which men are incapable of!

 

[ConfusedLucy]

It doesn’t make violence necessary even if it’s tempting.

 

[laylow]

It doesn’t make violence necessary even if it’s tempting.

A lack of a threat of it creates uncontrollable complacency from my experience.

 

[ConfusedLucy]

I just don’t think it’s any better for a man to have to take a beating, I suppose you could argue men have more sense skulls but it doesn’t make it morally right.

 

[blackforest]

We try to teach that anyone may be uncomfortable around, well, anyone in certain situations. And it is good to respect peoples comfort zones. Everyone has a need for privacy at times.

Would this principle apply to teens who wish to opt out of the class? Are their sexual boundaries being honored in this regard?

 

[laylow]

I just don’t think it’s any better for a man to have to take a beating, I suppose you could argue men have more sense skulls but it doesn’t make it morally right.

I never said anyone HAD to take a beating.

Consider this scenario:

A less physically imposing male is upset by something that happened on the road, but refrains from a reaction to hopefully avoid confrontation. He does so because he feels like he would be at a disadvantage in a possible physical confrontation.

A less physically imposing woman is upset by something that happened on the road, but decides that she will display her displeasure in the form of a middle finger. She decides to do so because she has concluded society says that it would be improper for a man to impose any physical harm onto her under ANY circumstances.

Under both circumstances, that odds are overwhelmingly against these particular drivers in “prevailing” in a physical confrontation. However, because of one’s sex, a different decision is made due to complacency of a misguided system of logic.

 

[Trickypixie]

It may be against practice for teachers. It is common practice in the queer community. I don’t know why you would have difficulty figuring out that you were a girl or that you would become a woman but I don’t think that’s a common experience 4 little girls. I never questioned my gender. The queer community has every single teenager and children much younger questioning this because they have promoted questioning as being the norm, when in fact it is a disorder.
The politically correct movement distorts the truth and the queer community is oppressive once the question is asked.
If a child questions, no one is allowed to ask real questions in response no matter how reasonable. We are called bullies because we don’t buy the lack of facts supporting the conclusion.