Parents’ ‘Sex Ed Sit Out’ Protesting Forced Gender Ideology in Schools Spreads Across Country

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxirad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Your trans friend chose to forgo parenthood.
Not the same as somebody going through infertility at all
 
0Scarlett_nidiyilii said:
Your trans friend chose to forgo parenthood.
Not the same as somebody going through infertility at all
Click to expand...
No, she’s actually adopting at the moment. But what she can never experience is the same thing my grandmothers couldn’t; carrying a child and eventually giving birth.
 
Loud-living-dogma said:
The motivation? What is the evil one’s motivation? Destroying humanity and the good in our society?
Click to expand...
Yeah, a deserted, ridiculed member of society is concerned about destroying humanity? And how, because they want to live a semi-normal life? Come on.
 
I believe the issue that’s emerging is that a California school district is not allowing parents to opt out. I haven’t fact-checked it yet, however.
 
From what I can it refers to this; Sex ed to become mandatory in grades 7-12 in California | EdSource

From what I can see it refers to acknowledging the existence of lgbt+ persons. I’ve taught a class about the and I have to think that people assume it’s more indepth than it actually is. One vitally important thing is mentioning that prophylactics are important even during homosexual intercourse to stop the spread of disease; this is something far too many people don’t know, expectant in regards to lesbian interactions.
 
Thanks. I believe there was a letter circulating in a school district claiming that parents couldn’t opt out. Don’t believe me until I can find a link, lol!
 
😊 I freely admit California is well out of my teaching zone by a continent or two!
 
laylow said:
40.png
Loud-living-dogma:
The motivation? What is the evil one’s motivation? Destroying humanity and the good in our society?
Click to expand...
Yeah, a deserted, ridiculed member of society is concerned about destroying humanity? And how, because they want to live a semi-normal life? Come on.
Click to expand...
When I said “the evil one” I meant Satan. Who did you think I meant?!
 
Loud-living-dogma said:
40.png
laylow:
40.png
Loud-living-dogma:
Am I the only one here that seems concerned that some people think all this gender / sex confusion is normal and justifiable? I get it that a tiny percentage of people didn’t form properly for whatever reason, but why are all these CAF people so accepting of the LGBTQQ agenda? Don’t know whether to laugh or cry…
Click to expand...
Why do you think it is a smaller percentage from what is being portrayed? Are you saying the people that have “this agenda” are fabricating their perspective? What would be the motivation of that?
Click to expand...
The motivation? What is the evil one’s motivation? Destroying humanity and the good in our society?
Click to expand...
I believe the misunderstanding came from here where it looks like you are saying those who seek rights for the lgbt+ community are motivated by a desire to destroy humanity.
 
Ah, well, I figure the evil one is the one trying to destroy humanity, yes?
 
Whelp it’s official. When I have children, I will set aside however much money necessary to enroll them in Catholic school.
 
ChunkMonk said:
In the past we would have these “teachers” swinging from a tree.
Click to expand...
I must say, it’s been a while since I’ve come across nostalgia for lynching on CAF.

Anyone else gonna say anything?
 
Last edited:
Blessings
Dear Lord, protect those who march for Your teachings. We must still the occupancy of evil over the country. We need Your help. Send Your angels to march w them. Let Souls be touched as TRUTH is standing before them.
In Jesus name
Tweedlealice
 
Alex337 said:
40.png
Loud-living-dogma:
Ah, well, I figure the evil one is the one trying to destroy humanity, yes?
Click to expand...
I’m not sure how that relates to people seeking lgbt+ rights and it may be where the confusion is coming from.
Click to expand...
You don’t think that Satan is behind all this undermining of traditional values, like marriage, and the virtue of chastity? I’m afraid I disagree with you. I believe you are greatly deceived. I will pray for you, Alex337.
 
Loud-living-dogma said:
40.png
Alex337:
40.png
Loud-living-dogma:
Ah, well, I figure the evil one is the one trying to destroy humanity, yes?
Click to expand...
I’m not sure how that relates to people seeking lgbt+ rights and it may be where the confusion is coming from.
Click to expand...
You don’t think that Satan is behind all this undermining of traditional values, like marriage, and the virtue of chastity? I’m afraid I disagree with you. I believe you are greatly deceived. I will pray for you, Alex337.
Click to expand...
I don’t think marriage has been undermined 🙂
 
LGBTQ+ “rights” include: Total acceptance (not toleration; I support toleration) of homosexual behavior; forcing people to provide service for an event they believe to be immoral (note: This is NOT the same thing as refusing service for a person’s demographic characteristics); redefining marriage to include marriage between members of the same sex; promotion of homosexuality as a positive and normal variant on sexuality in all public forums; and custody decisions reinforcing sexual confusion. These are not rights, but impinging on others’ rights.
 
What you describe, a woman with male parts inside or a man with a uterus, is a birth defect. It can be corrected according to the desire of the poor person who has the condition.
You object to the term hermaphrodite. I’m not going to start using politically correct terms. Intersex is part of the propaganda. What you described is a valid medical condition that can be corrected. That is far different from having a fully functioning body and cutting it up so that it looks different.
That’s an illusion supporting a delusion. Also, genitalia that is created by surgery is not fully functional. A woman who wishes to look like a man, will be given a penis that is a prosthetic. Science cannot create a functioning penis. Although I’m sure they’re working on it.
It is unnecessary surgery that reinforces the mental illness. No amount of propaganda changes reality. It only changes perception. Reality Remains the Same and as a result, the so-called solution is a major part of the problem.
All surgery comes with the risk of death. So unnecessary surgery goes against medical ethics.
The doctors that do this, do it for money or misguided ethics. It is not okay to risk someone’s life to do plastic surgery unless they have been mutilated in some way and need correction. Such as a burn victim or an accident victim.
 
ConfusedLucy said:
I just feel sad for say the girls who like trucks and prefer not to wear skirts or make up, this ideology is effectively telling them that they aren’t good enough to be female and must therefore be male. When you look into it it’s a more rigid view of gender than in fundamentalist Christianity.
Click to expand...
This.

My 14-year-okd “tomboy” just wants to be herself. She’s a girl and she knows it, though she’s not particularly happy about it. She defies gender stereotypes in so many ways and that’s okay. She is about individual, not defined or constricted by her gender. The problem is that people keep asking her if she’s trans,pushing the idea that if you think how a boy is “supposed” to think and act like a boy is “supposed” to act, then you must really be a boy inside. We can’t just let people be who they are. In the process of trying to normalize this incredibly complex and extremely rare condition, a lot more confusion is occurring.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top