Parents miss Mass, kids get ax

  • Thread starter Thread starter David_Paul
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
misericordie:
Here it is: A pastor in parish management crisis again and war with his parish memebrs: vice versa:

abclocal.go.com/wabc/news/wabc_062705_SIchurchclassban.html
If the pastor was not taking into effect sickness and illness then I would question his stance. I wonder if something else was going on there… Also, just using donation envelopes for attendance wouldn’t guarentee anything, either. I hope this is just incomplete reporting.
 
40.png
Lurch104:
So now not only are the parents away from the church, the kids have no chance. We should take every oppurtunity given to us to teach children the Gospel message. How sad.
Yes some pastors and priests alienate rather than unite. This is sad especially in today’s climate in the church in the USA. I wonder how the Archdiocese of New York, under who’s juristiction this church is will address this issue and pastor?:nope:
 
David_Paul said:
NY Daily News
06-27-05
NANCY DILLON

The pastor of a Staten Island Catholic church is playing holy hardball - kicking hundreds of kids out of religious ed classes because their families aren’t showing up at Mass.

The Rev. Michael Cichon, pastor of St. Joseph/St. Thomas in Pleasant Plains, used each family’s bar-coded donation envelope to track attendance.

He’s tossed about 300 kids from classes and told them not to reapply until next April.

Without the classes, children cannot receive the sacraments, meaning some youngsters who thought they’d be making their First Communion next year will have to wait.

The suspensions, legal under church doctrine, were a shock to many parents with kids enrolled in the 1,400-child program, which caters to kids who don’t attend Catholic schools.

“It’s hurtful,” said Joseph LoPizzo, 38, whose 6-year-old son was booted. “I’ve been a parishioner at that church for 23 years - longer than he’s been the reverend.”

LoPizzo said he paid the $150 for his son’s Thursday afternoon classes last year, but his father-in-law’s illness hampered the family’s church attendance.

“I’ve just never heard of a church kicking you out,” complained Lisa Nicol, 36, who got a letter saying her 7-year-old twin daughters had been barred from classes. “They should be more welcoming and sensitive.”

The pastor said he suspended kids from the 2005-2006 after-school program because Mass is an “essential” component of the Catholic faith.

The affected families were attending church less than once a month, he said.

Cichon insisted that the move has nothing to do with the lack of a donation.

“There are many families who put absolutely nothing inside the envelopes they submit,” he said.

I wonder what will happen when this church stays with only 20 elderly parish members and people stop giving to the collection? The pockets always hurt in these cases. There are other approaches then preventing these poor kids from doing their First Holy Communion.
 
Good golly…

what gets me most is that they’re making it seem as if the priest is banning them from being Catholic or participating in Mass…
he’s only saying they can’t attend education classes IF the parents don’t support the education by attending Mass regularly (as true Catholics are obliged).

"Lisa LoPizzo: “He really thinks he did something wrong to God. That’s not fair to a 6-year-old, to be messed up like that.” "

Well, duh! Tell your son HE didn’t do anything wrong - YOU did something wrong and then you’re son won’t be messed up like that. Apologize to the kid - don’t blame the church. :mad:

Honestly!! Look - SOMEBODY in the extended family could have taken the kid to mass regularly while mom or dad was caring for the ill family member…besides - it is most important to pray constantly when a family member or friend is ill…talk about setting examples! It’s not just about attending Mass - what other Catholic messages was this family sending to this 6 year old child??
 
40.png
misericordie:
Yes some pastors and priests alienate rather than unite. This is sad especially in today’s climate in the church in the USA. I wonder how the Archdiocese of New York, under who’s juristiction this church is will address this issue and pastor?:nope:
There is no unity without truth. Our past 2 Holy Fathers have stated clearly that truth and charity are intertwined and cannot be seperated.

Christian charity is exemplified by a pastor who is willing to stand up for the 3rd Commandment and the Church’s consistent teaching that parents are the primary educators of faith. A policy requiring the family to come to mass is a most basic requirement. A family that considers the sacraments not necessary is instilling nothing of value in their child by making them do something they think is worthless.

Dioceses have spen the past 30 years trying to keep people in the church at the expense of teaching doctrine. It hasn’t worked. A new approach is required.
 
40.png
misericordie:
I wonder what will happen when this church stays with only 20 elderly parish members and people stop giving to the collection? The pockets always hurt in these cases. There are other approaches then preventing these poor kids from doing their First Holy Communion.
This isn’t about money. It is about saving souls for eternity.

Also, what usually happens in these cases is that the church grows because people are attracted to pastors that actually believe what they say they represent.
 
I’m with father Cichon on this. As an RE teacher I have seen how pointless RE is when the parents don’t support you by teaching the faith and taking the child to mass. And the war is not with the kids its with the parents who obvioulsy don’t want to take responsibility for their childs religious upbringing. I am sure that Lias LoPizzo was chosen for the article because she sounded the most unfairley done by. This is the normal media way. Those who don’t abide by the Church’s rules are poorly placed to demand the Church’s services.
 
Kay Walker:
Last year I taught the 8th grade confirmation class at my parish, and the DRE set the basic requirements for receiving the sacrament – Mass attendance was one of them. They were given a form that they had to complete – church, time, celebrant, and then they had to ask another parishioner present to sign the form on the line for the appropriate date. The DRE did take extenuating circumstances into consideration, such as family illness. Only those classes preparing for the sacraments – communion, confession, confirmation – were required to have the Mass attendance form complete.

I know it was a lot of work for her to track these forms. It may not have been a perfect solution, but it was a step in the right direction.
This is a great suggestion. Letting families know in advance what the requirements are and then holding them responsible. 👍
 
40.png
InnocentIII:
I’m with father Cichon on this. As an RE teacher I have seen how pointless RE is when the parents don’t support you by teaching the faith and taking the child to mass. And the war is not with the kids its with the parents who obvioulsy don’t want to take responsibility for their childs religious upbringing. I am sure that Lias LoPizzo was chosen for the article because she sounded the most unfairley done by. This is the normal media way. Those who don’t abide by the Church’s rules are poorly placed to demand the Church’s services.
I fail to see how it is the children’s fault here though? Now, if the pastor had a clear written statement stating (with the archdiocese’s permission beforehand) the policy that no exceptions will be made for the requirements of parents attending church with the kids, and that if a previous illness (then a letter from the doctors is needed) prevents them that’s the only reason allowed. However, I would consult the diocese’s legal office before hand if I were the pastor. One thing which many here fail to see is: that most likely this pastor will not be backed up by the Archdiocese and it’s leaders. Now if he were at the Diocese of Denver with the great Archbishop Chaput or the one of Lincoln Nebraska then this is a different story and he would have the backing of the diocese and Bishop (most likely). But in the Archdiocese where that Pastor is in this case, oh wow!! They will probably order him to resign, or he will get called in to respond to this especially if it is in the news as it is. Now if Cardinal O’Connor was still the archbishop, then the pastors would not be afraid to enforce catholic teachings regardless of what it entails.
 
40.png
misericordie:
I fail to see how it is the children’s fault here though? Now, if the pastor had a clear written statement stating (with the archdiocese’s permission beforehand) the policy that no exceptions will be made for the requirements of parents attending church with the kids, and that if a previous illness (then a letter from the doctors is needed) prevents them that’s the only reason allowed. However, I would consult the diocese’s legal office before hand if I were the pastor. One thing which many here fail to see is: that most likely this pastor will not be backed up by the Archdiocese and it’s leaders. Now if he were at the Diocese of Denver with the great Archbishop Chaput or the one of Lincoln Nebraska then this is a different story and he would have the backing of the diocese and Bishop (most likely). But in the Archdiocese where that Pastor is in this case, oh wow!! They will probably order him to resign, or he will get called in to respond to this especially if it is in the news as it is. Now if Cardinal O’Connor was still the archbishop, then the pastors would not be afraid to enforce catholic teachings regardless of what it entails.
we’re talking about religious ed class - not mass, not sacraments…why would it need bishop approval/backing?

and who’s blaming the kid??? This is all about the parents. Simple to resolve - start going to mass on regular basis with your child - no major sacrifice or inconvenience - even WITH a serious illness among extended family members.

The priest isn’t doing the punishing…it’s the parents not making good choices.
 
The pastor is responsible for making sure that the candidates are properly prepared and disposed for the receipt of the Sacraments. He doesn’t need diocisan approval or authority to exercise that responsibility.

If the kids are not attending Mass, they are almost assuredly not prepared. While there could be exceptions, I am not inclined to say that even missing Mass due to a family illness should be one of them. This is a reason that the parent might be excused or dispensed from his/her obligation to attend Mass but that excuse, if given, doesn’t make the child any more prepared.

My guess is that the parents were duly warned ahead of time. We issue the same statements to the parents and kids each year when CCE begins and again after the Christmas break. “Don’t sign your kids up for Sacrament prep if you are not bringing them to Mass.” Our pastor said that he wanted me to take attendance of the First Communion class at Mass one year but the DRE overruled. :eek:

It is cruel to build the kids up for the receipt of First Communion (and Confirmation) but leave them ignorant of the rest of the Mass not to mention keep them from future opportunities to receive.
 
40.png
Brad:
This isn’t about money. It is about saving souls for eternity.

Also, what usually happens in these cases is that the church grows because people are attracted to pastors that actually believe what they say they represent.
I agree, this is just another example of the soft bigotry of low expectations. Would you expect children to take CCD seriously if their parents just blow off going to mass or participating in parish life? I think they would be far more committed if they saw their parents’ commitment. It seems likely that the higher expectations will result in the parents taking this more seriously. That CCD is called 'Children Color and Draw" indicates that it has not been considered as an important element in religious education. Getting the parents involved might change that attitude
Lisa N
 
Children have a right to be instructed in the Catholic Faith, and the priest has an obligation to instruct them. They have a right to receive the sacraments, and the priest has an obligation to see that they are properly instructed.

Once a child reaches the age of reason, which is age 6 or 7, he can present himself to the priest. If the child is not baptised, the priest is obligated to prepare the child for baptism and must baptize the child.

These obligations of the priest are not contigent on whether or not the child’s parents are practicing Catholics.

Churches in suburban areas are often beyond walking distance. Children have to find someone who will drive them to church. If parents are not willing to bring their children to church on a regular basis, it is not the child’s fault. A solution to transportation problems would be for the church to provide bus service.
 
40.png
kmktexas:
The pastor is responsible for making sure that the candidates are properly prepared and disposed for the receipt of the Sacraments. He doesn’t need diocisan approval or authority to exercise that responsibility.

If the kids are not attending Mass, they are almost assuredly not prepared. While there could be exceptions, I am not inclined to say that even missing Mass due to a family illness should be one of them. This is a reason that the parent might be excused or dispensed from his/her obligation to attend Mass but that excuse, if given, doesn’t make the child any more prepared.

My guess is that the parents were duly warned ahead of time. We issue the same statements to the parents and kids each year when CCE begins and again after the Christmas break. “Don’t sign your kids up for Sacrament prep if you are not bringing them to Mass.” Our pastor said that he wanted me to take attendance of the First Communion class at Mass one year but the DRE overruled. :eek:

It is cruel to build the kids up for the receipt of First Communion (and Confirmation) but leave them ignorant of the rest of the Mass not to mention keep them from future opportunities to receive.
What you are saying about not needing the diocesan approval is true: but NOT in the Archdiocese where that church is located. Ever heard of micro management? Well I leave it at that.
 
I think that the pastor needs to take into account illnesses and such. This woman, Lisa, had some really valid reasons. She didn’t screw up as far as I can tell. Her father was critically ill and her daughter’s skull was fractured. Believe me, under that kind of stress, I’m sure she felt that God would understand. And maybe it wouldn’t be easy to just find someone to take her child to Mass-she may have just moved there and didn’t know anyone, maybe the people she knew weren’t going to Mass, etc. Now if we are just talking blowing off Mass, that’s a different story.
 
40.png
YinYangMom:
Good golly…

what gets me most is that they’re making it seem as if the priest is banning them from being Catholic or participating in Mass…
he’s only saying they can’t attend education classes IF the parents don’t support the education by attending Mass regularly (as true Catholics are obliged).

"Lisa LoPizzo: “He really thinks he did something wrong to God. That’s not fair to a 6-year-old, to be messed up like that.” "

Well, duh! Tell your son HE didn’t do anything wrong - YOU did something wrong and then you’re son won’t be messed up like that. Apologize to the kid - don’t blame the church. :mad:

Honestly!! Look - SOMEBODY in the extended family could have taken the kid to mass regularly while mom or dad was caring for the ill family member…besides - it is most important to pray constantly when a family member or friend is ill…talk about setting examples! It’s not just about attending Mass - what other Catholic messages was this family sending to this 6 year old child??
OR, since this family were such great members of the parish, why hadn’t they called to let the pastor know about the troubles in their family? This is the stupidest Catholic-bashing story I ever read in my life. Oh. Correction. The Pope is responsible for AIDS in Africa because Catholics can’t use condoms. I guess that’s dumber.
 
40.png
Pisio:
p.s.- Lurch, I am not questioning your dedication as a catechist, only praying that your love and zeal for the Faith will be increased and taken to another level you may not have known it could go to. I have the utmost respect for anyone who chooses to teach the Faith in any capacity, only pray they will always look to do more.
Uh… 5-10 hours per week would be a bare minimum for me. First of all, the class is 1.5 hours long. I spend at least 5 hours per week preparing the lesson for the 1.5 hours. That does not include my own formation (classes, extra reading, monthly evening retreats, etc). I am already working my lesson plans for next September.

I also spend quite a bit of time with the youth ministry. I chaperone many outings. Basically, my wife and I make ourselves available whenever possible. I firmly believe in being a positive example to these children, some of whom don’t have much of one at home.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top