Perspective | Catholics want New York’s Gov. Cuomo to be excommunicated for his

  • Thread starter Thread starter ramartensjr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I was reading one of the other threads, does Governor Cuomo even regularly go to church somewhere? If I signed that bill, I’d be pretty embarrassed to show my face around a Catholic Church. I hope he is snubbed around St. Pat’s day or things like that.

Excommunication might just call attention to this and who knows if he even attends mass.
 
Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the Archbishop of New York, told “Fox & Friends” Monday morning it would just be “ammunition” for pro-abortion opponents who would dismiss the issue as a Catholic one and not a human rights issue. He said he gets “wheelbarrows” full of letters a day asking about it.

“He’s not going to be moved by this, so what’s the use?” Dolan remarked.
What’s the use? How about demonstrating that God will not be mocked.

Gutless!
 
as i read, the cardinal will not ex-communicate cuomo because cuomo will use it ad a badge of honor and further denigrate the church
Where did you read this? I am a little doubtful. He still identifies as Catholic I believe.
 
What an appalling statement. Especially this claim:

“The Canon Law [915] you quoted also says you have to use it for medicinal purpose and you think there’s going to be a good effect that can come out of this,”

I am uneasy contradicting a cardinal about what canon law says, but in fact that is not what Canon 915 says.

Can. 915 Those who have been excommunicated or interdicted after the imposition or declaration of the penalty and others obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.

There is nothing there about the “medicinal purpose” and the “good effect” one should look for. What is there is a simple command: people meeting specific criteria “are not to be admitted” to communion. That is a command, not a suggestion. Cardinal Dolan’s comments are stunningly misdirected.
 
The bishops further lament that the new law will expand abortion. They express concern that “New York law is moving in the wrong direction” and state further: “Our Governor and legislative leaders hail this new abortion law as progress. This is not progress.” The bishops pledged to continue to provide help for pregnant women in need.
As a condemnation of the most permissive facilitation of abortion in America, it can only be described as pathetic . All they have said is how “sad” they are and how they “mourn” when what they need to express is absolute outrage which needs to be specifically directed at Cuomo and his co-conspirators. Instead of fury we have episcopal hand-wringing and barely anything more. The legally sanctioned slaughter of a completely helpless group of innocents is merely described by the bishops as “moving the state in the wrong direction.” Such understated rhetoric simply does not match the urgency and tragedy of the impending slaughter. And absolutely missing are any consequences for those Catholic lawmakers who lobbied and voted for this law, and even celebrated its passage as when Cuomo directed state public monuments be illuminated in pink lights to, in his words, “celebrate this achievement and shine a bright light forward for the rest of the nation to follow.”
(Bolding added)
 
Last edited:
All they have said is how “sad” they are and how they “mourn” when what they need to express is absolute outrage
Agreed.

Further, the person who does not become irate when he has cause to be, sins. For an unreasonable patience is the hotbed of many vices: it fosters negligence, and stimulates not only the wicked, but above all the good, to do wrong. (St. Chrysostom)
 
Some people have proposed this, but I read on Edward Peters’ blog that provision of Canon Law wouldn’t apply in this case for whatever reason; he was still in favor of some kind of sanction or punishment based on other provisions of Canon Law.
Here is an article by another canon lawyer arguing that excommunication would be appropriate.
I think at this point there would still be value in excommunicating Cuomo not because there would be any realistic chance of changing his mind, but because it is necessary to set an example for others. You can go after the stray sheep, but if he doesn’t want to come back, you’ll eventually have to let him find his own way and go back to look after the others.
Determining the appropriateness of excommunication is above my pay grade, but if allowed under canon law then it ought to be used, and it ought to be vitandi.

On the other hand, there were the vitandi , those to be shunned, expelled from the Catholic community and barred from even attending Mass until they had atoned for their conduct.
 
Last edited:
Peters’ response to that article is his January 30 post here:


His general take on the appropriate measures is the January 24 post. I’m no canon lawyer, but he seems to make a lot of sense. He sees certain obstacles to a heresy judgment (and pitfalls in taking that route), but sees a clear violation of 1369 (using public shows or speeches to seriously damage good morals) which requires a “just penalty.” His argument is that a lesser penalty than excommunication should be applied first and would more easily be defended as just, then, if there is still obstinacy, the Church could proceed to excommunication (obstinacy in the face of a lesser penalty would provide more of a basis for the justness of going all the way to excommunication). There is certainly an argument for going straight to it as a “just penalty” though.

Also, just to add, I agree with your earlier post that canon 915 is not primarily intended to be medicinal, and as Peters notes, it is not even a penalty. It is a norm of sacramental discipline intended to avoid scandal.
 
Last edited:
While I would personally like to see Cuomo excommunicated I would not want it attempted in any way that could be seen to be inappropriate. If canon law does not allow it then that’s the end of it. I would be happy to see c. 1369 used along with the application of a “just penalty.” There is little doubt in my mind that, whatever the penalty, Cuomo would at best ignore it and at worst belittle it, although the latter could - and hopefully would - lead to excommunication as the appropriate next response.

Any action, however, would depend on the fortitude of Bishop Scharfenberger of Albany, or Cardinal Dolan of New York. There is some hope that the Bishop of Albany might act.
 
“These VA & NY late-term abortion bills should be a call to action for all Americans,” Vice President Pence tweeted Thursday. “It would be unconscionable for us to let this moment pass in silence. We must recommit ourselves to restoring the sanctity of life to the center of American law.”
 
I am reminded of something Peter Kreeft say about God no making styrofoam millstones. Public figures that tout their faith and then deny it by their actions have repercussions that will not be known until they stand before the throne of God.
 
Spokane, Wash., Feb 2, 2019 / 11:24 am (CNA).- The Bishop of Spokane said Friday that that politicians who publicly support abortion should not receive the Eucharist in his diocese.

“Politicians who reside in the Catholic Diocese of Spokane, and who obstinately persevere in their public support for abortion, should not receive Communion without first being reconciled to Christ and the Church,” Bishop Thomas Daly wrote in a Feb. 1 letter to his diocese.
 
Amid Catholic leaders’ calls for excommunication, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has dug in his heels and defended a controversial state law that loosens the rules on abortion.

The law allows abortions to be performed by non-doctors up until the point of birth for many reasons. Cuomo, who touts his Catholic faith and who once was an altar boy, brushed off criticism of the law on Tuesday.

“The Catholic Church doesn’t believe in a woman’s right to choose. Yes, I understand their religious view,” he said. “But I’m not here to legislate religion.”

Cuomo pointed out that his father, Mario Cuomo, the late former three-term governor, received similar criticism for his support of abortion in New York.

“Bishops attacking Governor Cuomo,” he said with laughter. “Let’s pull that headline up from about 30 years ago.”
Bolding mine.
 
Father Jonathan Morris told “America’s Newsroom” Tuesday Cuomo is trying to use the “disgusting” abuse of minors by the Catholic church as a way to say he is “morally correct” after passing the “Reproductive Health Act.”

MIKE HUCKABEE: NEW YORK’S HORRIFIC NEW ABORTION LAW AND ROE V. WADE ARE BOTH BUILT ON THE SAME LIE

Morris said excommunication is still an option but doesn’t seem like it would be helpful or effective.

“For some reason he still calls himself a Catholic," Morris said, "I would just say come back or just say you’re not a Catholic.”
Bolding mine.
 
“For some reason he still calls himself a Catholic," Morris said, "I would just say come back or just say you’re not a Catholic .”
That’s all well and good but that, in itself, would not absolve the competent, ecclesiastical authority from making appropriate decisions regarding the Church’s penal law. It’s like the distinction between canons 915 and 916.

Dan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top